Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması

Ali Erdi Karabalık; Büşra Tekin

Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması

Öz

En az iki kişi ile ifa edilen, diğer kişi/kişiler hakkında yapılan olumlu/olumsuz söylenti anlamına gelen dedikodunun örgüt ve örgüt yöneticileri için olumlu veya olumsuz yönlerinin olduğu ifade edilebilir. Örgütlerin modern veya post-modern bir yaklaşımla dedikoduyu ele almaları ve dedikoduyu değerlendirme usulleri birbirinden farklılık göstermektedir. Öte yandan örgütlerde dedikodu iyi yönetilmesi gereken ve yönetilemediği durumlarda olumsuz çıktılara yol açan önemli bir olgu olarak da karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Çalışma, dedikoduyu kavramsal açıdan ele alarak literatür taraması ile bir araştırma gündemi sunmaya odaklanmıştır. Bu kapsamda literatürün mevcut hali ve dikkate değer boşlukları ortaya çıkartılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel dedikodu, dedikodunun yarar ve zararları, informal iletişim.

Kaynakça

Atak, M. (2005). Örgütlerde Resmi Olmayan İletişimin Yeri ve Önemi. Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(2), 59-67.
Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L. ve Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as Cultural Learning. Review Of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121.
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (1994). The vindication of gossip. In Goodman, Ed: Robert F. Goodman ve Aaron Ben- Ze’ev. Good gossip, Kansas City: University Press of Kansas. 11-24.
Bennett, R. J. ve Robinson, S. L. (2003). The Past, Present, And Future Of Workplace Deviance Research. Ed: J. Greenberg. Organizational Behavior: The State Of Science. New Jersey: Erlbaum. 247-281.
Bordia, P., Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V.J. ve DiFonzo, N. (2006), Rumors And Stress During Organizational Change. Group and Organization Management, 31(5). 641-662.
Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., Leung, K., Bierbrauer, G., Gomez, C. ve Kirkman, B. L. (2001). Culture and Procedural Justice: The Influence of Power Distance on Reactions to Voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 300-315.
Callahan J. L., (2014) Writing Literature Reviews: A Reprise and Update, Human Resource Development Review 13(3):271-275.
Decoster, S., Camps, J. ve Stouten, J. (2013). Standing by Your Organization: The Impact of Organizational Identification and Abusive Supervision on Followers’ Perceived Cohesion and Tendency to Gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 623-634.
Dekker, I. ve Barling, J. (1998). Personal and Organizational Predictors of Workplace Sexual Harassment of Women by Men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(1), 7-18.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100-110.

