BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER GÜVENLİK KONSEYİNİN ULUSLARARASI HUKUKU UYGULAMADAKİ BAŞARISIZLIĞININ MÜSLÜMAN DÜNYASINDA ŞİDDET VE KAOSA KATKISI: YEMEN'E (2015- ) VE GAZZE'YE (2023- ) YÖNELİK SALDIRI SAVAŞLARI

Öz

Bu makale, öncelikle, içinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda hegemonik Batı güçleri tarafından uluslararası hukukun çarpık kullanımlarını ve Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyinin güç kullanımına dair suiistimal niteliğindeki yönlendirmelerini genel anlamda eleştirmektedir. Ardından, Müslüman dünyasındaki mevcut sorunları körükleyen iki olay ele alınmaktadır: Yemen (2015- ) ve Gazze'deki (2023- ) savaşlar. Makale, Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin bu iki krizdeki tutumunun ardındaki ikiyüzlülüğün ve çifte standardın mevcut uluslararası düzenin güvenilirliğini azalttığını savunmaktadır. Bu makale, başta ABD olmak üzere, hegemonik uluslararası aktörler tarafından kullanılan stratejileri ve hala büyük ölçüde Batı'nın kontrolünde olan uluslararası ana akım medyanın, Yemen ve Gazze'deki saldırı savaşlarının faillerini aklamak üzere ne şekilde kullanıldığını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Burada, aynı zamanda, görünüşte Husileri iktidardan uzaklaştırmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilen, Suudi Arabistan liderliğindeki çok uluslu askeri müdahaleye bir yasal çerçeve kazandırmak amacıyla, Yemen krizine ilişkin olarak alınmış olan Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi kararlarına ve önde gelen Batılı güçler ile medyanın ürettiği söylemsel çarpıtmalara yer verilmiştir. Makale, İsrail'in Ekim 2023'te Gazze'ye yönelik hayata geçirdiği ve halen vahşetini yitirmemiş olan soykırım niteliğindeki saldırısını incelemekte ve Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin bu korkunç trajediye karşı sergilemiş olduğu performansı sorgulamaktadır. Yemen örneğinde olduğu gibi, burada da, mevcut uluslararası düzenin hâkim güçleri ve onların medya organları tarafından Filistinlilerin mağduriyetini inkâr etmek ve Gazze'deki Siyonist suçları örtbas etmek amacıyla üretilen çarpık anlatılar ele alınmaktadır. Makale, hâlâ büyük ölçüde Batı güçlerinin etkisi altında olan mevcut uluslararası düzenin yasal ve kurumsal temellerinin "adaletin şaşması" sonucunu doğuran ve Müslüman dünyasının daha da marjinalleşmesine yol açan vahim durumuna ilişkin bazı değerlendirmelerle sona ermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hegemonik uluslararası düzen
• Yemen ve Gazze'ye karşı saldırı savaşları
• Gazze soykırımı
• BM Güvenlik Konseyi kararları

HOW THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL’S FAILURE TO UPHOLD INTERNATIONAL LAW HAS CONTRIBUTED TO VIOLENCE AND CHAOS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD: THE WARS OF AGGRESSION AGAINST YEMEN (2015- ) AND GAZA (2023- )

Öz

This paper draws on the perverse use of international law by hegemonic powers on the subject of the use of force in international relations. In order to expose the distortive interpretation and implementation, by major powers, of the UN Charter and other instruments and sources of international law, this study draws on two cases of the wars of aggression targeting Yemen and Gaza respectively. The failure of the UN Security Council to take punitive action against the Saudi-led coalition forces and Israel, as the two perpetrators of crimes of aggression against the victimises peoples, in order to end hostilities, has been a tragic testimony to the endurance of the colonial and asymmetrical roots of existing rules and principles of international law. The two cases and the dominant narrative surrounding them which has tended towards blaming the victims also point to the complicity between the centres of political power and the predominant media.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hegemonic international order
• wars of aggression against Yemen and Gaza
• genocide in Gaza
• UN Security Council resolutions

Kaynakça

1. Amnesty International, ‘Yemen War: No End in Sight’ (24 March 2020) accessed 7 January 2025
2. Altun T, West continues to support Israel despite rising deaths in Gaza genocide’ (Anadolu Agency, 5 October 2024) accessed 7 January 2025.
3. Anghie A, Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2004). Aral B, ‘Israel’s Fateful March: From Settler Colonialism to Genocidal State’, (Fall 2023) 25 Insight Turkey 181.
4. Baroud R, ‘The uneven alliance: How America became pro-Israel’ (Aljazeera, 9 March 2017), < https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/3/9/the-uneven-alliance-how-america-became-pro-israel> accessed 7 January 2025.
5. Cafiero G, ‘War on Gaza: In Munich, the Global South once again saw blatant hypocrisy of western leaders’ (Middle East Eye, 24 February 2024) accessed 27 November 2024.
6. Collins DE, ‘Western narcissism and support for genocidal Israel go hand in hand’ (Aljazeera, 11 January 2024) accessed 7 January 2025.
7. Darwich M, ‘Escalation in Failed Military Interventions: Saudi and Emirati Quagmires in Yemen’ (2020) 11 Global Policy 103.
8. Falk R, Predatory Globalization: A Critique (Polity Press, 1999). German L, ‘The hypocrisy of the West is exposed’ (Counterfire, 23 November 2023) accessed 27 November 2024.

