BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 28, 01.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28

Öz

Sustainability reporting has become an institutionalized tool for transferring the performance of a company in environmental, financial and social performance, unfortunately, lack of common port sustainability indicators PSI used by all ports in port sustainability reports, is the main motivation of this study. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to decide prevalently used port sustainability indicators in the sustainability reporting process by measuring their usage frequency and to suggest PSIs set to the ports for future sustainability reports. To reach that aim of the study, first port sustainability indicators that focused on port sustainability measurement in current literature will be gathered together to obtain sub-dimensions of sustainability, then 7 different ports sustainability reports which published in 2014 will be analyzed via the NVivo 8 software programme. At the end, the most used and unused port sustainability indicators PSIs in the sustainability reporting process will be identified under the three main dimensions of sustainability. One of the important results of the study is; 34 of the 60 PSI’s that identified are not included in any port sustainability report. In the last part of the study, research limitations and suggestions for future studies are included

Kaynakça

  • Acciaro, Michele, Vanelslander, Thierry, Sys, Christa, Ferrari, Athena, Roumboutsos, Guiliano, Genevieve, Lam, Jasmine, Siu, Lee and Kapros, Serapri (2014). “Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: A Framework for Successful Innovation”. Maritime Policy and Management, 41(5), p. 480-500.
  • Bakla, Arif ve Demir, Selçuk Bekir (2015). NVIVO ile Nitel Veri Analizi. Anı Yayıncılık. Ankara, 2015.
  • Bergmans, Anne, Vandermoere, Frederic, and Loots, IIse (2014). “Co-Producing Sustainability Indicators for the Port of Antwerp: How Sustainability Reporting Creates New Discursive Spaces for Concern and Mobilization”. ESSACHESS-Journal for Communication Studies, 7(1), p. 107-123.
  • Bremen Ports, (2014). Sustainability Report. Germany: www.bremenports.de.
  • Broesterhuizen, E. F. M., Vellinga, Tiego, Docters van Leeuwen, Linda, Zwakhals, J. W., Taneja, P., and Nijdam, Michiel (2012). “Sustainability as a Procurement Criterion for Port Investments”. CESUN2012, Delft.
  • Darbra, Rosa, Mari, Ronza, A., Stojanovic, Timothy, Andrew, Wooldridge, Chris and Casal, J., (2005). “A Procedure for Identifying Significant Environmental Aspects in Sea Ports”. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50 (8), p. 866–874.
  • Dublin Port Company, (2014). Sustainability Report: Our Route to a Greener Port. Ireland: www.dublinport.ie.
  • Gerede, Ender. (2006). Havacılık Emniyeti ve Havacılık Güvenliği Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki ve Farkların Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. İşletme İktisadi Enstitüsü Dergisi Yönetim, 17, p. 54.
  • GRI, (2018). “About Sustainability Reporting”. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability-reporting/Pages/default.aspx, 13.04.2018.
  • Hakam, Moulay, Hicham and Solvang, Wei, Deng (2013). “Container Ports Sustainability: A Literature Review”. In Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 803-810. December 2013.
  • Hakam, Moulay, Hicham (2015). “Nordic Container Port Sustainability Performance: A Conceptual Intelligent Framework”. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(01), p. 14- 23.
  • Hamburg Port Authority, (2014). Sustainability Report 2013/2014. Germany: www.hamburg-port-authority.de.
  • Hernández, Alma, Lucia, Garcia, Roof, A. G., Laurent, Benjamin, Rosa, M. De, Maries, O. and Durel, Yann (2012). Sustainable Port Development–The Port of Aalborg Case. (Unpublished First Semester Master’s Project). Denmark: Environmental Management and Sustainability Science.
  • Kriaa, Siwar, Pietre-Ludoviç, Cambacedes, Bouissou, Marc and Halgand, Yoran, (2015). A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 139, p. 156-178.
  • Milman, Anita and Short, Anne (2008). “Incorporating Resilience into Sustainability Indicators: An Example for the Urban Water Sector”. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), p. 758-767.
  • Peris-Mora, E., Orejas, J.M.Diez, Subirats, A., Ibanez, S. and Alvarez, P., (2005). “Development of a System of Indicators for Sustainable Port Management”. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, p. 1649-1660.
  • Port Authority of a Coruna, (2014). Port of Coruna Sustainability Report. Spain: www.puertocoruna.com.
  • Port of Cork, (2014). Environmental Report 2013: Towards Environmental Excellence. Ireland: www.portofcork.ie.
  • Port of Gothenburg, (2014). Sustainable Port: Sustainability Report of Gothenburg Port Authority. Scandinavia: www.portofgothenburg.com. Port
  • www.portmtrovancouver.com. (2014). Sustainability Report 2014.
  • Canada: Shiaui, Tzay-An and Chuang, Chia-Chin (2015). “Social Construction of Port Sustainability Indicators: A Case Study of Keelung Port”. Maritime Policy and Management, 42(1), p. 26-42. Sislian, Lucie, Jaegler, Anicia and Cariou, Pierre (2016). “A Literature Review on Port Sustainability and Ocean's Carrier Network Problem”. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, p. 19-26.
  • Tanzil, Dicksen and Beloff, Beth, R. (2006). “Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics”. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), p. 41-56.
  • The Port of Los Angeles, (2014). Port of Los Angeles Sustainability Report 2013/2014. California: www.portoflosangeles.org.
  • Turcu, Catalina (2013). Re-thinking Sustainability Indicators: Local Perspectives of Urban Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), p. 695-719. Valencia
  • Valencia:www.valenciaport.com. Authority, (2014). Sustainability Report
  • Yadava, Ram, Nayan and Sinha, Bhaskar (2016). “Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies”. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), p. 549-558.
  • Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), p. 1-9.
  • Wong, L. (2008). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: A Brief Guide to Using Nvivo. Malaysian Family Physician: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 3(1), p. 14–20.

