KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ, KİŞİ-GRUP UYUMU VE GÖREV PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ: KAVRAMSAL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Yıl 2023, , 304 - 326, 21.06.2023

Fulya Güngör , Tamer Bolat

https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1277922

Cited By: 1

Öz

Günümüz çalışma modelleri, rekabet koşulları, iş yaşamındaki beklenti ve gereksinimler çalışma koşullarını değiştirirken; yönetim alanında uygulanan eski yöntem ve tekniklerin verimliliğini sorgulatmaktadır. Çalışma gruplarına ayrılan büyük birimler, proje bazlı iş yapış şekillerinin yaygınlaşması, entelektüel sermaye unsuru olan insanın ve insan odaklı yaklaşımların önemini artırmıştır. Bu bağlamda işgörenin, örgütü, işi veya yöneticisi ile uyumuna ek olarak çalışma grubu ile olan uyum ya da uyumsuzluğunun bireysel veya grup performansına etkileri önemli hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, kişilik özellikleri, kişi-çalışma grubu uyumu ve bu uyumun görev performansı ile ilişkisi açıklanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler görgül çalışmalar ile desteklenirken, kuramsal olarak benzerlik-çekim, çekilme-seçilme-ayrılma, denge, sosyal kimlik, ilişkisel demografik yaklaşımı ve iş özellikleri modeli ile değerlendirilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kişilik Özellikleri, Grup Uyumu, Görev Performansı

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS, PERSON-GROUP FIT AND TASK PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: A CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION

Öz

While today's working models, competition conditions, expectations and requirements in business life change
working conditions; It questions the efficiency of the old methods and techniques applied in the field of
management. The widespread use of large units and project-based ways of doing business, which are divided into working groups, has increased the importance of human and human-oriented approaches, which are the elements of intellectual capital. In this context, in addition to the fit of the employee with the organization, job or manager, the effects of the fit or incompatibility with the work group on individual or group performance have become important. n this study, personality traits, person-workgroup fit and the relationship of this fit with task performance are explained. While the relationships between the variables were supported by empirical studies, theoretically similarity-attraction, attraction-selection-attrition, balance, social identity, relational demographic approach and job characteristics model were evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Personality Traits, Group Fit, Task Performance

