EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF KNOWLEDGE: SEEKING OPTIMIZATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING

Öz

The phenomenon of global competition and the critical importance of knowledge in terms of explore and exploit force organizations to combine and balance different activities and tools in order to be adapting the environment and being sustainable. Not only the characteristics of knowledge but also features of social capital carry the world business from individual actions to group actions in a network and/or cluster. This study is focused on requirements of organization in order to be efficient learner as well as efficient absorber. The contradictions of the having both identities are given in the study in the frame of exploration and exploitation activity

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Exploration,exploitation,knowledge,learning

BİLGİNİN EDİNİMİ VE YORUMLANMASI: ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENMEDE OPTİMİZASYON ARAYIŞI

Öz

Küresel rekabet olgusu ile -arama ve kullanma anlamında- bilginin kritik önemi, çevreye uyum ve sürdürülebilir olmak adına, örgütleri farklı aktiviteler ve araçları birleştirme ve dengeleme konusunda zorlamaktadır. Yalnızca bilginin karakteri değil, sosyal sermayenin özellikleri de dünya iş piyasasını bir ağ ve/veya küme yapısı içinde bireysel işlemlerden topluluk işlemlerine doğru hareket ettirmektedir. Bu çalışma örgütlerin soğurabildikleri kadar etkin birer öğrenici olabilmeleri için gereksinimleri üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. Her iki kimliğe birde sahip olmanın doğurduğu çelişkiler çalışmada arama ve kullanma aktiviteleri çerçevesinde verilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgi,öğrenme,sürdürülebilirlik,sosyal sermaye

Kaynakça

1. Abernathy, William J. and James M. Utterback (1978) “Patterns of Industrial Innovation”, Technology Review, 81 (June/July), p.41-47.
2. Ahuja, Gautam (2000) “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), p.425-455.
3. Bell, Daniel (1973) The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic.
4. Burt, Ronald S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Cohen, Wesley M. and Daniel A. Levinthal (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, (1990), p.128-152.
6. Coleman, James S. (1988) “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, (1988), p.95-120.
7. Dosi, Giovanni, Franco Malerba, Orietta Marsili and Luigi Orsenigo (1997) “Industrial Structures and Dynamics: Evidence, Interpretations and Puzzles”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, p.3-24.
8. Dyer, Jeffrey H. and Kentaro Nobeoka (2000) “Creating and Managing a High Performance Knowledge Sharing Network: The Case of Toyota”, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue (21), p.345-367.

9. Gilsing, Victor and Bart Nooteboom (2006) “Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation Systems: The Case of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology”, Research Policy, 35(1), p.1-23.
10. Granovetter, Mark S. (1985) “Economic Action and Social Structure, the Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), p. 481-510.
11. Grant, Robert M. (1991) “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage - Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 33(3), p.114-135. Hippel, Eric Von (1994) “‘Sticky Information’ and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation”, Management Science, 40(4), p.429-439.
12. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1992) “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), p.111-25. Lewin, Arie Y., Chris P. Long and Timothy N. Carroll (1999) “The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, 10(5), p.535-550.
13. Levinthal, Daniel A. and James, G. March (1993) “The Myopia of Learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), p.95-112.
14. Malerba, Franco (2002) “Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production”, Research Policy, 31(2), p.247-264.
15. March, James G. (1991) “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, 2(1), p.71-87.
16. Maskel, Peter and Anders Malmberg (2007) “Myopia, Knowledge Development and Cluster Evolution”, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), p.603-618.
17. Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5(1), p.14-37.
18. Nooteboom, Bart (1999) “Innovation and Interfirm Linkages: New Implications for Public Policy”, Research Policy, 28(8), p. 793-805.
19. Nooteboom, Bart (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Nooteboom, Bart (2004) Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach, London: Routledge.
21. Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
22. Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens and David Krackhardt (2000) “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries”, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3), p.369- 386.
23. Senge, Peter M. (1992) “The Leader’s New Work: Building Learning Organizations”, Sloan Management Review, Fall, p.7-23.
24. Uzzi, Brian and Jarrett Spiro (2005) “Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem”, American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), p.447-504.
25. Winter, Sidney G. (1987) “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets”, in The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Ed. D.J. Teece), New York: Ballinger.
26. Zander, Udo and Bruce Kogut (1995) “Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test”, Organization Science, 6(1), p.76-92.