Araştırma Makalesi

CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM

Öz

Narratives of terrorism are often used and misused for political goals. This has never been as blatantly apparent as in the UK and the West in general after the 7 October raid where even genocide is being legitimised as self-defence against terrorism. The hypocrisy of presenting resistance fighters as terrorists while entirely disregarding the state terrorism of the oppressor is nothing new. This article looks back at British narratives surrounding apartheid South Africa and the liberation movement fighting against it to draw parallels with the current hypocritical branding of Palestinian resistance fighters as terrorists while ignoring blatant state terrorism perpetrated by the occupier. The paper further analyses the use and abuse of the UK Terrorism Act in the current context, which reveals a severe assault on freedom of expression with the apparent goal of not merely manufacturing consent for the genocide but also forcefully concealing the lack of such consent and the outright rejection of the terrorism narrative in a large part of the general public. Finally, the paper briefly outlines how the UK terrorism narrative has infiltrated the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the language chosen by its British Prosecutor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Bayev and Others v Russia App nos. 67667/09 and 2 others (ECtHR, 20 June 2017)
  2. Castells v Spain App no 11798/85 (ECtHR, 23 April 1992)
  3. Dink v Turkey App no 2668/07 and others (ECHR, 14 September 2010)
  4. Gaši and Others v Serbia App no 24738/19 (ECHR, 6 September 2022)
  5. Goodwin v United Kingdom App no 17488/90 (ECHR, 27 March 1996)
  6. Haji and Others v Azerbaijan App no 3503/10 and others (ECtHR, 1 October 2020)
  7. Handyside v the United Kingdom App no 5493/72 (ECtHR, 7 December 1976)
  8. Huseynova v Azerbaijan App no 10653/10 (ECHR, 13 April 2017)

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ceza Hukuku, Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Polona Florijancic *
United Kingdom

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Ocak 2025

Kabul Tarihi

27 Haziran 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Florijancic, P. (2025). CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM. The Boğaziçi Law Review, 3(1), 28-63. https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1627717
AMA
1.Florijancic P. CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM. BLR. 2025;3(1):28-63. doi:10.69800/blr.1627717
Chicago
Florijancic, Polona. 2025. “CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM”. The Boğaziçi Law Review 3 (1): 28-63. https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1627717.
EndNote
Florijancic P (01 Haziran 2025) CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM. The Boğaziçi Law Review 3 1 28–63.
IEEE
[1]P. Florijancic, “CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM”, BLR, c. 3, sy 1, ss. 28–63, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.69800/blr.1627717.
ISNAD
Florijancic, Polona. “CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM”. The Boğaziçi Law Review 3/1 (01 Haziran 2025): 28-63. https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1627717.
JAMA
1.Florijancic P. CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM. BLR. 2025;3:28–63.
MLA
Florijancic, Polona. “CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM”. The Boğaziçi Law Review, c. 3, sy 1, Haziran 2025, ss. 28-63, doi:10.69800/blr.1627717.
Vancouver
1.Polona Florijancic. CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE THROUGH TERRORISM LAWS: CASE OF UNITED KINGDOM. BLR. 01 Haziran 2025;3(1):28-63. doi:10.69800/blr.1627717