Kaynakça

• Abdalla, A., Elsetouhi, A., Negm, A., & Abdou, H. (2018). Perceived Person-Organization Fit and Turnover Intention in Medical Centers. Personnel Review, 47(4), 863-881.
• Adkins, C. L., Russell, C. J., & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Judgments of Fit in The Selection Process: The Role of Work Value Congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 605 - 623.
• Ahmad, K. Z. (2008). Relationship Between Leader-Subordinate Personality Congruence and Performance and Satisfaction in The UK. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 5, 396-411.
• Aytaç, S. (2000). İnsanı Anlama Çabası. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-Managed Groups:The Role of Personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 62-78.
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta‐Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1-26.
• Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To Your Heart's Content:A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836.
• Baymur, F. (1969). Genel Psikoloji. İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka Kitapevleri.
• Befort, N., & Hattrup, K. (2003). Valuing Task and Contextual Performance:Experience, Job Roles, and Ratings of the Importance of Job Behaviors. Applied H.R.M. Research, 8(1), 17-32.
• Bertolino, M., Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2013). Age Effects on Perceived Personality and Job Performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7/8), 867-885.
• Bettman, J. R. (1970). Information Processing Models of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(3), 370-376.
• Bilgiç, R. (2008). İş Özellikleri Kuramı:Geniş Kapsamlı Gözden Geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(22), 66-77.
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
• Bowen, D. E., Ledfor, G. E., & Nathan, B. R. (1991). Hiring For The Organization,Not The Job. Academy of Management Executive, 5(4), 35-51.
• Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The Psychology Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-243.
• Burch, G. S., & Anderson, N. (2004). Measuring Person-Team Fit: Development and Validation of the Team Selection Inventory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(4), 406-426.
• Burke, R. J., & Deszca, E. (1982). Preferred Organizational Climates of Type A Individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 50-59.
• Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., & Stefaniak, D. (1967). Attraction and Similarity of Personality Characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(1), 82-90.
• Campbell, J. P., Mchenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling Job Performance in a Population. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313-333.
• Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–292.
• Chuang, A., Shen, C.-T., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Development of a Multidimensional Instrument of Person–Environment Fit: The Perceived Person–Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65(1), 66–98.
• Chuang, Y.-T., Church, R., & Zikic, J. (2004). Organizational Culture,Group Diversity and Intra-Group Conflict. Team Performance Management, 26-34.
• Cüceloğlu, D. (2011). İnsan ve Davranış (22.Basım b.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. Çiçek, I., Evcimen, İ. V., & Biçer, İ. H. (2018). Örgüsel Bağlamda Kişi-Grup Uyumu (Kuramsal Perspektif). Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(3), 699-731.
• Çiçek, I., Evcimen, İ., & Biçer, İ. H. (2018). Örgütsel Bağlamda Uyum Metodolojisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 757-785.
• Demirtaş, A. H. (2003). Sosyal Kimlik Kuramı,Temel Kavram ve Varsayımlar. İletişim : Araştırmaları, 1(1), 123-144.
• Demirtaş, T. E. (2019). Kişilik ve Kişiliğin Temel Kavramları. D. G. Kurt, & E. Ç. Yıldz içinde, Kişilik Kuramları,Gerçek Yaşamdan Kişilik Analizi Örnekleriyle (4. b.). Ankara: Pegem.
• Eren, E. (2012). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
• Ewen, R. B. (1998). An Introduction to Theories Personality . New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Publisher.
• Fatke, M. (2017). Personality Traits and Political Ideology: A First Global Assessment. Political Psychology, 5(36), 881-899.
• Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008). Theories of Personality 7th Edition. New York: McGraw−Hill.
• Ferris, G. R., Youngblood, S. A., & Yates, V. L. (1985). Personality, Training Performance, and Withdrawal:A Test of the Person-Group Fit Hypothesis for Organizational Newcomers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 377-388.
• Gibbard, K., Griep, Y., Cooman, R. D., Hoffart, G., Onen, D., & Zareipour, H. (2017). One Big Happy Family?Unraveling the Relationship between Shared Perceptions of Team Person-Team Fit and Team. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-13.
• Greenberg, J., Schmader, T., Arndt, J., & Landau, M. (2015). Social Psychology The Science of Everyday Life. New York: Worth Publishers.
• Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance. Organziational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15.
• Gülduran, Ç. A., & Perçin, N. Ş. (2020). Beş Büyük Kişilik Özelliğinin Sanal Kaytarma Davranışı ve İş Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 37-56.
• Güney, S. (2004). Açıklamalı Yönetim-Organizasyon ve Örgütsel Davranış Terimler Sözlüğü. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Hackman, R. J., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
• Hackman, R. J., Oldham, G., Janson, R., & Purdy, K. (1975). A New Strategy for Job Enrichment. California Management Review, 17(4), 57-71.
