LOCATION SELECTION FOR DISTRUBUTION CENTER IN DISASTER LOGISTICS: AN APPLICATION WITH SMAA-2 METHOD

Öz

There is a need for efficient planning against catastrophic events to be preparedness, response and sudden recovery. One of the basic elements is the proper location of distribution centers to increase the efficiency of logistics planning. Location of disaster distribution centers are location problems that have both qualitative and quantitative criteria inside. As it is possible to reach statistical data about catastrophic events, the criteria and the evaluation of alternative used in this problem, can be analyzed in stochastic structure. In this study, we handled disaster logistics distribution center problem as a multi criteria decision making MCDM location selection problem. As disaster distribution center location selection criteria used in our study have stochastic manners, show uncertainty due to lack of expression and probability distributions, we utilized stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis SMAA-2 method. For this purpose, in this study we suggested a solution approach to select the most suitable location for a disaster distribution center by using SMAA-2 technique. The proposed method is applied to a generic problem

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster ogistics,Distribution Center,Facility Location Selection,Multi Criteria Decision Making,SMAA-2

AFET LOJİSTİĞİ KAPSAMINDA DAĞITIM MERKEZİ İÇİN YER SEÇİMİ: SMAA-2 TEKNİĞİ İLE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Afet olaylarına karşı hazırlıklı olma, ani müdahale ve iyileştirme için etkin bir lojistik planlamaya ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır. Lojistik planlamanın etkinliğinin artırılmasındaki temel unsurlardan birisi de dağıtım merkezlerinin uygun yerleşimidir. Afet dağıtım merkezlerinin yer seçimi, hem niteliksel hem de niceliksel kriterlere sahip yerleşim problemleridir. Afet olaylarıyla ilgili istatistiki verilere ulaşma imkânı olduğundan bu problemde kullanılan kriterler ve alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesi stokastik yapıda incelenebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada afet lojistiği dağıtım merkezi yer seçimi birçok kriterli karar verme ÇKKV problemi olarak ele alınmaktadır. Afet dağıtım merkezi yer seçimi problemlerinin çözümünde kullanılan kriterlerin, belirsizlik göstermesi ve olasılık dağılımlarıyla ifade edilmesi sebebiyle çalışmamızda stokastik çok kriterli kabul edilebilirlik analizi SMAA-2 metodundan yararlanılmaktadır. Bu amaçla, SMAA-2 tekniği ile bir afet dağıtım merkezinin en uygun yer seçimine yönelik bir çözüm yaklaşımı önerilmektedir. Önerilen yöntem örnek bir probleme uygulanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet Lojistiği, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme, Dağıtım Merkezi, SMAA-2, Tesis Yer Seçimi.

Kaynakça

1. Altay, Nezih ve Walter G. Green III (2006) “OR/MS Research in Disaster Operations Management”, European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), s. 475-493.
2. Balcik, Burcu ve Benita M. Beamon (2008) “Facility Location in Humanitarian Relief”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 11(2), s. 101-121.
3. Campbell, Ann Melissa ve Philip C. Jones (2011), “Prepositioning Supplies in Preparation for Disasters”, European Journal of Operational Research, 209(2), s. 156-165.
4. Caunhye, Aakil M., Xiaofeng Nie ve Shaligram Pokharel (2012), “Optimization Models in Emergency Logistics: A Literature Review”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(1), s. 4-13.
5. Chang, Mei-Shiang, Ya-Ling Tseng ve Jing-Wen Chen (2007), “A Scenario Planning Approach for the Flood Emergency Logistics Preparation Problem Under Uncertainty”, Transportation Research Part E, 43(6), s. 737-754.
6. Dekle, Jamie, Mariel S. Lavieri, Erica Martin, Hülya Emir-Farinas ve Richard L. Francis (2005) “A Florida Country Locates Disaster Recovery Centers”, Interfaces, 35(2), s. 133- 139.
7. Duran, Serhan, Marco A. Gutierrez ve Pinar Keskinocak (2011) “Pre-positioning on Emergency items worldwide for CARE International”, Interfaces, 41(3), s. 223-237.
8. Trevor Hale ve Christopher R. Moberg (2005) “Improving Supply Chain Disaster Preparedness: A Decision Process for Secure Site Location”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3), s. 195-207.

