Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

David Lewis’ Best System Analysis and CP Laws

Yıl 2019, , 1 - 12, 28.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429

Öz

In this paper, I aim to explore Lewis’s best system analysis and how it can accommodate laws with exceptions. The Best System Account has been introduced to provide an alternative view for both minimalist and counterfactual theories of regularities. Simple regularity theory faces problems in which there is some generalization that seems to be a law or some regularities that are established accidentally. It tries to exclude the accidental generalization from the account. However, the best system analysis can solve the problem of how to distinguish between laws and accidents.

Kaynakça

  • Brandon, D.-M. (2001). Lossy Laws. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Brewka, G. (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Callender, C. & Cohen, J. (2010). Special Sciences, Conspiracy and the Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Erkenntnis, 73, 427-447.
  • Cohen, J. & Callender, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1-34.
  • Delgrande, J. P. (1998). On First-Order Conditional Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 105, 105-137.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Lewis, D. (1986). Postscript to “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114-132.
  • Pelletier, F. J. & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and Defaults. Handbook of Logic and Language. (Eds. J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1125-1177.
  • Schrenk, M. (2006). A Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. H. Bohse & S. Walter). Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schrenk, M. (2007). The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.
  • Schrenk, M. (2008). A Lewisian Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. D. Bohse & K. Dreimann, & S. Walter). 6th International Congress of the Society for Analytic Philosophy. Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. Erkenntnis, 57, 351-372.
  • Unterhuber, M. (2014). Do Ceteris Paribus Laws Exist? A Regularity-Based Best System Analysis. Erkenntnis, 79, 1833-1847.
  • Weatherson, B. (2014). David Lewis. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis.
Yıl 2019, , 1 - 12, 28.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Brandon, D.-M. (2001). Lossy Laws. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Brewka, G. (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Callender, C. & Cohen, J. (2010). Special Sciences, Conspiracy and the Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Erkenntnis, 73, 427-447.
  • Cohen, J. & Callender, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1-34.
  • Delgrande, J. P. (1998). On First-Order Conditional Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 105, 105-137.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Lewis, D. (1986). Postscript to “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114-132.
  • Pelletier, F. J. & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and Defaults. Handbook of Logic and Language. (Eds. J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1125-1177.
  • Schrenk, M. (2006). A Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. H. Bohse & S. Walter). Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schrenk, M. (2007). The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.
  • Schrenk, M. (2008). A Lewisian Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. D. Bohse & K. Dreimann, & S. Walter). 6th International Congress of the Society for Analytic Philosophy. Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. Erkenntnis, 57, 351-372.
  • Unterhuber, M. (2014). Do Ceteris Paribus Laws Exist? A Regularity-Based Best System Analysis. Erkenntnis, 79, 1833-1847.
  • Weatherson, B. (2014). David Lewis. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Felsefe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ömer Fatih Tekin 0000-0002-1142-2706

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Mart 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Tekin, Ö. F. (2019). David Lewis’ Best System Analysis and CP Laws. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429