• Hackman, R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
• Hambric, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firm Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
• Hamilton, B. H., Nickerson, J. A., & Owan, H. (2003). Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 465-497.
• Harmcanı, K. Y. (2018). Örgütsel Yaşamda Kişilik ve Performans İlişkisinde Pozitif Duygusallığın Aracı Rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 321-341.
• Heider, F. (1944). Social Perception and Phenomenal Causality Psychological review . Psychological Review, 51(6), 358-373.
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. Published as a separate and in The Journal of PsychoIogy, 21(1), 107–112.
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2003). Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(3), 301-325.
• Hoffman, R. L. (1959). Homogeneity of Member Personality and its Effect on Group ProblemSolving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(1), 27-32.
• Holland, J. L. (1962). Some Explorations of a Theory of Vocational Choice: I. One-and TwoYear Longitudinal Studies. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(26), 1-49.
• Holland, J. L. (1963). Explorations of a Theory of Vocational Choice and Achievement: II. A Four-Year Prediction Study. Psychological Reports, 12(2), 547-594.
• Huczynski, A. A., & Buchanan, D. A. (2013). Organizational Behaviour (8. b.). Pearson.
• Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (2005). Some Dynamics of Social Balance Processes:Bringing Heider Back Into Balance Theory. Social Networks, 25, 17–49.
• Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. T. (1984). A Type A-B Person-Work Environment Interaction Model For Examining Occupational Stress and Consequences. Human Relations, 37(7), 491-513.
• Jawahar, I. M., & Carr, D. (2007). Conscientiousness and Contextual Performance The Compensatory Effects of Perceived. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 330-349.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Z. (2020). Dünden Bugüne İnsan ve İnsanlar (23. b.). İstanbul: Evrim Kitap.
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-Organization Fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology(49), 1-49.
• Kristof‐Brown,, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Jhonsan , E. C. (2005). Consequences of Indıvıduals' fit at Work: A Meta‐Analysis of Person–Job, Person–Organization, Person– Group and Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342
• Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The Black Box of Ogranizational Demography. Organization Science, 8(1), 1-22.
• Lawler, E. E., Worley, C. G., & Creelman, D. (2011). Managment Reset Organizing for Sustainable Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Lun, V.-C., & Bond, M. (2006).Achieving Relationship Harmony in Groups and Its Consequence for Group Performance.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,9(3),195-202.
• Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.
• Martins, L. L., Milliken, F. J., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Salgado, S. R. (2003). Racioethnic Diversity and Group Members' Experiences: The Role Of The Racioethnic Diversity Of The Organizational Context. Group & Organization Management, 28(1), 75-106.
• McDonald , P., & Gandz, J. (1991). Identification of Values Relevant to Business Research. Human Resource Management, 30(2), 217-236.
• Metzler, V. L. (2006, Şubat). Organizational Culture:Finding The Rıght Fit. Published Doctoral Thesis,Templete University. ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for Common Threads: Understanding The Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 402–433.
• Montoya, M. R., & Horton, R. S. (2012). A Meta-Analytic Investigation of The Processes Underlying The Similarity-Attraction Effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64–94.
• Motowidlo, S. J., & Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence That Task Performance Should Be Distinguished From Contextual Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
• Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.
• Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-Order Dimensions of The Big Five Personality Traits and The Big Six Vocational Interest Types. Personalpsychology, 447-478.
• Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What Is Person-Environment Congruence? Supplementary Versus Complementary Models of Fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior(31), 268-277.
• Newcomb, T. M. (1979). Reciprocity of Interpersonal Attraction: A Nonconfilrmation of a Plausible Hypothes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(4), 299-306.
• Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of A Theory of Human Problem Solving. Psychological Review, 65(3), 151–166.
• Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. (2016). Job Design Research and Theory: Past, Present and Future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35.
• Oldham, G. R., Hackman, R. J., & Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions Under Which Employees Respond Positively to Enriched Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 39S-403.
• Onay, M. (2011). Çalışanın Sahip Olduğu Duygusal Zekanın ve Duygusal Emeğinin, Görev Performansı ve Bağlamsal Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(4), 587-600.
• Özcan, E. D. (2011). Örgüt Yapısı ve İş Tatmini. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
• Özdemir, E. (2015). İçsel İş Çevresi, Kişilik Özellikleri ve Sektör Algısının İş Tatmini ve İş Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi Alanya Konaklama İşletmeleri Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Wor Group Diversit Conflict, and Performanc. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
