Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde ova kurbağasının (Pelophylax ridibundus) üreme ekolojisi ve yumurta bırakma alanı seçimi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 64 - 73, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.1842565

Öz

Türkiye'nin Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi'ndeki Trabzon ilinde bulunan Darıca deresinde Ova kurbağasının (Pelophylax ridibundus) üreme ekolojisi ve yumurtlama yeri seçimi çalışılmıştır. Arazi çalışmaları, 2008 yılının Mart ayından Ağustos ayına kadar 3-4 günlük aralıklarla dere boyunca 420 m'lik bir bölümde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma; üreme faaliyetlerinin zamanlamasını, yumurta kümelerinin dağılımını, yapıştırıldığı substratı, büyüklüğünü, larvaların yumurtadan çıkma başarısını belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Arazide ilk yumurta kümesi Mart ayında erkeklerin ses çıkarmalarının ardından Nisan ayı başında başlamış, Mayıs ayında zirveye ulaşmış ve Temmuz ayı sonunda sona ermiştir. Çalışma esnasında toplam 968 yumurta kümesi belirlenip kayıt altın alınmış; bunların %91,1'i dere kenarında, %8,9'u ise yağmur suyuyla oluşan su birikintilerine bırakılmıştır. Yumurta kümeleri çoğunlukla sığ ve durgun dere kenarına, %81,5'i 10 cm’den daha küçük derinlikte, %57,2'si ise dere kenarından 20 cm mesafede belirlendi. Yumurta kümelerinin %94,4'lük bir kısmı çimen, taş, su bitkileri, yosun veya sudaki organik kalıntılara yapıştırılırken, sadece %5,6'sı su yüzeyinde serbestçe yüzerken belirlendi. Yumurta kümelerindeki yumurta sayısı 132 ila 1135 arasında değişmektedir ve laboratuvarda larvaların yumurtadan çıkma başarısı ortalama %84,4 olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışma alanında ne kurbağa ne de yumurta kümelerinin gözlemlenmediği denize yakın dere bölümüne kıyasla üreme alanlarında tuzluluk, iletkenlik ve toplam çözünmüş katı madde oranlarının önemli ölçüde daha düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, P. ridibundus'un akarsu ekosistemlerinde yumurtlama için su akışının minimum olduğu sığ ve düşük tuzluluk değerlerine sahip yerleri seçici olarak kullandığını göstermektedir. Çalışma, Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi'ndeki P. ridibundus'un üreme ekolojisi hakkında ilk kapsamlı verileri sağlayarak, bölgesel populasyonlara özgü özelliklerin daha geniş bir şekilde anlaşılmasına ve türün korunma çalışmalarına katkıda bulunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Kaynakça