9. Hokkanen, Joonas, Risto Lahdelma, Kaisa Miettinen ve Pekka Salminen (1998) “Determining the Implementation Order of a General Plan by Using a Multicriteria Method”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 7(5), s. 273-284.
10. Hokkanen, Joonas, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (1999) “A Multiple Criteria Decision Model for Analyzing and Choosing Among Different Development Patterns for the Helsinki Cargo Harbor”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 33(1), s. 1-23.
11. Hokkanen, Joonas, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (2000) “Multicriteria Decision Support in a Technology Competition for Cleaning Polluted Soil in Helsinki”, Journal of Environmental Management, 60(4), s. 339-348.
12. Hoyois, Philippe, Jean Michel Scheuren, Regina Below ve Debarati Guha-Sapir (2007) Annual Disaster Statistical Review: Numbers and Trends 2006, Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).
13. Kadıoğlu, Mikdat (2008) “Modern, Bütünleşik Afet Yönetimin Temel İlkeleri”, Afet Zararlarını Azaltmanın Temel İlkeleri içinde (der. M. Kadıoğlu ve E. Özdamar), s. 1-34, Ankara: JICA Türkiye Ofisi.
14. Kadziński, Miłosz ve Tommi Tervonen (2013) “Robust Multi-Criteria Ranking with Additive Value Models and Holistic Pair-Wise Preference Statements”, European Journal of Operational Research, 228(1), s. 169-180.
15. Kangas, Annika, Jyrki Kangas, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (2006) “Using SMAA-2 Method with Dependent Uncertainties for Strategic Forest Planning”, Forest Policy and Economics, 9(2), s. 113-125.
16. Kangas, Jyrki, Joonas Hokkanen, Annika Kangas, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (2003) “Applying Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis to Forest Ecosystem Management with Both Cardinal and Ordinal Criteria”, Forest Science, 49(6), s. 928-937.
17. Kangas, Jyrki ve Annika Kangas (2003) “Multicriteria Approval and SMAA-O Method in Natural Resources Decision Analysis with Both Ordinal and Cardinal Criteria”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(1), s. 3-15.
18. Kangas, Jyrki, Ron Store ve Annika Kangas (2005) “Socioecological Landscape Planning Approach and Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis in Multiple-Purpose Forest Management”, Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), s. 603-614.
19. Lahdelma, Risto, Joonas Hokkanen ve Pekka Salminen (1998) “SMAA-Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), s. 137-143.
20. Lahdelma, Risto ve Pekka Salminen (2001) “SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making”, Operations Research, 49(3), s. 444-454.
21. Lahdelma, Risto, Pekka Salminen ve Joonas Hokkanen (2002) “Locating a Waste Treatment Facility by Using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis with Ordinal Criteria”, European Journal of Operational Research, 142(2), s. 345-356.
22. Lahdelma, Risto, Kaisa Miettinen ve Pekka Salminen (2003) “Ordinal Criteria in Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA)”, European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), s. 117-127.
23. Lahdelma, Risto ve Pekka Salminen (2006) “Classifying Efficient Alternatives in SMAA Using Cross Confidence Factors”, European Journal Of Operational Research, 170(1), s. 228-240.
24. Lahdelma, Risto, Simo Makkonen ve Pekka Salminen (2009) “Two Ways to Handle Dependent Uncertainties in Multi-Criteria Decision Problems”, Omega, 37(1), s. 79-92.
25. Menou, Abdellah, Abdelhanine Benallou, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (2010) “Decision Support for Centralizing Cargo at a Moroccan Airport Hub Using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), s. 621-629.
26. Rawls, Carmen Gloria ve Mark Alan Turnquist (2010) “Pre-positioning of Emergency Supplies for Disaster Response”, Transportation Research Part B, 44(4), s. 521-534.
27. Roh, Sae-yeon, Hyun-mi Jang ve Chul-hwan Han (2013) “Warehouse Location Decision Factors in Humanitarian Relief Logistics”, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(1), s. 103-120. Shaluf, Ibrahim Mohamed (2007) “An Overview on the Technological Disasters”, Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(3), s. 380-390.
28. Soon, S. V. (2007) A Two-Stage Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Approach to Pre- Positioning Hurricane Supplies, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Alabama: Auburn Üniversitesi, Endüstri ve Sistem Mühendisliği Bölümü.
29. Tervonen, Tommi, Juscelino Almeida–Dias, José Figueira, Risto Lahdelma ve Pekka Salminen (2005) “SMAA-TRI: A Parameter Stability Analysis Method for ELECTRE TRI”, Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas içinde (der. I. Linkov, G.A. Kiker ve R.J. Wenning), Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Tervonen, Tommi, Joonas Hokkanen ve Risto Lahdelma (2008) “Elevator Planning with Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis”, Omega, 36(3), s. 352-362.
31. Tervonen, Tommi, Igor Linkov, José Rui Figueira, Jeffery Steevens, Mark Chappell ve Myriam Merad (2009) “Risk-based Classification System of Nanomaterials”, Journal of Nanopartical Research, 11(4), s. 757-766.
32. Tervonen, Tommi, Gert Van Valkenhoef, Erik Buskens, Hans L. Hillege ve Douwe Postmus (2011) “A Stochastic Multicriteria Model for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Drug Benefit-Risk Analysis”, Statistics in Medicine, 30(12), s. 1419-1428.
33. Thomas, Anisya S. ve Laura Rock Kopczak (2005) “From Logistics to Supply Chain Management: The Path Forward in the Humanitarian sector”, Fritz Institute, 15, s. 1-15.
34. Thomas, Anisya ve Mitsuko Mizushima (2005) “Logistics Training: Necessity or Luxury?”, Forced Migration Review, 22, s. 60-61.
35. Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, Hsin-Jung Cheng ve Tsung Dow Huang (2007) “Multi-Objective Optimal Planning for Designing Relief Delivery Systems”, Transportation Research Part E, 43(6), s. 673-686. Ukkusuri, Satish V. ve Wilfredo F. Yushimito (2008) “Location Routing Approach for the Humanitarian Prepositioning Problem”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2089(1), s. 18-25.
36. The International Disaster Database Internet Sitesi (2013), Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) 2013, www.emdat.be/classification, Erişim tarihi: 26 Aralık 2013.
37. smaa.fi İnternet Sitesi (tarihsiz) www.smaa.fi/jsmaa Erişim tarihi: 27 Ocak 2014.