A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF GREEN PORT, 2009-2020

Abstract

YEŞİL LİMANLAR ÜZERİNE İÇERİK ANALİZİ, 2009-2020

Öz

İklim değişikliği, kuraklık, enerji kaynaklarının tüketimi gibi küresel sorunlar liman faaliyetlerinin sorgulanmasına sebep olmuştur. Liman operasyonlarının çevre, insan ve ekosistem üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini azaltmak amacıyla limanlar çeşitli stratejiler oluşturmaya başlamıştır. Uluslararası organizasyonların katkıları ve oluşturdukları yasal düzenlemeler ile, liman operasyonları çevreci bir bakış açısıyla yönetilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Alanyazında yeşil liman konusunda yapılan yayınlar da artmaya başlamıştır. Yeşil liman araştırmalarındaki artış göz önüne alındığında, çalışmaların içerik analizinin, alanın gelişimi için faydalı olacağı düşünülmüştür. Bu çalışma, 2009-2020 yılları arasında bilimsel dergilerde yayınlanan makalelerin bir derlemesini sunarak bu amaca katkıda bulunmayı hedeflemektedir. Bulgular, yeşil liman araştırmalarında ilk odak noktasının yeşil liman politikaları, gelişimi, operasyonları ve enerji alanında olduğunu göstermektedir. Son yıllarda araştırmaların artmasıyla birlikte odak noktası daha çok yeşil liman ve enerji, gelişim stratejileri, yeşil liman pazarlaması alanına kaymıştır. Bu çalışma, yeşil liman konusundaki mevcut çalışma alanlarının belirlemeye ve araştırmaların ne yöne doğru evrildiğini göstermeye çalışmıştır. Ayrıca, çalışmanın yeşil liman ile ilgili daha fazla araştırmayı teşvik edeceği ve bu nedenle alanın ilerlemesine katkıda bulunacağı öngörülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Limanlar
• Yeşil Liman
• İçerik Analizi

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, S., ve Durmusoglu, Y. (2020). Improving Competitiveness Level of Turkish Intermodal Ports in The Frame of Green Port Concept: A Case Study. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(2), 203-220.
2. Amerikan Liman Otoriteleri Birliği (AAPA). (2019). Environment and Energy, 18 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/PDFs/Environment%20and%20Energy%209-19.pdf adresinden alındı.
3. Amerikan Liman Otoriteleri Birliği (AAPA). (2019). Embracing the Concept of Sustainability as a Standard Business Practice for Ports and the Association, 18 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://aapa.files.cms-plus.com/PDFs/sustainability_resolutions.pdf adresinden alındı.
4. Aregall, M., G., Bergqvist, R., ve Monios, J. (2018). A Global Review of The Hinterland Dimension of Green Port Strategies. Transportation Research Part D, 59, 23-34.
5. Avrupa Komisyonu. (2011). White Paper on Transport, 15 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/themes/strategies/doc/2011_white_paper/white-paper-illustrated-brochure_en.pdf adresinden alındı.
6. Badurina, P., Cukrov, M., ve Dundovic, C. (2017). Contribution To The Implementation Of “Green Port” Concept In Croatian Seaports. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, 31, 10-17.
7. Bailey, D. ve Solomon, G. (2004). Pollution Prevention at Ports: Clearing the Air. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 749-774.
8. Barnes-Dabban, H., van Tatenhove, J., P., M., van Koppen, K., C., S., A., ve Termeer, K., J., A., M. (2017). Institutionalizing Environmental Reform With Sense-Making: West And Central Africa Ports And The ‘Green Port’ Phenomenon. Marine Policy, 86, 111-120.

