A Comparison of Sexual Function, Psychological Status, and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Turkish Men within Polygamous and Monogamous Marriages

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4, 383 - 389, 01.07.2016

Hasan Çetin Ekerbiçer Sefa Resim Erkan Efe Mustafa Remzi Bahar , Özlem Altunören Faruk Küçükdurmaz Can Benlioğlu

Öz

Background: A limited number of studies within the literature have entailed objective evaluations of psychological, sexual, and emotional features of women within polygamous marriages. However, there is a lack of studies reporting these features among polygamous and monogamous men. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate sociodemographic characteristics, sexual function, and psychological status of polygamously and monogamously married men. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The study sample comprised two groups: 35 polygamous and 45 monogamous men in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey. Door-to-door surveys covered sociodemographic factors and adopted Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and International Index of Erectile Function – Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD) scales. Results: Polygamous men showed considerably higher IIEF-EFD scores (p<0.05). While the median score of IIEFEFD was 25.0 for polygamous men, it was 22.0 for monogamous men. A comparison of the two groups revealed that polygamous men had lower BDI scores. However, the difference between the groups was statistically non-significant (p>0.05). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of monogamous men for erectile dysfunction and depression were 14.4 (95% CI: 3.1-67.5) and 7.4 (95% CI: 0.9-61.9), respectively. The main reasons for multiple marriages reported by polygamous men, in descending order, were: 1) decreased satisfaction of sexual desires by a wife (37.1%); 2) falling in love with the second wife (22.8%); and 3) incompatibility with the first wife (17.1%). However, 62.9% of them responded negatively to the question: “Would you recommend polygamous marriage to other men?” Conclusion: Our results showed that polygamous men had higher erectile function and lower depression scores than monogamous men. Further studies investigating the effects of polygamy on men’s psychosexual function are warranted. Additionally, studies that address the perspectives of offspring and women’s expectations within polygamous marriages should be conducted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beck Depression Inventory, erectile status, polygamy, polygamous men

Kaynakça

• 1. Al-Krenawi A, Slonim-Nevo V. Psychosocial and familial functioning of children from polygynous and monogamous families. J Soc Psychol 2008;148:745-64. [Crossref]
• 2. Al-Krenawi A, Graham JR. Helping Professional practice with indigenous peoples: The Bedouin-Arab case. Lanham, MD: University Press of America; 2009.
• 3. Brooks T. The problem with polygamy. Philosophical Topics 2009;37:109-22. [Crossref]
• 4. Olley BO. Predictors of Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Use among Nigerian Freshmen. African J Med Sci 2004;33:327-33.
• 5. Read N. “The hidden wives of Turkey”. BBC News 2005-08-30. Accessed 2014-09-16.
• 6. Al-Krenawi A. Family therapy with a multiparental/multispousal family. Family Process 1998;37:65-82. [Crossref]
• 7. Basker M, Moses PD, Russell S, Swamidhas P, Russell S. The psychometric properties of Beck Depression Inventory for adolescent depression in a primary-care paediatric setting in India. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2007;1:1-7. [Crossref]
• 8. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822-30. [Crossref]
• 9. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999;54:346- 51. [Crossref]
• 10. White DR, Betzig L, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Chick G, Hartung J, Irons W, et al. Rethinking polygyny: co-wives, codes, and cultural systems (includes comments and author’s reply). Curr Anthropol 1988;29:529-72. [Crossref]
• 11. Marlowe FW. The mating system of foragers in the standard crosscultural sample. Cross-Cult Res 2003;37:282-306. [Crossref]