GÖRSEL KÜLTÜRÜN İZİNDE: SİNEMA ENDÜSTRİSİ ALANINDAKİ YAYINLARIN HARİTALANMASI

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 543 - 568, 17.12.2025

Gülseren Dinvar Pekşen

https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1647783

https://izlik.org/JA26NX85FY

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, "sinema endüstrisi" anahtar kelimesi doğrultusunda Scopus veri tabanında yer alan bilimsel çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizini ortaya koymak ve endüstriye ilişkin sinema çalışmalarının eğilimlerini analiz etmektedir. Bu amaçla Scopus tabanında "cinema industry" anahtar kelimesiyle 1935-2024 yılları arasında yayımlanmış 621 çalışmaya erişim sağlanmıştır. Akademik çalışmaların verileri, program desteği ile oluşturulan görsel haritalar ve tablolar aracılığıyla bibliyometrik yöntemle analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada 314 makale, 122 kitap bölümü, 101 kitap, 42 konferans makalesi, 38 derleme, 11 editörlük, 2 mektup ve 1 kısa anket verisi; ülkelere, yıllara, yazarlara, organizasyonlara göre haritalandırılmıştır. Sinema endüstrisinin teknolojik dönüşümünü uluslararası ölçekte değerlendiren çalışma; sektörün mevcut durumu, gelecek projeksiyonu ve alandaki boşluklara ilişkin önemli bulgular içermektedir. Bu bakımdan Endüstriye ilişkin yeni araştırmaların kapsamını genişletme potansiyeli taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sinema Endüstrisi , Sinema Sosyoekonomisi , Film Çalışmaları

ON THE TRAIL OF VISUAL CULTURE: MAPPING PUBLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF CINEMA INDUSTRY

https://izlik.org/JA26NX85FY

Öz

The aim of the study is to present a bibliometric analysis of the scientific studies in the Scopus database in line with the keyword “cinema industry” and to analyze the trends of cinema studies related to the industry. For this purpose, 621 studies published between 1935 and 2024 with the keyword “cinema industry” in the Scopus database were accessed. The data of academic studies were analyzed by bibliometric method through visual maps and tables created with the support of the program. In the study, 314 articles, 122 book chapters, 101 books, 42 conference papers, 38 reviews, 11 editorials, 2 letters and 1 short survey data were mapped according to countries, years, authors and organizations. The study, which evaluates the technological transformation of the cinema industry on an international scale, contains important findings on the current state of the industry, future projections and gaps in the field. In this respect, it has the potential to expand the scope of new research on the industry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cinema Industry , Cinema Socioeconomics , Film Studies

Kaynakça

• Alforova, Z. I., Marchenko, S. E., Kot, H., Medvedieva, A., & Moussienko, O. (2021). “Impact of digital technologies on the development of modern film production and television”, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities,13(4),https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v13n4.72.
• Allen R. C. and D. Gomery (1985). Film history: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill.
• Aria M. and Cuccurullo C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics,11(4), 959-975.
• Athique, A. (2011). From cinema hall to multiplex: A public history. South Asian Popular Culture, 9(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746681003798037.
• Athique, A. (2017). Transnational audiences: Media reception on a global scale. John Wiley & Sons.
• Aveyard K. (2009). “‘Coming to a cinema near you?’: Digitized exhibition and independent cinemas in Australia” Studies in Australasian Cinema, 3(2), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1386/sac.3.2.191/1.
• Balio T. (2013). Hollywood in the new millennium. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute.
• Balio, T. (1985). The American film industry. University of Wisconsin Press.
• Barman, T. (2025). “Kavanozdaki Adam” Televizyon Mini Dizisinin Monomit Kuramı Üzerinden Analizi. Söylem Filoloji Dergisi, 10(1), 244-262. https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1623773.
• Borgman, C. L. & Furner, J. (2002). “Scholarly communication and bibliometrics”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,36(1), 2-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360102.
• Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62. 1382- 1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
• Collins, F. & Davis, T. (2004). Australian cinema after mabo.Cambridge University Press.
• Cooley, C. (2020). Soundscape of a National Cinema Industry: Filmfarsi and Its Sonic Connections with Egyptian and Indian Cinemas, 1940s–1960s. Film History. 32(3),43–74. https://doi.org/10.2979/filmhistory.32.3.03.
• Davis, P. (2006). Spatial Competition in Retail Markets: Movie Theaters. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(4), 964–982. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25046283.
• De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.
• Dinvar Pekşen, G., & Barman, T. (2024). “Motion capture teknolojileri üzerine bibliyometrik bir araştırma”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(3), 1102-1116. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1466186.
• Falicov. T. L. (2019). Latin American film industries.British Film Instiute.
• Jackel, A. (2004). European film industries.British Film Institute.
• Katz, E., & Nolen, R. D. (2008). The film encyclopedia: [the complete guide to film and the film industry] (6th ed. / rev. by Ronald Dean Nolen). Collins.
• Lorenzen, M. and Täube, F.A. (2008). “Breakout from Bollywood? The roles of social networks and regulation in the evolution of Indian film industry”, Journal of International Management,14(3), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.01.004.
• Merediz-Solà, I. & Bariviera, A.F. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008.
• Mishra, V. (2013). Bollywood cinema: Temples of desire. Routledge.
• Monaco, J. (2002). Bir film nasıl okunur. Oğlak Bilimsel Kitaplar.
• Mosco V. (2009). The political economy of communication.SAGE Publications.
• Newland, P. (2015). British films of the 1970s. Manchester University Press.
• Özbek, M. (2022). “The Netflix Effect on Turkish Television”, in Tetik T., Gürgen Atalay D., Ulusoy N., (eds.), Turkish Cinema and Television Industry in the Digital Streaming. Era-Peter Lang Gmbh.
• Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P. & Verma, N. (2006). “Bibliometric study of literature on bibliometrics”, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 26(1),27-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/dbit.26.1.3672.
• Powdermaker H. (1951). Hollywood, the dream factory: An anthropologist looks at the movie makers. Little Brown and Company.
• Prasad, M. M. (1998). Ideology of the Hindi film: A historical construction. Oxford University Press.
• Rasul, A. (2015). “Violence: Propaganda Model and Political Economy of the Indian Film Industry”, Journal of Media Critiques,1(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.17349/Jmc115304.
• Rolinson, D. (2010). Don't Look Now: British Cinema of the 1970s. Intellect.
• Sedgwick, J., Pokorny, M. and Miskell, P. (2014). “Hollywood in the world market – evidence from Australia in the mid-1930s.”, Business History,56(5),689-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.837891.
• Staiger, J. & Hake, S. (2009). Convergence media history. Routledge.
• Street, S. (2003). British national cinema. Taylor & Francis.
• Teksoy, R. (2005). Rekin Teksoy’un sinema tarihi. Oğlak Yayıncılık.
• Thussu, D. K. (2007). The globalization of “Bollywood”: The hype and the hope. In A. P. Kavoori & A. Punathambekar (eds.), Mapping Bollywood. New York University Press.
• Variety. (March 1, 1915). Film Reviews: The Birth of a Nation. p.23. Retrieved: 15.05.2024-.https://archive.org/details/variety38-1915-03/page/n7/mode/2up.
• Walker, J. (2016). Contemporary British horror cinema: Industry, genre and society. Edinburgh University Press.
• Yılmaz, E. (2002). Bir film nasıl okunur. Presentation.Oğlak Bilimsel Kitaplar.