  • AmphibiaWeb, (2022). Pelophylax ridibundus: Marsh Frog https://amphibiaweb.org/species/5137 University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. (Accessed on 14 November 2025).
  • Bayrakcı Y, Çiçek K (2023). Breeding ecology and larval development of Marsh Frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sl) from East Mediterranean, Türkiye. Commagene Journal of Biology 7(1): 65-72.
  • Beattie RC (1985). The date of spawning in populations of the common frog (Rana temporaria) from different altitudes in northern England. Journal of Zoology 205(1): 137-154.
  • Berven KA, Gill DE, Smith-Gill SJ. (1979). Countergradient selection in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Evolution 609-623.
  • Blaustein L (1999). Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population dynamics and community structure. In Evolutionary theory and processes: Modern perspectives: Papers in Honour of Eviatar Nevo 441-456.
  • Blaustein L, Kiflawi M, Eitam A, Mangel M, Cohen JE (2004). Oviposition habitat selection in response to risk of predation in temporary pools: mode of detection and consistency across experimental venue. Oecologia 138(2): 300-305.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990). Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5(7): 203-204.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB, Sousa WP (1994). Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions. Conservation Biology 8(1): 60-71.
  • Buskirk JV (2003). Habitat partitioning in European and North American pond breeding frogs and toads. Diversity and Distributions 9(5): 399-410.
  • Davis SK (2005). Nest-site selection patterns and the influence of vegetation on nest survival of mixed-grass prairie passerines. The Condor 107(3): 605-616.
  • Gardner T (2001). Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24(2): 25-44.
  • Haddad CF, Prado CP (2005). Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55(3): 207-217.
  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000). Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404(6779): 752-755.
  • IUCN (2023). Pelophylax ridibundus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. e.T58705A63864334. https://www.iucnredlist.org (Downloaded on 14 November 2025).
  • Johansson F, Richter-Boix A, Gomez-Mestre I (2016). Morphological consequences of developmental plasticity in Rana temporaria are not accommodated into among-population or among-species variation. Evolutionary Biology 43(2); 242-256.
  • Kern MM, Nassar AA, Guzy JC, Dorcas ME (2013). Oviposition site selection by spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in an isolated wetland. Journal of Herpetology 47(3): 445-449.
  • Lai SJ, Kam YC, Lin YS (2003). Elevational variation in reproductive and life history traits of Sauter's frog Rana sauteri Boulenger, 1909 in Taiwan. Zoological Studies 42(1): 193-202.
  • Moore JA (1939). Temperature tolerance and rates of development in the eggs of Amphibia. Ecology 20(4): 459-478.
  • Moreira FD, Marques R, Sousa M, Rebelo R (2017). Breeding in both lotic and lentic habitats explains the invasive potential of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) in Portugal. Aquatic Invasions 12(4): 565-574.
  • Niu Z, Xue H, Jiang Z, Chai L, Wang H (2023). Effects of temperature on metamorphosis and endochondral ossification in Rana chensinensis tadpoles. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 45: 101057.
  • Ortiz-Ross X, Thompson ME, Salicetti-Nelson E, Vargas-Ramírez O, Donnelly MA (2020). Oviposition site selection in three glass frog species. Copeia 108(2): 333-340.
  • Paton PW, Harris RN (2010). Egg mass and nest counts. In: Dodd CK (ed) Amphibian Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-165.
  • Parmesan, C (1996). Climate and species' range. Nature 383: 765-766.
  • Poo S, Cheng YC, Fuh NT, Chuang MF, Kam YC (2024). Sex specific oviposition site selection in an arboreal treefrog with a resource defense mating system. Ethology 130(5): e13444.
  • Pounds J, Fogden M, Campbell J (1999). Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611-615.
  • Raut M, Sharma A, Cyriac VP (2025). Habitat features influence oviposition site selection in the Indian goldenback frog Indosylvirana indica in the Western Ghats of India. Tropical Ecology 66: 292-302.
  • Resetarits Jr, WJ (1996). Oviposition site choice and life history evolution. American Zoologist 36(2): 205-215.
  • Resetarits WJ, Wilbur HM (1989). Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: Role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70(1): 220-228.
  • Rudolf, V.H.W., Rödel, MO (2005). Oviposition site selection in a complex and variable environment: The role of habitat quality and conspecific cues. Oecologia 142(2): 316-325.
  • Sánchez-Ochoa DJ, Pérez-Mendoza HA, Charruau P (2020). Oviposition site selection and conservation insights of two tree frogs (Agalychnis moreletii and A. callidryas). South American Journal of Herpetology 17(1): 17-28.
  • Seebacher F, Grigaltchik VS (2014). Embryonic developmental temperatures modulate thermal acclimation of performance curves in tadpoles of the frog Limnodynastes peronii. PLoS One 9(9): e106492.
  • Tarkhnishvili DN, Gokhelashvili RK (eds) (1999). The amphibians of the Caucasus (Advances in Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union 4). Sofia: Pensoft Publications, p.239.
  • Todd BD, Scott DE, Pechmann JH, Gibbons JW (2011). Climate change correlates with rapid delays and advancements in reproductive timing in an amphibian community. Proc Biol Sci 278(1715): 2191-2197.
  • Wake DB (1991). Declining Amphibian Populations. Science 253: 860.
  • Wells KD (ed) (2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago press, p.1148.
  • Weygoldt P, Carvalho e Silva SP (1991). Observations on mating, oviposition, egg sac formation and development in the egg-brooding frog, Fritziana goeldii. Amphibia-Reptilia 12(1): 67-80.