9. Berköz, L. ve Tekba, D. (1999). The Role of Ports in The Economic Development of Turkey, 39th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, August 23-27, Dublin, Ireland.
10. Bermúdez, F., M., Laxe, F., G. ve Aguayo-Lorenzo, E. (2020). Port Sustainability in Spain: The Case of Noise. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 8061–8078.
11. Bradley, B. ve Hoyland, R. (2020). Decarbonisation and Shipping: International Maritime Organization Ambitions and Measures, 22 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.hilldickinson.com/insights/articles/decarbonisation-and-shipping-internationalmaritime-organization-ambitions-and adresinden alındı.
12. Bucak, U., ve Kuleyin, B. (2016). A Literature Review on Green Port-Related Studies. he Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation 24-25 Ekim 2016, Bodrum, Muğla, Turkey.
13. Chang, C., C. ve Wang, C., M. (2012). Evaluating the Effects of Green Port Policy: Case Study of Kaohsiung Harbor In Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D, 17, 185-189.
14. Chen, J., Zheng, T., Garg, A., Xu, L., ve Fei, Y. (2019). Alternative Maritime Power application as a green port strategy: Barriers in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 823-837.
15. Chengpeng, W., Di, Z., Xinping, Y., ve Zaili, Y. (2019). A Novel Model For The Quantitative Evaluation Of Green Port Development – A Case Study Of Major Ports In China. Transportation Research Part D, 61, 431-443.
16. Chiu, R., H., Lin, L., H. ve Ting, S., C. (2014). Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 5, 1-12.
17. Cong, L., Zhang, D., Wang, M., Xu, H. ve Li, L. (2020). The Role Of Ports In The Economic Development Of Port Cities: Panel Evidence From China. Transport Policy, 90, 13-21.
18. Čurović, L., Jeram, S., Murovec, J., Novaković, T., Rupnik, K. ve Prezelj, J. (2021). Impact of COVID 19 On Environmental Noise Emitted from The Port. Science of the Total Environment, 756, 1-15.
19. Dai, Q., ve Yang, J. (2020). A Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Approach for Modeling Demand Uncertainty in Green Port-Hinterland Transportation Network Optimization. Symmetry, 12, 1492.
20. Davarzani, H., Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., ve Sarkis, J. (2015). A Review of the Literature of Green Ports and Maritime Logistics. Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., Hensher, D., Sarkis, J. (Eds.) Green Logistics and Transportation: A Sustainable Supply Chain Perspective. (s. 149-158). Springer.
21. Davarzani, H., Fahimnia, B., Bell, M., ve Sarkis, J. (2016). Greening Ports And Maritime Logistics: A Review. Transportation Research Part D, 48, 473-487.
22. De Moura, D., A., ve de Andrade, D., G. (2018). Concepts Of Green Port Operations – One Kind Of Self Diagnosis Method To The Port Of Santos – Brazil. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 9(3), 785-809.
23. Denktaş-Şakar, G. ve Karataş-Çetin, Ç. (2012). Port Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Supply Chains: A Framework on Resource Dependence Theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), 301-320.
24. Di Vaio, A., ve Varriale, L. (2018). Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations. Sustainability, 10, 783- 817.
25. Esmer, S. (2019). Liman ve Terminal Yönetimi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını.
26. ESPO, (2020). Environmental Report 2020, 10 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.espo.be/media/Environmental%20Report-WEB-FINAL.pdf adresinden alındı.
27. Ferrari, C., Percoco, M. ve Tedeschi, A. (2010). Ports and Local Development: Evidence from Italy. International Journal of Transport Economics, 37(1), 9-30.
28. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., ve Yongvanich, K. (2004). Using Content Analysis As A Research Method To Inquire Into Intellectual Capital Reporting. Journal Of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282–293.
29. Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review. Londra: Sage Publications Ltd.
30. Hsieh H., Shannon, S., E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
31. Healy, S. (2020). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Shipping: Waiting for Concrete Progress At IMO Level. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 19 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652754/IPOL_BRI(2020)652754_EN.pdf adresinden alındı.
32. International Maritime Organization. (2018). IMO Action to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From International Shipping, 19 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/IMO%20ACTION%20TO%20REDUCE%20GHG%20EMISSIONS%20FROM%20INTERNATIONAL%20SHIPPING.pdf adresinden alındı.
33. Kotowska, I., Mankowska, M., ve ł Plucinski, M. (2018). Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities. Sustainability, 10, 1-17.
34. Köseoğlu, M. C., ve Solmaz, M. S. (2020). Türkiye ve Dünya Yeşil Liman Ölçütlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, ULK 2019, UDTS 2020 Özel Sayı: 33-57.
35. Lam, J., S., L. ve Gu, Y. (2013). Port Hinterland Intermodal Container Flow Optimisation With Green Concerns: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(3), 257-281.
36. Lam, J., S., L. ve Li, K., X. (2019). Green Port Marketing For Sustainable Growth And Development. Transport Policy, 84, 73-81.
37. Lawer, E. T., Herbeck, J. ve Flitner, M. (2019). Selective Adoption: How Port Authorities in Europe and West Africa Engage with the Globalizing ‘Green Port’ Idea. Sustainability, 11, 5119.
38. Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., ve Beresford, A. (2019). Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D, 72, 47-64.
39. Liu, H., Fu, M., Jin, X., Shang, Y., Shindell, D., Faluvegi, G. Shindell, C. Ve He, K. (2016). Health and Climate Impacts of Ocean-Going Vessels in East Asia. Nature Climate Change, 6, 1037-1042.
40. Liu, P., Wang, C., Xie, J., Mu, D., ve Lim, M., K. (2021). Towards Green Port-Hinterland Transportation: Coordinating Railway and Road Infrastructure in Shandong Province, China. Transportation Research Part D, 94, 1-18.
41. Mallouppas, G., ve Yfantis, E., A. (2021). Decarbonization in Shipping Industry: A Review of Research, Technology Development, and Innovation Proposals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(4), 1-40.
