The Relationship between Trade Openness-Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of BRICS-T Countries

Yıl 2022, , 109 - 146, 29.08.2022

Tuğba Karaca Nermin Güney , Sertaç Hopoğlu

https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.937591

Cited By: 2

Öz

With globalization, the volume of goods and capital moving across borders has increased worldwide. In order to benefit from this increase, countries that implement export-oriented growth policies and policies that facilitate the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) can achieve high economic growth rates. This study aims to contribute to the literature by investigating the trade openness, foreign direct investment and growth nexus in the group of emerging market economies called BRICS-T (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Turkey) for the period 1992-2019 using panel data analysis methods. As a result of the analysis, a bidirectional Granger causality was found between trade openness and growth and a one-way Granger causality relationship from growth to foreign direct investments. However, causality relationships between trade openness and foreign direct investment are only found in India and South Africa. In addition, one-way causality relationships, running from growth to trade openness and from growth to foreign direct investment, were found for Turkey. The findings of the study imply that trade openness may have an indirect effect on foreign direct investment through economic growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

FDI, trade openness, growth, panel data analysis, BRICS, Turkey

Ticari Dışa Açıklık-Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: BRICS-T Ülkeleri Örneği

Öz

Küreselleşme ile birlikte tüm dünyada sınırlararası hareket eden malların ve sermayenin hacmi artmıştır. Bu artıştan faydalanmak için ihracat odaklı büyüme ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımların girişini kolaylaştıran politikalar uygulayan ülkeler yüksek bir ekonomik büyüme hızı yakalayabilmektedirler. Bu çalışma BRICS-T (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye) olarak adlandırılan yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde ticari açıklığın ve doğrudan yabancı yatırım ve büyüme ilişkisini 1992-2019 dönemi için panel veri analizi yöntemleri ile inceleyerek literatüre katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, BRICS-T ülkelerinden oluşan panel için çalışma döneminde ticari açıklık ve büyüme arasında çift yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi ve büyümeden doğrudan yabancı yatırımlara doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte, sadece Hindistan ve Güney Afrika için ticari açıklık ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar arasında nedensellik ilişkilerine rastlanmıştır. Türkiye için büyümeden ticari açıklığa ve büyümeden doğrudan yabancı yatırımlara doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkileri bulunmuştur. Çalışmanın bulguları panel için ticari dışa açıklığın doğrudan yabancı yatırımları dolaylı olarak büyüme üzerinden etkileyebileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DYY, ticari açıklık, büyüme, panel veri analizi, BRICS, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Aizenmann, J. & Noy, I. (2005). FDI and Trade - Two Way Linkages?, Working Paper, No. 598, University of California, Economics Department, Santa Cruz, CA
• Aktan, C.C. & Vural, İ. (2013). Dolaysız yabancı yatırımların makroekonomik etkileri. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 44-62.
• Asiedu, E. (2001). On the Determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries: Is Africa different?. World Development, 30(1), 107-119.
• Aytun, C. & Akın, C.S. (2014). OECD ülkelerinde telekomünikasyon altyapısı ve ekonomik büyüme: yatay kesit bağımlı heterojen panel nedensellik analizi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 29(340), 69-96.
• Bakır, H. & Eryılmaz, F. (2015). Causal relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey, Handbook of Research on Strategic Developments and Regulatory Practice in Global Finance (Ed. Özlem Olgu), USA: IGI-Global Publishing, 319- 330.
• Balasubramanyam, V. N., Salisu, M. & Sapsford, D. (1996). Foreign direct ınvestment and growth in EP and IS countries. The Economic Journal, 106 (434), 92-105.
• Basu, P. & Guariglia, A. (2007). Foreign direct İnvestment, inequality, and growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29(4), 824-839.
• Basu, P., Chakraborty, C., & Reagle, D. (2003). Liberalization, FDI, and growth in developing countries: a panel cointegration approach. Economic Inquiry, 41(3), 510-516.
• Belloumi, M. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems, (38), 269–287.
• Bhagwati, J. N. (1978). Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes, Vol. I, Studies in International Economic Relations, No. I0, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Christophe, E. & M. Llorca, (2017). Fiscal sustainability in Central And Latin America countries: evidence from a panel cointegration approach. Economics Bulletin, 37(4): 2292-2300.
• Çevik, E.İ., Atukeren, E. & Korkmaz, T. (2019). Trade openness and economic growth in turkey: a rolling frequency domain analysis. Economies 7 (2): 41, https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020041
• Dao, A.T. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth, The Park Place Economist, 23(1), https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace/vol23/iss1/11.
• Dar, A. & Amirkhalkhali, S. (2003). On the impact of trade openness on growth: further evidence from OECD countries, Applied Economics, 35(16), 1761-1766, DOI: 10.1080/0003684032000129020.
• De Mello, Jr., Luiz R. (1999). Foreign direct ınvestment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers, 51 (1), 133-151.
• Dinh T.T-H., Vo D.H., The Vo A. & Nguyen T.C (2019). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the Short Run and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 12(4): 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12040176.