ÜRDÜRÜLEBILIRLIK RAPORLAMA SÜRECINDE LIMAN SÜRDÜRÜLEBILIRLIK GÖSTERGELERININ DEĞERLENDIRILMESI

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 28, 01.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28

Öz

Sürdürülebilirlik raporlamasının, bir şirketin ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal konulardaki performansını iletmenin kurumsallaşmış bir aracı haline gelmesine rağmen, güncel liman sürdürülebilirlik raporları incelendiğinde tüm limanlar tarafından kullanılan ortak liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergeleri PSI ’nin olmayışı bu çalışmanın temel motivasyonu olmuştur. Bu yüzden bu çalışmanın amacı; sürdürülebilirlik raporlarındaki kullanım sıklıklarını ölçerek yoğun olarak kullanılan liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergelerine karar vermek ve sektör uygulayıcılarına gelecek sürdürülebilirlik raporları için kullanılabilecek liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergeleri seti önermek olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu amaca ulaşmak için, öncelikle mevcut yazındaki, sürdürülebilirlik ölçümü üzerine odaklanmış liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergeleri derlenmiş ve sürdürülebilirlik alt-kriterleri elde edilmiştir, sonra 7 farklı limanın 2014 yılında yayınlanan sürdürülebilirlik raporları NVIVO 8 yazılımı aracılığı ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçta, sürdürülebilirlik raporlaması sırasında en çok kullanılan ve hiç kullanılmayan liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergeleri, sürdürülebilirliğin üç temel boyutuna göre tanımlanmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk kısmında belirlenen 60 liman sürdürülebilirlik göstergesinin 34 tanesinin çalışma kapsamında analiz edilen hiçbir liman sürdürülebilirlik raporunda yer almaması çalışmanın dikkat çekici sonuçlarındandır. Çalışmanın son bölümünde araştırma kısıtları ve gelecek çalışmalar için önerilere yer verilmiştir