9. Harris D, Cases and Materials on International Law (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 1983).
10. Hurd I, ‘The UN Security Council and the International Rule of Law’ (2014) The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2.
11. Ibsais A, ‘Palestinians are being dehumanised to justify occupation and genocide’ (Aljazeera, 20 August 2024) accessed 7 January 2025.
12. Jones O, ‘What atrocity would Israel have to commit for our leaders to break their silence?’ (The Guardian, 3 October 2024) accessed 7 January 2025.
13. Kayyali A W, A. W. Kayyali, Zionism, Imperialism, And Racism (Croom Helm 1979)
14. Kilani A, ‘Ending Western hypocrisy is the key to ending the war in Yemen’ TRTWORLD (2019) accessed 27 November 2024.
15. Knights M, ‘The Houthi War Machine: From Guerrilla War to State Capture’ (2018) 11(8) CTCSentinel accessed 7 January 2025. Koskenniemi M, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press 2002).
16. Lumer H, ‘Zionism in the service of imperialism’ (People’s World, 7 November 2023) accessed 7 January 2025.
17. Mauze G, ‘Israeli Networks of Influence in Brussels: Behind the Scenes’ (OrientXXI, 31 January 2019) Accessed 7 January 2025.
18. Mearsheimer JJ and Walt SM, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy (Penguin Book, 2007).
19. Moses J, ‘Gaza and the Political and Moral Failure of the Responsibility to Protect’ (2024) 18 Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 211.
20. Nguyen, Chealsea Ngoc Minh, ‘Gaza vs Ukraine: A double standard that has broken the world order’ (OpenDemocracy, 10 June 2024) accessed 27 November 2024
21. Preve A, ‘The US is complicit in Saudi atrocities in Yemen’ Al Jazeera English (19 March 2020) accessed 13 August 2024.
22. ‘Q & A on The Conflict in Yemen and International Law’ Human Rights Watch (6 April 2015) accessed 13 August 2024.
23. Reuters, ‘U.S. says Yemen's Houthis bear "major responsibility" in conflict’ (14 June 2021) accessed 7 January 2025.
24. Robinson K, ‘Yemen’s Tragedy: War, Stalemate and Suffering’ 2023 Foreign Affairs accessed 12 August 2024.
25. Ruys T and Ferro L, ‘Weathering the Storm: Legality and Legal Implications of the Saudi-Led Military Intervention in Yemen’ (2016) 65 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 61.
26. Stephens B , ‘Hamas Bears the Blame for Every Death in This War’ (The New York Times, 15 October 2023) accessed 7 January 2025
27. Tzimas T, ‘Legal Evaluation of the Saudi-Led Intervention in Yemen: Consensual Intervention in Cases of Contested Authority and Fragmented States’ (2018) 78 The Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV).
28. von Einsiedel S, Malone DM, Ugarte BS, ‘Introduction’ Sebastian von Einsiedel, David M. Malone and Bruno Stagno Ugarte (eds.), The UN Security Council in the Twenty-First Century (Lynne Rienner Publishers 2016). UNICEF, ‘Yemen Humanitarian Situation Report No. 1’ (19 May 2024) < https://reliefweb.int/report/yemen/unicef-yemen-humanitarian-situation-report-no-1-january-march-2024-enar#:~:text=SITUATION%20OVERVIEW%20AND%20HUMANITARIAN%20NEEDS,estimated%20to%20be%20internally%20displaced.> accessed 13 August 2024.
29. United Nations, ‘Charter of the United Nations’ (26 June 1945) UNTS XVI.
30. United Nations General Assembly, UNGA Res 2131 (XX), ‘Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States and the Protection of Their Independence and Sovereignty’ (21 December 1965) UN Doc. A/RES/2131(XX).
31. United Nations General Assembly, UNGA Res 2625(XXV), ‘Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the UN’ (24 October 1970) UN Doc. A/RES/2625(XXV).
32. United Nations General Assembly, UNGA Res 3314(XXIX), ‘Definition of Aggression’ (December 14, 1974) UN Doc. A/RES/3314(XXIX)
33. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 1766 (23 July 2007) UN Doc. S/RES/1766.
34. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2140 (26 February 2014) UN Doc. S/RES/2140.
35. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2216 (14 April 2015) UN Doc. S/RES/2216.
36. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 242 (22 November 1967) UN Doc. S/RES/242.
37. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2451 (21 December 2018) UN Doc. S/RES/2451.
38. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2452 (16 January 2019) UN Doc. S/RES/2452.
39. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2456 (26 February 2019) UN Doc. S/RES/2456.
40. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2624 (28 February 2022) UN Doc. S/RES/2624.
41. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2712 (15 November 2023) UN Doc. S/RES/2712.
42. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2720 (22 December 2023) UN Doc. S/RES/2720.
43. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2728 (25 March 2024) UN Doc. S/RES/2728.
44. United Nations Security Council, UNSC Res. 2735 (10 June 2024) UN Doc. S/RES/2735.