Impact of Firm Attributes on the Efficiency of Brokerage Houses

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 159 - 181, 01.12.2011

Hakan Aygören M. Ensar Yeşilyurt

Öz

Financial markets exist in order to bring together buyers and sellers of securities. Financial intermediaries, also known as financial institutions play an important role in financial markets. The most important contribution of financial intermediaries is a steady and relatively inexpensive flow of funds from savers to final users or investors. Thus efficiency of financial intermediaries is of importance for efficient markets. Brokerage houses efficiency is closely related to efficiency of financial markets due to the transaction costs and speed of transacting. This study analyzes the factors influencing the efficiency of brokerage houses by using Stochastic Frontier Analysis SFA . The results show that several firm attributes have impact on efficiency. The results indicate that age of brokerage houses and numbers of employees have positive impact on efficiency, however, other firm attributes such as number of branches, firm size, financial leverage, and service ratio Stock transactions/Total transaction have negative impact on efficiency of brokerage houses

Anahtar Kelimeler

Efficiency, Brokerage Houses, Stochastic Frontier SFA , Financial Markets, Financial Intermediary

Aracı Kurum Firma Özelliklerinin Etkinlik Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Finansal piyasalar, menkul kıymet alım ve satımını yapanları bir araya getiren piyasalardır. Finansal kurumlar olarak da sınıflandırılan finansal aracılar finansal piyasalarda önemli rol oynarlar. Finansal aracıların en önemli katkısı fonların tasarruf sahiplerinden fon talep edenlere göreli olarak ucuza aktarmasıdır. Dolayısıyla, aracı kurumların etkinliği işlem maliyetleri ve hızı açısından değerlendirildiğinde finansal piyasaların etkinliğiyle yakından ilgilidir. Bu çalışma da, aracı kurumların etkinliğini etkileyen faktörler Stochastic Frontier Analizi SFA kullanılarak irdelenmektedir. Sonuçlar bazı aracı kurum özellikleri etkinliği etkilediğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlara göre ; aracı kurumun yaşı ve çalışan sayısı etkinlik üzerinde olumlu etkiye sahip iken, şube sayısı, aracı kurum büyüklüğü, finansal kaldıraç ve hizmet rasyosu Hisse senedi işlem büyüklüğü/Toplam işlem büyüklüğü olumsuz etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etkinlik, Aracı Kurumlar, Stochastic Frontier SFA , Finansal Piyasalar, Finansal Kurumlar.