Kaynakça

  • Acciaro, Michele, Vanelslander, Thierry, Sys, Christa, Ferrari, Athena, Roumboutsos, Guiliano, Genevieve, Lam, Jasmine, Siu, Lee and Kapros, Serapri (2014). “Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: A Framework for Successful Innovation”. Maritime Policy and Management, 41(5), p. 480-500.
  • Bakla, Arif ve Demir, Selçuk Bekir (2015). NVIVO ile Nitel Veri Analizi. Anı Yayıncılık. Ankara, 2015.
  • Bergmans, Anne, Vandermoere, Frederic, and Loots, IIse (2014). “Co-Producing Sustainability Indicators for the Port of Antwerp: How Sustainability Reporting Creates New Discursive Spaces for Concern and Mobilization”. ESSACHESS-Journal for Communication Studies, 7(1), p. 107-123.
  • Bremen Ports, (2014). Sustainability Report. Germany: www.bremenports.de.
  • Broesterhuizen, E. F. M., Vellinga, Tiego, Docters van Leeuwen, Linda, Zwakhals, J. W., Taneja, P., and Nijdam, Michiel (2012). “Sustainability as a Procurement Criterion for Port Investments”. CESUN2012, Delft.
  • Darbra, Rosa, Mari, Ronza, A., Stojanovic, Timothy, Andrew, Wooldridge, Chris and Casal, J., (2005). “A Procedure for Identifying Significant Environmental Aspects in Sea Ports”. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50 (8), p. 866–874.
  • Dublin Port Company, (2014). Sustainability Report: Our Route to a Greener Port. Ireland: www.dublinport.ie.
  • Gerede, Ender. (2006). Havacılık Emniyeti ve Havacılık Güvenliği Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki ve Farkların Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. İşletme İktisadi Enstitüsü Dergisi Yönetim, 17, p. 54.
  • GRI, (2018). “About Sustainability Reporting”. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability-reporting/Pages/default.aspx, 13.04.2018.
  • Hakam, Moulay, Hicham and Solvang, Wei, Deng (2013). “Container Ports Sustainability: A Literature Review”. In Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on IEEE. pp. 803-810. December 2013.
  • Hakam, Moulay, Hicham (2015). “Nordic Container Port Sustainability Performance: A Conceptual Intelligent Framework”. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(01), p. 14- 23.
  • Hamburg Port Authority, (2014). Sustainability Report 2013/2014. Germany: www.hamburg-port-authority.de.
  • Hernández, Alma, Lucia, Garcia, Roof, A. G., Laurent, Benjamin, Rosa, M. De, Maries, O. and Durel, Yann (2012). Sustainable Port Development–The Port of Aalborg Case. (Unpublished First Semester Master’s Project). Denmark: Environmental Management and Sustainability Science.
  • Kriaa, Siwar, Pietre-Ludoviç, Cambacedes, Bouissou, Marc and Halgand, Yoran, (2015). A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 139, p. 156-178.
  • Milman, Anita and Short, Anne (2008). “Incorporating Resilience into Sustainability Indicators: An Example for the Urban Water Sector”. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), p. 758-767.
  • Peris-Mora, E., Orejas, J.M.Diez, Subirats, A., Ibanez, S. and Alvarez, P., (2005). “Development of a System of Indicators for Sustainable Port Management”. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, p. 1649-1660.
  • Port Authority of a Coruna, (2014). Port of Coruna Sustainability Report. Spain: www.puertocoruna.com.
  • Port of Cork, (2014). Environmental Report 2013: Towards Environmental Excellence. Ireland: www.portofcork.ie.
  • Port of Gothenburg, (2014). Sustainable Port: Sustainability Report of Gothenburg Port Authority. Scandinavia: www.portofgothenburg.com. Port
  • www.portmtrovancouver.com. (2014). Sustainability Report 2014.
  • Canada: Shiaui, Tzay-An and Chuang, Chia-Chin (2015). “Social Construction of Port Sustainability Indicators: A Case Study of Keelung Port”. Maritime Policy and Management, 42(1), p. 26-42. Sislian, Lucie, Jaegler, Anicia and Cariou, Pierre (2016). “A Literature Review on Port Sustainability and Ocean's Carrier Network Problem”. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, p. 19-26.
  • Tanzil, Dicksen and Beloff, Beth, R. (2006). “Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics”. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), p. 41-56.
  • The Port of Los Angeles, (2014). Port of Los Angeles Sustainability Report 2013/2014. California: www.portoflosangeles.org.
  • Turcu, Catalina (2013). Re-thinking Sustainability Indicators: Local Perspectives of Urban Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), p. 695-719. Valencia
  • Valencia:www.valenciaport.com. Authority, (2014). Sustainability Report
  • Yadava, Ram, Nayan and Sinha, Bhaskar (2016). “Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies”. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), p. 549-558.
  • Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with data: Using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), p. 1-9.
  • Wong, L. (2008). Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: A Brief Guide to Using Nvivo. Malaysian Family Physician: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 3(1), p. 14–20.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Nergis Özispa Bu kişi benim

Gamze Arabelen Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Özispa, N., & Arabelen, G. (2018). ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 6(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28
AMA Özispa N, Arabelen G. ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. Haziran 2018;6(1):1-28. doi:10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28
Chicago Özispa, Nergis, ve Gamze Arabelen. “ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 6, sy. 1 (Haziran 2018): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28.
EndNote Özispa N, Arabelen G (01 Haziran 2018) ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 6 1 1–28.
IEEE N. Özispa ve G. Arabelen, “ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS”, Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, c. 6, sy. 1, ss. 1–28, 2018, doi: 10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28.
ISNAD Özispa, Nergis - Arabelen, Gamze. “ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 6/1 (Haziran 2018), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28.
JAMA Özispa N, Arabelen G. ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2018;6:1–28.
MLA Özispa, Nergis ve Gamze Arabelen. “ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, c. 6, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 1-28, doi:10.14514/BYK.m.21478082.2018.6/1.1-28.
Vancouver Özispa N, Arabelen G. ASSESSMENT OF PORT SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PROCESS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2018;6(1):1-28.