• Pelz, D. C. (1956). Some Social Factors Related to Performance in a Research Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(3), 310-325.
• Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational Demography:Implicationsfor Management. California Management Review, 28(1), 67-81.
• Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The Joint Effects of Personality and Job Scope on in-Role Performance, Citizenship Behaviors, and Creativity. Human Relations, 63(7), 981– 1005.
• Rhodewalt, F. (2008). Personality and Social Behavior: An Overview. F. Rhodewalt içinde, Personality and Social Behavior (s. 1-11). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
• Riordan, C. (2000). Relational Demography Within Groups: Past Developments, Contradictions,and New Directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 131-173.
• Robertson, I., Gibbons, P., Baron, H., MacIver, R., & Nyfield, G. (1999). Understanding Management Performance. British Journal of Management, 10, 5–12.
• Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986). The Repulsion Hypothesis: On the Nondevelopment of Relationships. Journal of Peisonality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1156-1166.
• Rotundo, M., & Paul R. Sackett, P. R. (2002). The Relative Importance of Task, Citizenship, and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance:A PolicyCapturing Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80.
• Ryckman , R. M. (2008). Theories of Personality (9. b.). Thomson Wadsworth.
• Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The Structure of Personality Attributes. M. R. Barrick , & A. M. Ryan içinde, Personality and Work Reconsidering the Role of Personality in Organizations (s. 1-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
• Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culturel Leadership (3. b.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Schneider, B. (1987). The People Make The Place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
• Schneider, B., Smith, B., Taylor, S., & Fleenor , J. (1998). Personality and Organizations: A Test of the Homogeneity of Personality Hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 462-470.
• Seong, J. Y., & Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2012). Testing Multidimensional Models of PersonGroup Fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(6), 536-556.
• Seong, J. Y., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Woo Park, W., Seung Hong, D., & Shin, Y. (2015). PersonGroup Fit: Diversity Antecedents,Proximal Outcomes, and Performance at the Group Level. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1184–1213.
• Slowikowski, M. K. (2005, Kasım). Using the DISC Behavioral Instrument to Guide Leadership and Communication. Aorn Journal, 82(5), 835-843.
• Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance Concepts and Performance Theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 23(1), 3-25.
• Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., & Connerley, M. L. (2001). An Investigation of Personality Similarity Effects (Relational and Perceived) on Peer and Supervisor Ratings and The Role of Familiarity and Liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 637–657.
• Sürgevil, O. (2008). Farklılık Kavramına ve Farklılıkların Yönetimine Temel Oluşturan Sosyopsikolojik Kuramlar ve Yaklaşımlar. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(20), 111-124.
• Staples, S. D., & Zhao, L. (2006). The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 389–406.
• Tajfe, H., & Turne, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. J. T. Jost, & J. Sidanius içinde, Political Psychology (s. 276–293). Psychology Press.
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 1-39.
• Tom, V. R. (1971). The Role of Personality and Organizational Images in the Recruiting Process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(5), 573-592.
• Tsuı, A. S., & O’ ReIlly III, C. A. (1989). Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402-423.
• Udin, U., & Yuniawan, A. (2020). Psychological Capital, Personality Traits of Big-Five, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Task Performance: Testing Their Relationships. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7(9), 781-790.
• Varoğlu, D. (2019). Temel İş Özellikleri. S. Yürür (Dü.) içinde, Örgütsel Davranış Kuramları (s. 281-312). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın .
• Vogel, R. M., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Integrating The Levels of Person-Environment Fit: The Roles of Vocational Fit and Group Fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 68–81.
• Yelboğa, A. (2006). Kişilik Özellikleri ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. İş,Güç” Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 8(2), 196-211.
• Yildiz, H., & Kavak, O. (2017). The Regulatory Role of Compassıon ın The Influence of The Personalıty Traıt of Responsıbılıty on Task and Contextual Performance. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistic, 9, 408-422.
• Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of A Theory-Based Measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540-555.
• Werbel, J. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The Use of Person-Group Fit for Employment Selection: A Missing Link in Person-Environmet Fit. Human Resource Management, Fall, 40(3), 227-240.
• Westerman, J. W., & Cyr, L. A. (2004). An Integrative Analysis of Person–Organization Fit Theories. International Journal of Selection and Assesment, 12(3), 252-261.