Reproductive ecology and oviposition site selection of marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) in Eastern Black Sea Region, Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 64 - 73, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.1842565

Öz

This study investigates the reproductive ecology and oviposition site selection of Marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) in Darıca Stream, located in Trabzon Province, Eastern Black Sea Region, Türkiye. Field observations were conducted at 3-4 day intervals from March to August 2008 along a 420 m section of the stream. The present study was conducted to determine the timing of reproductive activity, the spatial distribution and substrate attachment of egg clutches, clutch size, and larval hatching success. Male calling activity began in March, while oviposition started in early April, reached a peak in May, and ended in late July. A total of 968 egg clutches were documented, with 91.1% deposited along the stream banks and 8.9% in rainwater-formed puddles. Most clutches (81.5%) were found at water depths of less than 10 cm, and 57.2% were located within 20 cm of the stream bank, mainly in shallow, stagnant microhabitats. The majority of egg clutches (94.4%) were attached to substrates such as grasses, stones, aquatic vegetation, moss, or organic debris, while only 5.6% were floating freely on the water surface. Egg clutch sizes ranged from 132 to 1135 eggs, and the mean hatching success under laboratory conditions was 84.4%. In contrast, no adult frogs or egg clutches were observed in a downstream river section close to the sea, where salinity, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids were significantly higher. These findings indicate that P. ridibundus preferentially selects shallow freshwater habitats with low salinity and minimal water flow for reproduction. This study provides the first comprehensive account of the reproductive ecology of P. ridibundus in the Eastern Black Sea Region and offers essential baseline data for understanding local population dynamics and supporting regional conservation efforts.

