DÜZENLİ HAT DENİZ TAŞIMACILIĞINDA HİZMET KALİTESİNİ OLUŞTURAN BOYUTLARIN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELLEMESİYLE ANALİZİ

Yıl 2021, , 274 - 291, 31.12.2021

Ayşe Taş Murat Yorulmaz

https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/2.274-291

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, layner deniz taşımacılığında verilen hizmetlerin kalitesini oluşturan boyutların Thai’nin (2008) ROPMIS modeli esas alınarak hazırlanan ölçüm modeline göre belirlenmesi ve boyutların güvenilirliklerinin ve geçerliliklerinin yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile incelenmesidir. Bu amaca yönelik olarak da Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 52 forvarder işletmesinin 316 çalışanından anket tekniği ile toplanan veriler SPSS v22 ve AMOS v22 paket programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz bulguları, ölçüm modelinde yer alan kaynaklar, çıktı, süreç, yönetim, imaj ve sosyal sorumluluk boyutlarının, layner deniz taşımacılığının hizmet kalitesini açıklamakta yeterli olduğu ve hizmet kalitesi ölçüm modelinin hem birinci düzey çok faktörlü hem de ikinci düzey olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile elde edilen veriler kullanılarak yapılan benzeşme ve ayrışma geçerliliği analizleri sonucunda, ölçüm modelinin yapısal olarak geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

ANALYSIS OF THE DIMENSIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY IN LINER MARINE TRANSPORTATION BY STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Öz

The purpose of this study is to identify the dimensions that constitute the quality of the services offered in the liner maritime transport through the measurement model developed based on the ROPMIS model by Thai (2008), and to examine the reliability and validity of these dimensions with structural equation modelling. The data were obtained from 316 employees working at 52 businesses through questionnaire and analysed through SPSS v22 and AMOS v22 Statistics. The findings indicate that the dimensions of resources, outcomes, process, management, image, and social responsibility in the measurement model are sufficient to explain the quality of service and that the service quality measurement model can be used both as a first-level multifactorial model and a second-level model. Further, the analyses for convergent and discriminant validity performed based on the data from the confirmatory factor analysis show that the measurement model is structurally valid and reliable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liner Marine Transportation, Maritime Management, Service Quality Dimensions