42. Maritz, A., Shieh, C., J. ve Yeh, S., P. (2014). Innovation and Success Factors in the Construction of Green Ports. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 15(3), 1255-1263.
43. Merk, O. (2014). Shipping Emissions in Ports. International Transport Forun Discussion Papers, 19 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jrw1ktc83r1-en.pdf?expires=1618861935&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=B1A624017F0ACD9F9C72DFF082907FA3 adresinden alındı.
44. Moros-Daza, A., Amaya-Mier, R., ve Paternina-Arboleda, C. (2020). Port Community Systems: A structured literature review. Transportation Research Part A, 133, 27-46.
45. Munim, Z., H., Somn-Friese, H., ve Dushenko, M. (2020). Identifying The Appropriate Governance Model For Green Port Management: Applying Analytic Network Process And Best-Worst Methods To Ports In The Indian Ocean Rim. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122156.
46. OECD (2011), Environmental Impacts of International Shipping: The Role of Ports, OECD Publishing.
47. Özispa, N., ve Arabelen, G. (2018). Sustainability issues in ports: content analysis and review of the literature (1987- 2017). SHS Web of Conferences, 58, 01022.
48. Pavlic, B., Cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckaj, M., ve Kandus, B. (2014). Sustainable Port Infrastructure, Practical Implementation Of The Green Port Concept. Thermal Science, 18(3), 935-948.
49. Peng, Y., Liu, H., Li, X., Huang, J., Wang, W. (2020). Machine Learning Method For Energy Consumption Prediction Of Ships In Port Considering Green Ports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121564.
50. Peng, Y., Zhao, X., Zuo, T., Wang, W., ve Song, X. (2021). A systematic literature review on port LNG bunkering station. Transportation Research Part D, 91, 1-23.
51. Port of Antwerp, Climate Action, 23 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.portofantwerp.com/en/climate-action adresinden alındı.
52. Port of Rotterdam. Carbon Neutral in 3 Steps, 23 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/doing-business/port-of-the-future/energy-transition/carbon-neutral adresinden alındı.
53. Radwan, M., E., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Zheng, T., Hua, C., Huang, X. (2019). Critical Barriers To The İntroduction Of Shore Power Supply For Green Port Development: Case Of Djibouti Container Terminals. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 1293–1306.
54. Rødseth, K., L., Schøyen, H., ve Wangsness, P., B. (2020). Decomposing Growth in Norwegian Seaport Container Throughput and Associated Air Pollution. Transportation Research Part D, 85, 1-21.
55. Sadek, I., ve Elgohary, M. (2020). Assessment Of Renewable Energy Supply For Green Ports With A Case Study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 5547–5558.
56. Satır, T., ve Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N. (2018). The Protection of Marine Aquatic Life: Green Port (EcoPort) Model inspired by Green Port Concept in Selected Ports from Turkey, Europe and the USA. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 6(1), 120-129.
57. Shaikh, S., M., S., Tagde, J., P., Singh, P., R., Dutta, S., Sangolkar, L., N. ve Kumar, M., S. (2021). Impact of Port and Harbour Activities on Plankton Distribution and Dynamics: A Multivariate Approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 165, 1-14.
58. Sislian, L., Jaegler, A., ve Cariou, P. (2016). A Literature Review On Port Sustainability and Ocean's Carrier Network Problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19-26. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics. New York: Routledge.
59. Suri, H., ve Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in Research Systhesis Methods: From A Methodologically Inclusive Perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395-430.
60. Teerawattana, R., ve Yang, Y., C. (2019). Environmental Performance Indicators for Green Port Policy Evaluation: Case Study of Laem Chabang Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1), 63-69.
61. Tsai C., Wen, M., L. (2005). Research and Trends in Science Education From 1998 To 2002: A Content Analysis of Publication in Selected Journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3–14.
62. Tseng, P., H., ve Pilcher, N. (2019). Evaluating the Key Factors of Green Port Policies in Taiwan Through Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Transport Policy, 82, 127-137.
63. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanliği Strateji Ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2019). Onbirinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), 15 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/OnbirinciKalkinmaPlani.pdf adresinden alındı.
64. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı, Yeşil Liman, 19 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://denizcilik.uab.gov.tr/yesil-liman adresinden alındı.
65. TÜRKLİM (2018). Çevre Dostu Yeşil Liman Sertifikaları Sahiplerini Buldu, 15 Nisan 2021 tarihinde http://www.turklim.org/cevre-dostu-yesil-liman-sertifikalari-sahiplerini-buldu/ adresinden alındı.
66. Yang, Y., C. (2015). Determinants Of Container Terminal Operation From A Green Port Perspective. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(3), 319-346.
67. Wan, Z., Zhang, T., Sha, M., Guo, W., Jin, Y., Guo, J., ve Liu, Y. (2021). Evaluation of Emission Reduction Strategies for Berthing Containerships: A Case Study of The Shekou Container Terminal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 299, 1-12.
68. Wang, W., Huang, L., Gu, J., ve Jiang, L. (2019). Green Port Project Scheduling with Comprehensive Efficiency Consideration. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(8), 967-981.
69. World Ports Sustainability Program (WPSP) Charter. (2018), 15 Nisan 2021 tarihinde https://sustainableworldports.org/about/ adresinden alındı.
70. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future, New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Zhu, L., L., J., Ye, G., ve Feng, X. (2018). Development of Green Ports with the Consideration of Coastal Wave Energy. Sustainability, 10(11), 4270.