Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Uterine Zones Related to the Menstrual Cycle and Menopausal Status at 3 Tesla MRI

Abstract

Background: Diffusion and diffusion tensor imaging techniques (DTI) are widely available and used both in central nervous system and body imaging, including gynecological diseases. Aims: The aims of this study were to assess the capability of DTI of uterine zones in relation to the menstrual cycle and ascertain the normal apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy values at 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Prospective clinical study. Methods: A total of 13 young reproductive and 12 postmenopausal healthy volunteers were included in the study. MRI examination included sagittal T2-weighted and single-shot echo planar imaging DTI obtained under free breathing. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the endometrium, junctional zone, and myometrium were determined. Results: The median (minimum-maximum) FA of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone of the reproductive group were 0.31 (0.260-0.465), 0.42 (0.302-0.664), and 0.58 (0.420-0.745), respectively, in the proliferative phase and 0.26 (0.180-0.413), 0.48 (0.357-0.656), and 0.59 (0.490-0.675)], respectively, in the secretory phase. In the postmenopausal group, the FA values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone were 0.275 (0.136-0.425), 0.255 (0.191-0.553), and 0.27 (0.129-0.397), respectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone of the reproductive group were 1.25±0.254 (0.970-1.463), 1.67 (1.213-1.854), and 1.23 (0.853-1.301), respectively, in the proliferative phase and 1.32±0.283 (1.165-1.706), 1.55 (1.360-1.791), and 1.17 (1.163-1.705), respectively, in the secretory phase. In the postmenopausal group, the ADC values of the endometrium, myometrium, and junctional zone were measured as 1.100±0.192 (0.850-1.302), 1.14 (0.864-1.283), and 1.09 (0.912-1.291). The FA values of the endometrium and myometrium were lower in the secretory phase of the reproductive group, while ADC values were higher. However, both the FA and ADC values were lower in the postmenopausal group. Conclusion: The present study showed that uterine DTI is feasible when used quantitatively. While FA values tend to decrease, ADC values increase significantly in all zones in the secretory phase except the junctional zone. Zonal FA and ADC values of postmenopausal women are lower in comparison to those in young women.

Keywords

• Diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy, uterus, menstrual cycle

Kaynakça

1. 1. Koyama T, Togashi K. Functional MR imaging of the female pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:1101-12. [CrossRef]
2. 2. Haynor DR, Mack LA, Soules MR, Shuman WP, Montana MA, Moss AA. Changing appearance of the normal uterus during the menstrual cycle: MR studies. Radiology 1986;161:459-62. [CrossRef]
3. 3. Hricak H. MRI of the female pelvis: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:1115-22. [CrossRef]
4. 4. Kido A, Kataoka M, Koyama T, Yamamoto A, Saga T, Togashi K. Changes in apparent diffusion coefficients in the normal uterus during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Br J Radiol 2010;83:524-8. [CrossRef]
5. 5. Kilickesmez O, Bayramoglu S, Inci E, Cimilli T, Kayhan A. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones. Acta Radiol 2009;50:340-7. [CrossRef]
6. 6. Charles-Edwards EM, deSouza NM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer. Cancer Imaging 2006;6:135-43. [CrossRef]
7. 7. Namimoto T, Awai K, Nakaura T, Yanaga Y, Hirai T, Yamashita Y. Role of diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases. Eur Radiol 2009;19:745-60. [CrossRef]
8. 8. Toba M, Miyasaka N, Sakurai U, Yamada I, Eishi Y, Kubota T. Diagnostic possibility of diffusion tensor imaging for the evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: an ex vivo study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:616-22. [CrossRef]

9. 9. Bammer R, Acar B, Moseley ME. In vivo MR tractography using diffusion imaging. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:223-34. [CrossRef]
10. 10. Fiocchi F, Nocetti L, Siopis E, Currà S, Costi T, Ligabue G, et al. In vivo 3 T MR diffusion tensor imaging for detection of the fibre architecture of the human uterus: a feasibility and quantitative study. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1009-17. [CrossRef]
11. 11. Yonglan H, Ding N, Xue HD, Jin Z, Ha S, Cao J. Cyclic changes of the uterus and cervix in young and middle-aged women during the menstrual cycle: an initial 3T MR functional imaging study based on T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences. ECR 2014 DOI: 10.1594/ecr2014/C-0498.
12. 12. Weiss S, Jaermann T, Schmid P, Staempfli P, Boesiger P, Niederer P, et al. Three-dimensional fiber architecture of the nonpregnant human uterus determined ex vivo using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006;288:84-90. [CrossRef]
13. 13. Fujimoto K, Kido A, Okada T, Uchikoshi M, Togashi K. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the normal human uterus in vivo at 3 tesla: comparison of DTI parameters in the different uterine layers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:1494-500. [CrossRef]
14. 14. Thrippleton MJ, Bastin ME, Munro KI, Williams AR, Oniscu A, Jansen MA, et al. Ex vivo water diffusion tensor properties of the fibroid uterus at 7 T and their relation to tissue morphology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1445-51. [CrossRef]
15. 15. Kuang F, Ren J, Huan Y, Chen Z, Zhong Q. Apparent diffusion coefficients of normal uterus in premenopausal women with 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36:54-9. [CrossRef]
16. 16. Burger HG, Hale GE, Dennerstein L, Robertson DM. Cycle and hormone changes during perimenopause: the key role of ovarian function. Menopause 2008;15:603-12. [CrossRef]
17. 17. He YL, Ding N, Xue HD, editors. Cyclic Changes of the Female Reproductive System in Young and Middle-aged Women during the Menstrual Cycle: an Initial 3T MRI Study based on T2 3DSpace Sequence. Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of ESR: Vienna, 2014. (abstract 2939)
18. 18. He Y, Ding N, Li Y, Li Z, Xiang Y, Jin Z, et al. H. 3-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of normal uterus in young and middleaged females during the menstrual cycle: evaluation of the cyclic changes of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150043. Epub 2015 Mar 18. [CrossRef]
19. 19. Fornasa F, Montemezzi S. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the normal endometrium: temporal and spatial variations of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Acta Radiol 2010;53:586-90. [CrossRef]
20. 20. Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Tzarouchi L, Dalkalitsis N, Koliopoulos G, Paraskevaidis E, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal uterus: Interindividual variations during menstrual cycle. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1951-6. [CrossRef]
21. 21. Roberts DK, Lavia LA, Horbelt DV, Walker NJ. Changes in nuclear and nucleolar areas of endometrial glandular cells throughout the menstrual cycle. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1989;8:36-45. [CrossRef]
22. 22. Christian M, Marangos P, Mak I, McVey J, Barker F, White J, et al. Interferon-gamma modulates prolactin and tissue factor expression in differentiating human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 2001;142:3142-5. [CrossRef]
23. 23. Song JY, Fraser IS. Effects of progestogens on human endometrium. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995;50:385-94. [CrossRef