Investigations on host and host egg preference of Trichogramma brassicae, T. cacoeciae and T. evanescens

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the preference of host and host eggs of Trichogrammma brassicae Bezdenko, T. cacoeciae Marchal and T. evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) at laboratory conditions (25±1 0C temperature, 65-70% relative humidity, 16/8 hour light/dark period) on Ephestia kuehniella Zeller and Cadra cautella Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Eggs of different ages were evaluated. All of the three parasitoids species preferred to 1 day old eggs than the 2 or 3 days old eggs of E. kuehniella and C. cautella. Significantly higher parasitized eggs were determined as 1 day old eggs of E. kuehniella. Wasps reared from each source were tested on the source host and target host. Under the conditions E. kuehniella was a good host. We found that being reared on alternate host (C. cautella) decreased the parasitized eggs on the target E. kuehniella.

Keywords

• Trichogramma brassicae,Trichogramma cacoecia,Trichogramma evanescens,host age,host preference

Trichogramma brassicae, Trichogramma cacoecia ve Trichogramma evanescens’ in konukçu ve yumurta yaşı tercihi üzerinde araştırmalar

Öz

Bu çalışmada Trichogrammma brassicae Bezdenko, T. cacoeciae Marchal ve T. evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)’in (25±1 oC sıcaklık, %65-70 oransal nem, 16/8 saat aydınlık/karanlık periyot) laboratuvarda Ephestia kuehniella Zeller ile Cadra cautella Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) konukçu ve yumurta yaşı tercihleri araştırılmıştır. Değişik yaşta yumurta verilmiştir. Her üç parazitoit türü de 1 günlük E. kuehniella ile C. cautella yumurtalarını 2 ve 3 günlük yumurtalardan daha çok tercih etmiştir. Trichogrammma brassicae, T. cacoeciae ve T. evanescens konukçusu E. kuehniella ile hedef konukçusu C. cautella üzerinde yetiştirilmiştir. Alternatif konukçu (C. cautella) üzerinde yetiştirilen parazitoitlerin hedef konukçu E. kuehniella yumurtasında parazitledikleri yumurta sayılarında bir düşme bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Trichogramma brassicae,konukçu yaşı,Trichogramma cacoecia,Trichogramma evanescens,konukçu tercihi

Kaynakça

1. Aydin Özder N., & Kiliçer, N. 1996. The effect of Agrotis segetum (Denis and Schiff) ( Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs age and pattern, food and temperature on longevity, fecundity, progeny and parasitism rate of Trichogramma embryophagum (Hartig) ve T. turkeiensis Kostadinov (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 20 (1),35– 49.
2. Ayvaz A., Karasu E., . Karabörklü S.& Tunçbilek A.Ş. 2008. Effect of cold storage, rearing temperature, parasitoid age and irradiation on the performance of Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammmatidae). Journal of Stored Products Research44(3):232-240.
3. Bari MN, Jahan M., Islam K.S. & Ali M.P. 2016. Host eggs age and supplementary diet influence the parasitism activity of Trichogramma zahiri (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 109(3) 1102-1108.
4. Beevers M., Lewis W.J.,. Gross H.R. & Nordlund D.A. 1981. Kairomones and their us efor management of entomophagus insect: X. Laboratory studies on manipulation of host-finding behavior of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley with a kairomone extracted from Heliothis zea (Boddie) moth scales. J. Chem.Ecol. 7:635-648.
5. Farazmand A., Iranipour S., Saber M., Mashhadi Jaforloo M. 2007. Comparison of some biological parameters of Trichogramma barssicae Bez. On Anagasta kuehniella Zell. and Plodia interpunctella Hub. İn laboratory conditon. Agricultural Science, 17: 175-185.
6. Fuchsberg J. F.,T.Z. Yong, J.E. Losey, M.E. Carter, & M.P. Hoffmann M.P.2007. Evaluation of corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis; Homoptera: Aphididae) honeydew as a food source fort he egg parasitoid Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biological Contorl 40(2), 230-236.
7. Gazit Y., Lewis W.J. & Tumlinson J.H. 1996. Arrestment of Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) by a kairomone associated with egg of its host, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. Control 6: 283-290.
8. Greenberg S. M., Nordlund A. D., Zhixin W. 1998. Influence of Rearing Host on Adult Size and Ovipositional Behavior of Mass Produced Female Trichogramma minutum Riley and Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biological Control, 11, 43–48.

