EN
A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment option for both malignant and some benign hematological diseases. During the last decade, many of the newer high-dose regimens in different intensity have been developed specifically for patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Today there are three main approaches used prior to allogeneic transplantation: Myeloablative (MA), Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Non-MA (NMA) regimens. MA regimens cause irreversible cytopenia and there is a requirement for stem cell support. Patients who receive NMA regimen have minimal cytopenia and this type of regimen can be given without stem cell support. RIC regimens do not fit the criteria of MA and NMA: the cytopenia is reversible and the stem cell support is necessary. NMA/RIC for Allo-HSCT has opened a new era for treating elderly patients and those with comorbidities. The RIC conditioning was used for 40% of all Allo-HSCT and this trend continue to increase. In this paper, we will review these regimens in the setting of especially allogeneic HSCT and our aim is to describe the history, features and impact of these conditioning regimens on specific diseases.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009;15:1628-33.
- 2. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Gratwohl A, Bregni M, Cesaro S, Dreger P, et al. The EBMT activity survey:1990-2010. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012;47:906-23.
- 3. Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, Besinger WI, Sanders J, Lambert K, et al. Busulfan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for autologous or syngeneic marrow transplantation for acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulfan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;17:491- 5.
- 4. Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, Lambert K, Besinger WI, Clift R, et al. Busulfan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation for allogeneic marrow transplantation in advanced acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia: phase I dose escalation of busulfan based on targeted plasma levels. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;17:341- 6.
- 5. De Giorgi U, Rosti G, Slavin S, Yaniv I, Harousseau JL, Ladenstein R, et al. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy for children with extragonadal germcell tumours. Br J Cancer 2005;93:412-7.
- 6. Pedrazzoli P, Ledermann JA, Lotz JP, Leyvraz S, Aglietta M, Rosti G, et al. High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors other than breast cancer in adults. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1479-88.
- 7. Ladenstein R, Pötschger U, Hartman O, Pearson AD, Klingebiel, Castel V, et al. 28 years of high-dose therapy and SCT for neuroblastoma in Europe: lessons from more than 4000 procedures. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;41(Suppl 2):118-27.
- 8. Bensinger WI, Demirer T, Buckner CD, Appelbaum FR, Storb R, Lilleby K, et al. Syngeneic marrow transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;18:527-31.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Ocak 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Ocak 2017
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1
APA
Atilla, E., Atilla, P. A., & Demirer, T. (2017). A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balkan Medical Journal, 34(1), 1-9. https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ
AMA
1.Atilla E, Atilla PA, Demirer T. A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balkan Medical Journal. 2017;34(1):1-9. https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ
Chicago
Atilla, Erden, Pınar Ataca Atilla, ve Taner Demirer. 2017. “A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations”. Balkan Medical Journal 34 (1): 1-9. https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ.
EndNote
Atilla E, Atilla PA, Demirer T (01 Ocak 2017) A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balkan Medical Journal 34 1 1–9.
IEEE
[1]E. Atilla, P. A. Atilla, ve T. Demirer, “A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations”, Balkan Medical Journal, c. 34, sy 1, ss. 1–9, Oca. 2017, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ
ISNAD
Atilla, Erden - Atilla, Pınar Ataca - Demirer, Taner. “A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations”. Balkan Medical Journal 34/1 (01 Ocak 2017): 1-9. https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ.
JAMA
1.Atilla E, Atilla PA, Demirer T. A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balkan Medical Journal. 2017;34:1–9.
MLA
Atilla, Erden, vd. “A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations”. Balkan Medical Journal, c. 34, sy 1, Ocak 2017, ss. 1-9, https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ.
Vancouver
1.Erden Atilla, Pınar Ataca Atilla, Taner Demirer. A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations. Balkan Medical Journal [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2017;34(1):1-9. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78EX36KZ