• Dowrick, S. & Golley, J. (2004). Trade openness and growth: who benefits?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20 (1), 38-56.
• Dritsaki, M. & Dritsaki, C. (2020). Trade openness and economic growth: a panel data analysis of Baltic countries. Asian Economic and Finanial Review, 10(3), 313-324.
• Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4): 1450-1460.
• Eğilmez, M.(2018), https://www.mahfiegilmez.com/2018/07/uluslararas-dogrudan-yatrmlar.html. Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021
• Emirmahmutoglu, F. & N.Kose, (2011). Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Economic Modelling, 28 (3): 870-876.
• Encinas-Ferrer, C. & Villegas-Zermeño, E. (2015). Foreign direct investment and gross domestic product growth. International Conference on Applied Economics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 198-207.
• Erataş, F., Başcı Nur, H., & Özçalık, M. (2013). Feldstein-Horioka bilmecesinin gelişmiş ülke ekonomileri açısından değerlendirilmesi: panel veri analizi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 18-33.
• Fetahi-Vehapi, M., Sadiku, L. & Petkovski, M. (2015). Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth: An Evidence for South East European Countries, presented at The Economies of Balkan and Eastern Europe Countries in the changed world, EBEEC 2014, Nis, Serbia, Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 17 – 26.
• Göçer, İ., Mercan, M. & Hotunluoğlu, H. (2012). Seçilmiş OECD ülkelerinde cari işlemler açığının sürdürülebilirliği: yatay kesit bağımlılığı altında çoklu yapısal kırılmalı panel veri analizi, Maliye Dergisi, 163 (Temmuz-Aralık), 449-467.
• Gries, T. & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis. Working Papers CIE 52, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
• Groh, A.P. & Wich, M. (2012). Emerging economies’ attraction of foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review, 13, 210-229.
• Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (2003). Dış Ticaret, Bilgi Taşmaları ve Büyüme. Adem Üzümcü (Çev.), C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2). 187-198.
• Herzer, D. (2012). How does foreign direct investment really affect developing countries’ growth? Review of International Economics, 20(2), 396–414.
• Hopoğlu, S. (2019). Are Youth Labor, Trade Openness and Foreign Direct Investment Effective in Economic Growth of CIVETS Countries? A Panel Causality Analysis, in “Smaller World, Bigger Issues: Growth, Unemployment, Inequality and Poverty” ( H. Kirer Silva Lecuna, Ed.), 63-80, Berlin: Peter Lang.
• Hye, Q. M., & Lau, W.-Y. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth: empirical evidence from India. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 188-205.
• Iamsiraroj, S. (2016). The foreign direct investment-economic growth nexus. International Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 116-133.
• Ibrahim, M., Koomson, I., Aluko O.A. & Opoku, E.E.O. (2021). Re–examining Bhagwati hypothesis: the case of some selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, Transnational Corporations Review, 13:3, 334-345, DOI: 10.1080/19186444.2020.1863702
• Im, K. S., M.H. Pesaran, & Y. Shin, (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
• Jalil, A. & Rauf, A. (2021). Revisiting the link between trade openness and economic growth using panel methods, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2021.1938638.
• Jawaid S.T., (2014). Trade openness and economic growth: a lesson from Pakistan. Foreign Trade Review, 49(2):193-212.
• Johnson, A. (2006). The Effects of FDI Inflows on Host Country Economic Growth, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 58, January 2006.
• Kar, M., Nazlıoğlu, Ş. ve Ağır, H. (2014). Trade openness, financial development and economic growth in Turkey: linear and nonlinear causality analysis. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 8(1), 63-86.
• Keho, Y. (2017). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire, Cogent Economics & Finance, 5:1, 1332820.
• Kılıç, M. (2020). Portföy yatırımları ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımların ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: yeni sanayileşen ülkeler örneği. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD), 7(8), 45-55.
• Koçbulut, Ö. & Altıntaş, H. (2016). İkiz açıklar ve Feldstein-Horioka hipotezi: OECD ülkeleri üzerine yatay kesit bağımlılığı altında yapısal kırılmalı panel eşbütünleşme analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 145-174.
• Kohpaiboon, A. (2003). Foreign trade regimes and the FDI–Growth Nexus: a case study of Thailand. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 55-69.
• Kurt, S., & Berber, M. (2008). Türkiye’de dışa açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 57-80.
• Lee, C.C. & Chang, C.P. (2009). FDI, financial development, and economic growth: international evidence. Journal of Applied Economics, 12(2), 249-271.
• Liu, X., Burridge, P. & Sinclair, P.J. (2002). Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 34, 1433-1440.
• Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu, (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1): 631-652.
• Makki, S.S. & Somwaru, A. (2004). Impact of foreign direct ınvestment and trade on economic growth: evidence from developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(3), 795-801.
• Mehic, E., Silajdzic, S. & Babic-Hodovic, V. (2013). The ımpact of FDI on economic growth: some evidence from Southeast Europe. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49 (sup1), 5-20, DOI: 10.2753/REE1540-496X4901S101.
• Mehrara, M., Rahmani, T. & Vajari, A.N. (2013). Economic growth, openness and foreign direct investment in oil-rich countries, Hyperion Economic Journal, I(3-1), 3-8.
• Menyah, K., Nazlioglu, S. & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: New insights from a panel causality approach, Economic Modelling, 27, 386-394.