Kaynakça

• Altan, Ş., & Ediz, A. (2016). Türkiye’de yüksek hızlı tren(yht) için hizmet kalitesinin ölçümü, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18/3, 695-720.
• Anderson, J., and Gerbing, D. (2017). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3).
• Balci, G., I.B., Cetin and Tanyeri, M. ( 2018) Differentiation of container shipping services in Turkey. Transport Policy, 61, 26–35.
• Bülbül, H., and Demirer, Ö. (2008). Hizmet kalitesi ölçüm modelleri servqual ve serperf’in karşılaştırmalı analizi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 181-198.
• Chen, K.K., C.T Chang and Lai, C.S. (2009). Service quality gaps of business customers in the shipping industry, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1): 222–237.
• Dennet't, C., E.M. Ineson, G.J. Stone and Colgate, M. ( 2000). Pre-bookable services in the chartered airline ındustry: increasing satisfaction through differentiation, The Service lndustries Journal, 20(2), 82-94. Ding, J.F., and Tsai, P.P. (2012). Evaluating quality ımprovement of service recovery for ocean freight forwarders in Taiwan, Information Technology Journal, 11(11):1579-1587.
• Durvasula, S., S. Lysonski, and Mehta, S. (2002). Understanding the interfaces: How ocean freight shipping lines can maximize satisfaction, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 491-504.
• Durvasula, S., S. Lysonski, and Mehta, S. (1999). Testing the SERVQUAL scale in the business-to-business sector: The case of ocean freight shipping service, Journal of Services Marketing, 13 (2), 1999, 132 – 150.
• Eleren, A. and Kılıç, B. (2007). Turizm sektöründe servqual analizi ile hizmet kalitesinin ölçülmesi ve bir termal otelde uygulama, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1), 235 – 263.
• Erenkol, A. D. (2005). Hizmet kalitesi ölçümünde kullanılan servqual modelinin zayıf olduğu ileri sürülen teorik ve uygulama yönlerine yönelik olarak yapılan değerlendirmeler, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları.
• Fanam, Peter Dzakah and Leigh Ackerly (2019), Evaluating ocean carrier selection criteria: perspectives of Tasmanian shippers, Journal of Shipping and Trade, 4(5), 2-16.
• Fornell, C., and D. F Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39–50.
• Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and ıts marketing ımplications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
• Haralambides, H. E. (2007). Structure and operations in the layner shipping industry, Handbook Of Transport Modelling, Edi:2nd, Chapter: 40, Editors: K.J. Button and D.A. Hensher pp:607-621.
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and Anderson R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Ho, T.C., R.H. Chiu, C. C. Chung, and Hsuan, S. L. (2017). Key influence factors for ocean freight forwarders selectıng container shipping lines using the revised dematel approach, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 25(3), 299-310.
• Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Huang, S.T., E.Bulut & Duru, O. (2015). Service quality assessment in layner shipping industry: an empirical study on Asian shipping case, Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7 (2), 221- I. IMEAK Deniz Ticaret Odası (2019), Denizcilik Sektör Raporu, 1-329.
• İkiz, H.E. ( 2010). Hizmet kalitesi modellerinin karşılaştırılması üzerine bir araştırma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, s.1-146.
• Kannan,V., S.K. Bose and Kannan, N.G. (2011). An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: an Indian shipper’s perspective, Management Research Review, 34(7), 754-772.
• Kang, G.D and Y.D. Kim (2009). An analysis of the measurement of the shipping service quality, The Asian Journa of Shipping of Logistics, 25(1), 41-55.
• Karsten, C.V. (2015). Competitive layner shipping network design, Technical University of Denmark DTU, Management Engineering Management Science, 1-281.
• Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Kline, P. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The guilford press, New York, NY.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL- A multipleıtem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 64 (1): 12-40.
• Samija, S., I. Kolanovic & Dundovic, C. (2015). Systematic approach to determining the factors of quality of maritime transport service, Poslovna Izvrsnost Zagreb, IX, 121-141.
• Seth, N., S.G. Deshmukh and Vrat, P. (2005). Service quality models: a review, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22 (9), 913-949.
• Sürücü, E. and Sakar, G. D. (2018) . Sosyal medya aracılığıyla paydaş katılımının ölçülmesi: Türk lojistik hizmet sağlayan işletmeler üzerine bir inceleme, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 58.
• Thai, V.V. (2016), The impact of port service quality on customer satisfaction: The case of Singapore, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18 (4), 458–475.
• Thai, V. V. (2008) Service quality in maritime transport: conceptual model and empirical evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4): 493-518.
• Tuan, L. A., Vu H. T. and Nhan N L. ( 2018), Study of satisfaction of customers for the quality of sea transport services: case in tan cang shipping joint stock company danang branch, International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 3(4), 220-224.
• Tuna, Okan (2001), Dimensions of service quality in container transportation: An empirical ınvestigation, developments in maritime transport and logistics in Turkey, ed. Mahmut Celal Barla, Osman Kamil Sag, Michael Roe and Richard Grey, London and Newyork, 26-34.
• Yeo, G.T., V. V.,Thai and Roh, S.Y. (2015). An analysis of port service quality and customer satisfaction: the case of Korean container ports, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(4), 437-447.
• Yuen, K. F. and V.V. Thai, (2015), Service quality and customer satisfaction in layner shipping, International Journal of Quality and Sevice Sciences, 7(2/3),170-83.
• Yüksel, M., and Önaçan, M. B. K. (2018). Algılanan hizmet kalitesinin müşteri memnuniyetine etkisi: Türkiye’de deniz yolcu taşımacılığında bir uygulama. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 6(2), 20-38.
• Zin,S. S., L.,Sarawut and Chaowarat, M. (2014). An empirical assessment of maritime logistics service quality in Myanmar, KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Volume 6(2), 001-028.