Effectiveness of Using Dual-source CT and the Upshot it creates on Both Heart Rate and Image Quality

Abstract

Background: Early detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) is important because of the high morbidity and mortality rates. As invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is an invasive procedure, an alternative diagnostic method; coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), has become more widely used by the improvements in detector technology. Aims: In this study, we aimed to examine the accuracy and image quality of high-pitch 128-slice dual-source CTA taking the ICA as reference technique. We also aimed to compare the accuracy and image quality between different heart rate groups of >70 beates per minute (bpm) and ≤70 bpm. Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Among 450 patients who underwent coronary CTA with the FLASH spiral technique, performed with a second generation dual-source computed tomography device with a pitch value of 3.2, 102 patients without stent and/or bypass surgery history and clinically suspected coronary artery disease who underwent ICA within 15 days were enrolled. Image quality was assessed by two independent radiologists using a 4-point scale (1=absence of any artifacts- 4=non-evaluable). A stenosis >50% was considered significant on a per-segment, per-vessel, and per-patient basis and ICA was considered the reference method. Radiation doses were determined using dose length product (DLP) values detected by the computed tomography (CT) device. In addition, patients were classified into two groups according to their heart rates as ≤70 bpm (73 patients) and >70 bpm (29 patients). The relation between the diagnostic accuracy and heart rate groups were evaluated. Results: Overall, 1495 (98%) coronary segments were diagnostic in 102 patients (32 male, 70 female, mean heart rate: 65 bpm). There was a significant correlation between image quality and mean heart rate in the right coronary artery (RCA) segments. The effective radiation dose was 0.98±0.09 mili Sievert (mSv). On a per-patient basis, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 93.8%, 88.8%, 93.8% and 88.8%, respectively. These values were also similar in per-vessel and per-segment basis. Two different groups categorized by mean heart rate had almost similar results in terms of the diagnostic power of dual-source CTA. Conclusion: CTA with a high pitch value is a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic method that can CAD with low radiation doses not only in patients with a heart rate below 70 bpm, but also in patients with higher heart rates.

Keywords

• Computed tomography angiography, coronary arteries, high-pitch, low radiation dose, heart rate

Kaynakça

1. 1. de Azevedo CF, Hadlich MS, Bezerra SG, Petriz JL, Alves RR, de Souza O, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiographyin patients with inconclusive functional stres tests. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:740-51. [CrossRef]
2. 2. Hong YJ, Kim SJ, Lee SM, Min PK, Yoon YW, Lee BK, et al. Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:425-31. [CrossRef]
3. 3. Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T, Hein F, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:404-11. [CrossRef]
4. 4. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, Pflederer T, Anders K, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:328-37. [CrossRef]
5. 5. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, Katoh O, Matsubara T, Terashima M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenoses in an unselected consequtive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006;70:564-71. [CrossRef]
6. 6. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7. [CrossRef]
7. 7. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7. [CrossRef]
8. 8. Bayraktutan U, Kantarcı M, Gundogdu F, Demirelli S, Yuce I, Oğul H, et al. Efficacy of ivabradin to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography: comparison with beta-blocker. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012;18:537-41.

9. 9. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, Flohr T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2576-83. [CrossRef]
10. 10. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Anders K, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010;31:340-6. [CrossRef]
11. 11. Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 2009;18:1188-98. [CrossRef]
12. 12. Sagsoz ME, Bayraktutan U, Ogul H, Kantarci M. Chest Circumference as a predictive parameter of computed tomography coronary angiography radiation doses from dual-source computed tomography. Eurasian J Med 2013;45:43-6. [CrossRef]
13. 13. Ertel D, Lell MM, Harig F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA. Cardaic spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2357-62. [CrossRef]
14. 14. Xia Y, Junjie Y, Ying Z, Bai H, Qi W, Qinhua J, et al. Accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral mode for the assessment of coronarystents: first in vivo experience. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:617-22. [CrossRef]
15. 15. Buechel RR, Pazhenkottil AP, Herzog BA, Brueckner M, Nkoulou R, Ghadri JR, et al. Prognostic performance of low-dose coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Heart 2011;97:1385-90. [CrossRef]
16. 16. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronaryCT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-7. [CrossRef]
17. 17. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Bruder H, Allmendinger T, et al. High-pitch spiral acquisiton: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:117-21. [CrossRef]
18. 18. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-7. [CrossRef]
19. 19. Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Treyer V, et al. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart 2009;95:1656-61.[CrossRef]
20. 20. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multı-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-60. [CrossRef]
21. 21. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Guber I, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008;94:1132-7. [CrossRef]
22. 22. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Baumueller S, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart 2010;96:933-8. [CrossRef]
23. 23. Sun Z. Multislice CT angiography in coronart artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value. World J Cardiol 2010;2:333-43. [CrossRef]
24. 24. Stolzmann P, Goetti R, Baumueller S, Plass A, Falk V, Scheffel H, et al. Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates. Eur J Radiol 2011;79:85-91. [CrossRef