• Miller, S. M., & Upadhyay, M. P. (2000). The effects of trade orientation and human capital on total factor productivity. Journal of Development Economics, 63(2), 399-423.
• Mina, W. (2007). The location determinants of FDI in the GCC countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management,(17), 336-348.
• Moudatsou, A. & Kyrkilis, D. (2011). FDI and economic growth: causality for the EU and ASEAN, Journal of Economic Integration, 26(3), 554-577.
• Musila, J.W. & Yiheyis, Z. (2015). The impact of trade openness on growth: The case of Kenya, Journal of Policy Modeling, 37, 342-354.
• Nannicini, T. & Billmeier, A. (2011). Economies in transition: how ımportant is trade openness for growth?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73: 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00626.x
• Noyan Yalman, İ. & Koşaroğlu, Ş.M (2017). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların ekonomik büyüme ve işsizlik üzerindeki etkisi. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 1(2), 191-205.
• Okuyan H.A & Erbaykal E. (2008). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 19(67), 47-58.
• Omisakin, O., Adeniyi, O. & Omojolaibi, A. (2009). Foreign direct ınvestment, trade openness and growth in Nigeria. Journal of Economics Theory, 3: 13-18.
• Osei, D.B., Sare, Y.A. & Ibrahim, M. (2019). On the determinants of trade openness in low‑ and lower–middle‑income countries in Africa: how important is economic growth?, Future Business Journal, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-019-0002-8.
• Öncü, E. & Çelik, Ş. (2018). doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: BRICT ülkeleri panel nedensellik analizi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 17. UİK Özel Sayısı, 403-414.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
• Pesaran, M.H. and T. Yamagata, (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142: 50-93.
• Saçık, S. Y. (2009). Dış ticaret politikası ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: teorik açıdan bir inceleme. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11(16), 162-171.
• Sakyi, D. & Egyir, J. (2017) Effects of trade and FDI on economic growth in Africa: an empirical investigation. Transnational Corporations Review, 9:2, 66-87, DOI: 10.1080/19186444.2017.1326717
• Sarkar, P. (2008). Trade openness and growth: ıs there any link?, Journal of Economic Issues, 42:3, 763-785, DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2008.11507178.
• Seetanah, B. (2009). Is foreign direct ınvestment growth conducive? new evidences from Sub-Saharan African countries, 1980-2005. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 9(2), 185-201.
• Seyoum, M., Wu, R. & Lin, J. (2014). Foreign direct ınvestment and trade openness in Sub-Saharan economies: A panel data Granger causality analysis. South African Journal of Economics, 82(3), 402-421.
• Sikwila, M.N., Ruvimbo, N.G. & Mosikari, T.J. (2014). Trade openness and GDP growth nexus in South Africa. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: B Economics and Commerce, 14(7).
• Spilimbergo, A., Londono, J. L &. Szekely, M. (1999). Income distribution, factor endowments and trade openness. Journal of Development Economics, 59(1), 77-101.
• Swamy, V. and V. Narayanamurthy, (2018). What drives the capital flows into BRICS economies?, The World Economy, 41:519-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12606
• Şahin, L. (2016). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların istihdama etkisinin ampirik analizi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 103-118.
• Tekin, R.B. (2012). Economic growth, exports and foreign direct investment in Least Developed Countries: A panel Granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 29 (2012), 868–878.
• Terzi, H. & Akbulut Bekar, S. (2019). Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, turizm ve dışa açıklık arasındaki ilişki: 1974-2014 dönemi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 20(1), 15-30.
• Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregression with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250.
• Topallı, N., (2016). Doğrudan sermaye yatırımları, ticari dışa açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye ve BRICS ülkeleri örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 17 (1): 83-95
• Türedi, S. & Berber, M. (2010, Ocak-Temmuz). Finansal kalkınma, ticari açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye üzerine bir analiz. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (35), 301-316.
• Ulaşan, B. (2012). Openness to international trade and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Economics, (25), 1-57.
• Ulaşan, B. (2015) Trade openness and economic growth: panel evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 22(2), 163-167, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2014.931914.
• Vergil, H. & Ayaş, N. (2009). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların istihdam üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 24(275), 89-114.
• Vergil, H. & Karaca, C. (2010), Gelişmekte olan ülkelere yönelik uluslararası sermaye hareketlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: panel veri analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(4), 1207-1216.
• Wacziarg, R. &Welch, K.H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 2(2), 187-231.
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69 (6), 709-748.
• Wijeweera, A., Villano, R. & Dollery, B. (2010). Economic growth and fdı ınflows: a stochastic frontier analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 43(2), 143-158.
• Yamagata, T. (2006). Pesaran CADF-CIPS Testi için Gauss kodu. 13 Mart 2006.
• Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, (72), 57-89.
• Yapraklı, S. (2007). Ticari ve finansal dışa açıklık ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye üzerine bir uygulama. Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, (5).