Kaynakça

• 1. Aigner, D. Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, Journal of Econometrics, pp. 21-37.
• 2. Aktaş, H. and M., Kargın,(2007). Türk Sermaye Piyasasındaki Aracı Kurumların Etkinliği ve Verimliliği, İşletme Finans Dergisi, 258, pp.97-117.
• 3. Aktaş, H., (1999), Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Verimlilik: Kamu ve Özel Bankaların Karşılaştırılması, Yöneylem Araştırması ve Endüstri Mühendisliği 20. Ulusal Kongresi, 8-9 Haziran, Kara Harp Okulu, Ankara.
• 4. Avkiran, N.K., (1999). The Evidence On Efficiency Gains: The Role Of Mergers and the Benefits to the Public, Journal of Banking and Finance 23, pp. 991- 1013.
• 5. Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1995). A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Economics 20, pp. 325-332.
• 6. Battese, G.E. and Corra, G.S. (1977). Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 21, pp. 169-179.
• 7. Berger, A.N. and D.B., Humphrey, (1997). Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for the Future Research, European Journal of Operational Research 98, pp. 175-212.
• 8. Berger, A.N. and Mester, L.J. (1997). Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences with Efficiency of Financial Institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance 21. 895-947.
• 9. Brockett, P.L., W.W., Cooper, L.L., Golden, J.J., Rousseau, and Wang, Y., (2005). Financial Intermediary Versus Production Approach to Efficiency of Marketing Distribution Systems and Organizational Structure of Insurance Companies, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 72, pp. 393-412.
• 10. Casu, B., and Girardone, C., (2009). Testing The Relationship Between Competition And Efficiency In Banking: A Panel Data Analysis, Economics Letters 105, 134-137.
• 11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
• 12. Coelli, T. (1996). A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Frotier Production Function Estimation, CEPA Working Paper 96/07, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armindale.
• 13. Coelli, T. J. (1992). A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation: FRONTIER, Version 2.0, Economic Letters 39, pp. 29-32.
• 14. Coelli, T.J.(1995). Recent Developments in Frontier Estimation and Efficiency Measurement, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39, pp. 219–245.
• 15. Coelli, T.J., D. S. Prasada Rao, C. J. O’Donnell and G. Battase,(2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Second Edition, Springer.
• 16. Cummins, J.D., and M., Weiss, (1993). Measuring Cost Efficiency in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Banking and Finance 17, pp.463-481.
• 17. Cummins, J.D., M., Weiss, and H., Zi, (1999). Organizational form and Eficiency: The Coexistence of Stock and Mutual in the Property-Liability Insurers, Management Science 45, pp. 1254-1269.
• 18. Fabbozzi, F.J., F., Modigliani, and , M.G., Ferri (1994). Foundations of Financial Markets, Prentice-Hall, NJ
• 19. Fukuyama, H., and W.L., Weber, (1999). The efficiency and productivity of Japanese securities firms, 1988-93, Japan and the World Economy 11, pp. 115-133.
• 20. Goldberg, L.G. and A., Rai, (1996). The Structure Performance Relationshipfor European Banking, Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 745-771.
• 21. Greene W.H. (1990). A Gamma-Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model, Journal of Econometrics, 46: 141–163.
• 22. Gündüz, L, C., Yılmaz, and M.K., Yılmaz, (2001). Türkiye’deki Aracı Kurumların Performans Analizi (1993-1998): Kantitatif Bir Değerleme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, pp. 38-53.
• 23. Humphrey, D.B. and L.B., Pulley, (1997). Banks' Responses to Deregulation: Profits, Technology, and Efficiency, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29, pp. 73-93.
• 24. Kauko, K. (2009). Managers and efficiency in Banking, Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 546-556.
• 25. Kodde, D. A. and F. C. Palm., (1986).Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions, Econometrica 54, pp. 1243-1248.
• 26. Kumbhakar, S., Ghosh S.C and McGuckin J.T. (1991). A Generalised Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms, Journal of Business, Economics and Statistics 9, pp. 279– 286.
• 27. Lee, J. (2002). Effect of List Errors on the estimation of Population Size. Biometrics 58, 185-191.
• 28. Meeusen, W. and J. an den Broeck. (1977). Efficiency Estimation from CobbDouglas Production Functions with Composed Error, International Economic Review 18, pp. 435-444
• 29. Pasiouras, F., Tana, S. and Zopounidis, C. (2009). The Impact Of Banking Regulations On Banks' Cost And Profit Efficiency: Cross-Country Evidence, International Review of Financial Analysis 18, 294-302.
• 30. Rangan, N., R., Grabowski, Aly, and C., Purska, (1988). The Technical Efficiency of US Banks, Economic Letters 28, pp. 169-175.
• 31. Reifschneider, D. and R. Stevenson. (1991). Systematic Departures from The Frontier: A Framework for The Analysis of Firm Inefficiency, International Economic Review 323, pp. 715-723.
• 32. Richmond, J. (1974). Estimating the Efficiency of Production, International Economic Review 15, pp. 515–521.
• 33. Schmidt, P. (1986). Frontier Production Functions. Econometric Reviews 4, 289-328.
• 34. Stevenson, R. (1980). Likelihood Functions for Generalized Stochastic Frontier Estimation, Journal of Econometrics 13, pp. 58 66.
• 35. Thoraneenitiyan, N., and Avkıran, N. (2009). Measuring The Impact Of Restructuring And Country-Specific Factors On The Efficiency Of Post-Crisis East Asian Banking Systems: Integrating DEA With SFA, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 43, 240-252.
• 36. Tulkens, H. (1993). On the FDH Efficiency Analysis: Some Methodological Issues and Applications to Retail Banking, Courts, and Urban Transit, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 183-210.
• 37. Wang, K.. L., Y.T., Tseng, and C.C., Weng, (2003). A study of production efficiencies of integrated securities firms in Taiwan, Applied Financial Economics 13, pp. 159–167
• 38. Weill, L. (2003). Banking Efficiency in Transition Economies: The Role of Foreign Ownership. The Economics of Transition 11, 569-592.
• 39. Weill, L. (2009). Convergence In Banking Efficiency Across European Countries, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 19, 818-833.
• 40. West, R., (1975). On the Difference between Internal and External Market Efficiency, Financial Analysts Journal 31, pp. 30-34.
• 41. Zaim, O., (1995). The Effect of Financial Liberalization on the Efficiency of Turkish Commercial Banks, Applied Financial Economies, 5, pp. 257-264.