Kaynakça

  • AmphibiaWeb, (2022). Pelophylax ridibundus: Marsh Frog https://amphibiaweb.org/species/5137 University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. (Accessed on 14 November 2025).
  • Bayrakcı Y, Çiçek K (2023). Breeding ecology and larval development of Marsh Frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sl) from East Mediterranean, Türkiye. Commagene Journal of Biology 7(1): 65-72.
  • Beattie RC (1985). The date of spawning in populations of the common frog (Rana temporaria) from different altitudes in northern England. Journal of Zoology 205(1): 137-154.
  • Berven KA, Gill DE, Smith-Gill SJ. (1979). Countergradient selection in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Evolution 609-623.
  • Blaustein L (1999). Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population dynamics and community structure. In Evolutionary theory and processes: Modern perspectives: Papers in Honour of Eviatar Nevo 441-456.
  • Blaustein L, Kiflawi M, Eitam A, Mangel M, Cohen JE (2004). Oviposition habitat selection in response to risk of predation in temporary pools: mode of detection and consistency across experimental venue. Oecologia 138(2): 300-305.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990). Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5(7): 203-204.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB, Sousa WP (1994). Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global Extinctions. Conservation Biology 8(1): 60-71.
  • Buskirk JV (2003). Habitat partitioning in European and North American pond breeding frogs and toads. Diversity and Distributions 9(5): 399-410.
  • Davis SK (2005). Nest-site selection patterns and the influence of vegetation on nest survival of mixed-grass prairie passerines. The Condor 107(3): 605-616.
  • Gardner T (2001). Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24(2): 25-44.
  • Haddad CF, Prado CP (2005). Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55(3): 207-217.
  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000). Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404(6779): 752-755.
  • IUCN (2023). Pelophylax ridibundus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. e.T58705A63864334. https://www.iucnredlist.org (Downloaded on 14 November 2025).
  • Johansson F, Richter-Boix A, Gomez-Mestre I (2016). Morphological consequences of developmental plasticity in Rana temporaria are not accommodated into among-population or among-species variation. Evolutionary Biology 43(2); 242-256.
  • Kern MM, Nassar AA, Guzy JC, Dorcas ME (2013). Oviposition site selection by spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in an isolated wetland. Journal of Herpetology 47(3): 445-449.
  • Lai SJ, Kam YC, Lin YS (2003). Elevational variation in reproductive and life history traits of Sauter's frog Rana sauteri Boulenger, 1909 in Taiwan. Zoological Studies 42(1): 193-202.
  • Moore JA (1939). Temperature tolerance and rates of development in the eggs of Amphibia. Ecology 20(4): 459-478.
  • Moreira FD, Marques R, Sousa M, Rebelo R (2017). Breeding in both lotic and lentic habitats explains the invasive potential of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) in Portugal. Aquatic Invasions 12(4): 565-574.
  • Niu Z, Xue H, Jiang Z, Chai L, Wang H (2023). Effects of temperature on metamorphosis and endochondral ossification in Rana chensinensis tadpoles. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 45: 101057.
  • Ortiz-Ross X, Thompson ME, Salicetti-Nelson E, Vargas-Ramírez O, Donnelly MA (2020). Oviposition site selection in three glass frog species. Copeia 108(2): 333-340.
  • Paton PW, Harris RN (2010). Egg mass and nest counts. In: Dodd CK (ed) Amphibian Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-165.
  • Parmesan, C (1996). Climate and species' range. Nature 383: 765-766.
  • Poo S, Cheng YC, Fuh NT, Chuang MF, Kam YC (2024). Sex specific oviposition site selection in an arboreal treefrog with a resource defense mating system. Ethology 130(5): e13444.
  • Pounds J, Fogden M, Campbell J (1999). Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611-615.
  • Raut M, Sharma A, Cyriac VP (2025). Habitat features influence oviposition site selection in the Indian goldenback frog Indosylvirana indica in the Western Ghats of India. Tropical Ecology 66: 292-302.
  • Resetarits Jr, WJ (1996). Oviposition site choice and life history evolution. American Zoologist 36(2): 205-215.
  • Resetarits WJ, Wilbur HM (1989). Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: Role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70(1): 220-228.
  • Rudolf, V.H.W., Rödel, MO (2005). Oviposition site selection in a complex and variable environment: The role of habitat quality and conspecific cues. Oecologia 142(2): 316-325.
  • Sánchez-Ochoa DJ, Pérez-Mendoza HA, Charruau P (2020). Oviposition site selection and conservation insights of two tree frogs (Agalychnis moreletii and A. callidryas). South American Journal of Herpetology 17(1): 17-28.
  • Seebacher F, Grigaltchik VS (2014). Embryonic developmental temperatures modulate thermal acclimation of performance curves in tadpoles of the frog Limnodynastes peronii. PLoS One 9(9): e106492.
  • Tarkhnishvili DN, Gokhelashvili RK (eds) (1999). The amphibians of the Caucasus (Advances in Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union 4). Sofia: Pensoft Publications, p.239.
  • Todd BD, Scott DE, Pechmann JH, Gibbons JW (2011). Climate change correlates with rapid delays and advancements in reproductive timing in an amphibian community. Proc Biol Sci 278(1715): 2191-2197.
  • Wake DB (1991). Declining Amphibian Populations. Science 253: 860.
  • Wells KD (ed) (2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago press, p.1148.
  • Weygoldt P, Carvalho e Silva SP (1991). Observations on mating, oviposition, egg sac formation and development in the egg-brooding frog, Fritziana goeldii. Amphibia-Reptilia 12(1): 67-80.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Omurgalı Biyolojisi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Emel Çakır 0000-0002-8462-6697

Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Aralık 2025
Kabul Tarihi 21 Aralık 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çakır, E. (2025). Reproductive ecology and oviposition site selection of marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) in Eastern Black Sea Region, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Biodiversity, 8(2), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.1842565

Creative Commons Lisansı
Türk Biyoçeşitlilik Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.