9. Hassan S.A. & Guo M.F. 1991. Selection of effective strains of egg parasites of the genus Trichogramma (Hym., Trichogrammatidae) to control the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis Hb. (Lep., Pyralidae) Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie, 111: 335-341.
10. Hilker M. & Meiners T. 2002. Chemoecology of insect eggs and eggs deposition., Blackwell, Berlin, 390 s.
11. Hintz J.L. & Andow D.A. 1990. Host age and host selection by Trichogramma nubilale. Entomophaga 35 (10) 141-150.
12. Hoffmann M.P., Ode P.R., Walker D. L., Gardner J., Nouhuys S. van, Shelton A.M. 2001. Performance of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Reared on Factitious Hosts, Including the Target Host, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Biological Control 21, 1–10.
13. Honda J.Y. & Luck R. F. 2000. Age and suitability of Amorbia cuneana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Sabulodes aegrotata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) eggs for Trichogramma platneri (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).
14. Iranipour S., Farazmand A, Saber M., Mashhadi Jafarloo M. 2009. Demography and Life History of the Egg Parasitoid, Trichogramma brassicae, on Two Moths Anagasta kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella in the Laboratory. J Insect Sci. 9: 51-58.
15. Iranipour S., Vaez N., Ghanbalani G.N., Zakaria R.A., Jafarloo M.M. 2010. Effect of host change on demographic fitness of the parasitoid, Trichogramma brassicae. Journal of İnsect Science, 10:(78) 1-10. Kishani F.H., Ashouri A. A., P.A. Zibaee, Alford L. 2016. The Effect of Host Nutritional Quality on Multiple Components of Trichogramma brassicae Fitness. Bull Entomol Res 106 (5), 633-641. Li, Li-ying. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control of different crops: A survey. In: Wajnberg, E. & S. A. Hassan (eds.) Biological control with egg parasitoids. CAB International, Wallingford, 37-54 pp. Özder N. 2004.“Effect of Different Cold Storage Periods on Parasitization Performanceof Trichogramma cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on Eggs of Ephestiakuehniella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae)”, Biocontrol Science and Technology 14(5): 441-447,2004.
16. Özder N. 2006. Comparative biology and life tables of Trichogramma brassicae and Trichogramma cacoeciae with Ephestia kuehniella as host at three constant temperatures, The Great Lakes Entomolgist 39(1&2), 62-66,
17. Özder N. & Kara G. 2010. Comparative biology and life tables of Trichogramma cacoeciae, T. brassicae and T. evanescens (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) with Ephestia kuehniella and Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) as hosts at three constant temperatures”, Biocontrol Science and Technology 20(3), 245-255,
18. Özpinar A. 1994.Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hym., Trichogrammatidae)’in iki farklı konukçudaki yaşam çizelgesi. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, 18(2): 83-88. Öztemiz S. 2010. Depolanmış ürünlerde zararlı Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)’nin biyolojik mücadelesinde yumurta parazitoidi Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)’in etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(1). 57-62.-
19. Smith S. M. 1996. Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annual Review of Entomology, 41: 375-406. Tunçbilek A.S. & Ayvaz A. 2003. Influences of host age sex ratio, population density and photoperiod on parasitism by Trichogramma evanescens Westw. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Pest Sciences. 76: 178-180.
20. Vaez N., Nouri Gabalan, G., Iranipour S., Mashhadi Jafarloo M.& Asghari Zakaria R 2009. .Necessity of encountering Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko wasp reared on alternative host, cereal moth and meal moth to target pest bollworm Helicoverpa armigera Hubner prior to release. Agricultural Science, 19: 317-332.