Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi Binasının Yer Radarı (GPR) Yöntemi ile Hasarsız İncelenmesi

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 0 - 0, 29.06.2016

Sinan Kosaroglu , Funda Bilim , Erkan Tastan

https://doi.org/10.17798/beufen.90389

Cited By: 2

https://izlik.org/JA82XL29SA

Abstract

Yüksek frekanslı Yer radarı (GPR) yöntemi binaların hasarsız incelenmesinde çok kullanışlı olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. GPR hızlı, sessiz ve binada bir bozulmaya sebep olmadığı için özellikle tarihsel binaların incelenmesi için kullanışlı bir yöntemdir. Bu makale, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi B Binasının ana taşıyıcı unsurlarından bazı perde duvarların Yer Radarı (GPR) yöntemi ile incelenmesini sunmaktadır. GPR ölçümünde 1600 MHz anten kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, seçilen perde duvarlardaki yatay ve düşey donatıların kalınlıkları, konumları ve aşınma zonları belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca makale yüksek frekanslı GPR yönteminin binaların hasarsız incelenmesinde etkisini vurgulamaktadır

References

• Balanis C.A. 1997. Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd Editon. Newyork, Wiley; 959 pp.
• Cott P.J. 2002. Archaeological geophysics in east Anglia, UK, Archaeological Prospection, 9: 157-161.
• Rizzo E., Chianese D., Lapenna V. 2005. Magnetic, GPR and geoelectrical measurements for studying the archaeological site of Masseria Nigro (Viggiano, southern Italy), Near Surface Geophysics, 3 (1): 13-19.
• Yalçiner C.Ç., Bano, M., Kadıoglu, M., Karabacak, V., Meghraoui, M., Altunel E. 2009. New temple discovery at the archaeological site of Nysa (western Turkey) using GPR method, Journal of Archaeological Science, 36 : 1680-1689.
• Trinks I., Neubauer W., Hinterleitner A. 2014. First High-resolution GPR and magnetic archaeological prospection at the Viking Age settlement of Birka in Sweden, Archaeological Prospection, 21 : 185-199.
• Verdonck L., Taelman D., Vermeulen F., Docter R. 2015. The impact of spatial sampling and migration on the interpretation of complex archaeological ground-penetrating radar data, Archaeological Prospection, 22 : 91-103.
• Goodman D. 1994. Ground penetrating radar simularion in engineering and archaeology, Geophysics, 59 (2): 224-232.
• Saarenketo T., Scullion T. 2000. Road evaluation with ground
• penetrating radar, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 43: 119-138.
• Lubowiecka I., Armesto J., Arias P., Lorenzo H. 2009. Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics, Enginnering Structures, 31: 2667-2676.
• Solla M., Caamano J.C., Riveiro B., Arias P. 2012. A novel methodology fort he structural assessment of Stone arches based on geometric data by integration of photogrammetry and ground-penetrating radar, Engineering Structures, 35():296-306.
• Orlando L. 2002. Ground penetrating radar in massive rock: A case history, European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 7 : 265-279.
• Green A., Gross R., Holliger K., Horstmeyer H., Baldwin J. 2003. Results of 3-D georadar surveying and trenching the San Andreas fault near its northern landward limit, Tectonophysics, 368 : 7-23.
• Slater L., Niemi T.M. 2003. Ground penetrating radar investigation of active faults along the Dead Sea transform and implications for seismic hazards within the city of Aqaba, Jordan, Tectonophysics, 368: 33-50.
• Neal A. 2004. Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress, Earth Science Reviews, 66 : 261-330.
• Beres M., Haneni F.P. 1991. Application of ground penetrating radar methods in hydrogeologic studies, Ground Water, 29 : 375-386.
• Brewster M.L., Annan A.P. 1994. Ground penetrating radar monitoring of a controlled DNAPL release: 200 MHz radar, Geophysics, 59 (8): 1211-1221.
• Gertisser R., Cassidy N.J., Sylvain J.C., Nuzzo L., Preece K. 2012. Overbank block-and-ash flow deposits and the impact of valley-derived, unconfined flows on populated areas at Merapi volcanao, Java, Indosenia, Naturel Hazards, 60 : 623-648.
• Nuzzo L., Leucci G., Negri S. 2009. GPR, ERT and magnetic investigations inside the Marttyrium of St Philip, Hierapolis, Turkey, Archaeological Prospection, 16 : 177-192.
• Nuzzo L., Quarto T. 2010. Near-surface geophysical investigations inside the cloister of the historical palace ‘Palazzo dei Celestini’ i nLecce, Italy, Journal of Geophysical Engineering, 7 : 200-210.
• Böniger U. Tronicke J. 2010. Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target-specific attributes: application to tomp detection. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37 : 360-367.
• Szymczyk P., Szymczyk M. 2015. Non-destructive building investigation through analysis of GPR signal by S-transform. Automation in Construction, 55 : 35-46.
• Zhdanov M.S., Keller G.V. 1994. The geoelectrical methods in geophysical exploration. Elsevier, Netherlands (ISBN 0-444-89678-3), 873 pp.
• Sharma P.V., 1997. Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Cambridge University Press. Pp 320-28.
• Campbell M.J., Ulrichs J. 1969. Electrical properties of rocks and thier significance for lunar radar observations, Journal of Geophysical Research 74: 5867-5881.
• Daniels D.J. 2004. Ground Penetrating Radar-2nd Edition. London 984 pp.
• Rial F.I., Pereira, M., Lorenzo, H., Arias P., Novo A. 2007. Vertical and horizontal resolution of GPR bow-tie antennas. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Ground Penetrating Radar, Naples, Italy, pp 187-191.
• Kadıoğlu Y.K., Kadıoğlu S. 2004. Determination of fracture and cavities and mapping of depth slices in a marble area by ground penetrating radar method. The 16th International Geophysical Congress and Exhibition of Turkey. December 7-10. pp 359-362.
• Sandmeier, K. J., 2003. Reflexw 4.2 Manuel Book. Sandmeier Software, Zipser Strabe 1, D‐76227 Karlsruhe, Germany. Kar Yükü Haritasının Oluşturulması ve Çatı Kar Yüklerinin Belirlenmesi. KTÜ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İnşaat Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisan Tezi, 149s, Trabzon.