Eckhaus, E. ve Ben-Hador, B. (2019). Gossip and gender differences: a content analysis approach. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 97–108.
Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ellwardt, L. (2011). Gossip in Organizations: A Social Network Study. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi, University of Groningen.
Eroğlu, E. (2005). Determining the Managers Attitudes Towards Gossip and Rumor (An Application in Arfor Transport Service). Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 203–218.
Esposito, J. and Rosnow, R. (1983). Corporate Rumors: How They Start And How To Stop Them. Management Review, 34(4), 9-44.
Fan, Z. ve Dawson, P. (2022). Gossip As Eluative Sensemaking And The Concealment Of Confidential Gossip İn The Everyday Life Of Organizations. Management Learning, 53(2), 146-166.
Farley, Sally D.F., Diane, R. T. ve Mason W. H. (2010). On Coffee Talk and Break-Room Chatter: Perceptions of Women Who Gossip in the Workplace. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(4). 361- 368.
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99.
Georganta, K., Panagopoulou, E. ve Montgomery, A. (2014). Talking Behind Their Backs: Negative Gossip and Burnout in Hospitals. Burnout Research, 1(2), 76-81.
Gholipour, A., Fakheri, S. ve Kozekanan, M. Z. (2011). Utilizing Gossip As A Strategy To Construct Organizational Reality. Business Strategy Series, 12(2), 56 – 62.
Grosser, T. J., Kidwell, V. L., Labianca, G. J. ve Ellwardt, L. (2012). Hearing İt Through The Grapevine: Positive And Negative Workplace Gossip. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 52-61.
Hafen, S. (1995), The Gossip Web Of Organizational Life. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. Ohio: Ohio State University.
Hafen, S. (2004). Organizational Gossip: A Revolving Door of Regulation and Resistance. Southern Journal of Communication, 69(3), 223-240.
Kang, H., Garciaruano, K. ve Lin, Y. (2008). Factors Affecting E-Mail Rumor Belief And Activity. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8, 160–169.
Kapferer, J.N. (1992). Dünyanın En Eski Medyası: Dedikodu ve Söylenti. Çev: Işın Gürbüz. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Karathanos, P. ve Auriemmo, A. (1999). Care And Feeding Of The Organizational Grapevine. Industrial Management, 41(2), 22-29.
Kartch, F. (2009). An Ethnographic Examination Of Gossip İn A Small Organization. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Northern Illinois University,
Kim, A., Moon, J. ve Shin, J. (2019). Justice Perceptions, Perceived Insider Status, and Gossip at Work: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 97, 30-42.
Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2010). Evolutionary Perspectives on Workplace Gossip: Why and How Gossip Can Serve Groups? Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 150–176.
Kniffin, K. M., ve Wilson, D. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams. Human Nature, 16, 278-292.
Kurland, P. and Pelled, L. (2000). Passing The Word: Toward A Model Of Gossip And Power İn The Workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 426-438.
Loughry, M. L. ve Tosi, H. L. (2008). Performance İmplications Of Peer Monitoring. Organization Science, 19, 876-890.
Knez, M., ve Simester, D. (2001). Firm-wide incentives and mutual monitoring at Continental Airlines. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 743-772.
McAndrew, F. T., Bell, E. K. ve Garcia, C. M. (2007), Who Do We Tell and Whom Do We Tell On? Gossip as a Strategy for Status Enhancement, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7).1562-1577.
McAuley, J., Duberley, J. Ve Johnson, P. (2007). Organization Tehory: Challenges and Perspectives, Londra: FT Prentice Hall.
Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Major, B. ve Seery, M. (2001). Challenge And Threat Responses During Downward And Upward Social Comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 477- 497.
Michelson, G. ve Mouly, V. S. (2004). Do Loose Lips Sink Ships? The Meaning, Antecedents, and Consequences of Rumour and Gossips in Organisations. An International Journal of Corporate Communications, 9(3), 189-201.
Michelson, G., & Mouly, S. (2000). Rumor and Gossip in Organizations: A Conceptual Study. Management Decision, 38(5), 339–346.
Michelson, G., Iterson, A. ve Waddington, K. (2010). Gossip in Organizations: Contexts, Consequences, and Controversies. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 371-390.
Nicoll, D. (1994). Acknowledge And Use Your Grapevine. Management Decision, 32(6), 25-30.
Paulhus, D. L. ve Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563
Porath, C.L., ve Pearson, C. M. (2010). The Cost of Bad Behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 2010, 39, 64-71.
Raskolnikov, A. (2007). The Cost Of Norms: Tax Effects Of Tacit Understandings. University of Chicago Law Review, 74, 601-685.
Rosnow, R. L. (2001). Rumor and Gossip in Interpersonal Interaction and Beyond: A Social Exchange Perspective. R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 203-232.
Roy, F. D. (1958). Banana Time: Job Satisfaction And Informal Interaction. Human Organization, 18. 158-168.
Rudnicki, K., Backer, C.D. ve Declerck, C.H. (2018). The Effects Of Gossip On İnterpersonal Trust Depend On Prosociality Of The Gossipers. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Evolution of Language.
Sargut, S. Ve Özen, Ş. (2010). Örgüt Kuramları. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
Schultz, M. (1992). Post-modern Pictures of Culture: A Post-modern Reflection on the Modern Notion of Corporate Culture. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 15-36.
Stewart, P. J. ve Strathern, A. (2004) Witchcraft, Sorcery, Rumors and Gossip. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, C. S. ve Ong, M. (2002). Goal Assignment And Performance: Assessing The Mediating Roles Of Goal Commitment And Self-Efficacy And The Moderating Role Of Power Distance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1140-1161.
Şişman, M. (1996). Post-modernizm Tartışmaları ve Örgüt Kuramındaki Yansımaları. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(3). 451-464.
Thomas, S. A. ve Rozell, E. J. (2007). Gossip and Nurses: Malady or Remedy? The Health Care Manager, 26(2), 111–115.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines And Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
Waddington, K. ve Fletcher, C. (2005). Gossip and emotion in nursing and health-care organizations. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 19(4–5), 378–394.
Wang, W., Mao, J., Wu, W. ve Liu, J. (2012). Abusive Supervision And Workplace Deviance: The Mediating Role Of İnteractional Justice And The Moderating Role Of Power Distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 43–60.
Yılmaz, G. (2009). Örgütlerde Dedikodu ve Söylenti. Ed: Keser, A., Yılmaz, G. ve Yürür, S. İş Yaşamında Davranış: Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları. 245-276.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Örgütsel Davranış

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ali Erdi Karabalık ^*
0000-0002-6211-2724
Türkiye

Büşra Tekin
0000-0002-6143-6954
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

28 Haziran 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Haziran 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Haziran 2024

Kabul Tarihi

11 Haziran 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK

APA

Karabalık, A. E., & Tekin, B. (2024). Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması. Boyabat İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergisi, 4(1), 76-100. https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK

AMA

1.Karabalık AE, Tekin B. Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması. SEİB Dergisi. 2024;4(1):76-100. https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK

Chicago

Karabalık, Ali Erdi, ve Büşra Tekin. 2024. “Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması”. Boyabat İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergisi 4 (1): 76-100. https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK.

EndNote

Karabalık AE, Tekin B (01 Haziran 2024) Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması. Boyabat İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergisi 4 1 76–100.

IEEE

[1]A. E. Karabalık ve B. Tekin, “Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması”, SEİB Dergisi, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 76–100, Haz. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK

ISNAD

Karabalık, Ali Erdi - Tekin, Büşra. “Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması”. Boyabat İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergisi 4/1 (01 Haziran 2024): 76-100. https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK.

JAMA

1.Karabalık AE, Tekin B. Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması. SEİB Dergisi. 2024;4:76–100.

MLA

Karabalık, Ali Erdi, ve Büşra Tekin. “Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması”. Boyabat İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergisi, c. 4, sy 1, Haziran 2024, ss. 76-100, https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK.

Vancouver

1.Ali Erdi Karabalık, Büşra Tekin. Örgütlerde Dedikodu: Bir Literatür Taraması. SEİB Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2024;4(1):76-100. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26CG72BK