Changes in Employment Status after Myocardial Infarction among Men

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4, 0 - 0, 01.07.2016

Ceyda Şahan Yücel Demiral Bülent Kılıç Özgür Aslan

Öz

Abstrack Background: According to the Turkey Burden of Disease Study, 10% of the national burden of disease is attributed to cardiovascular diseases. Although the standardized coronary heart disease (CHD) rate is falling in general, CHD prevalence among young people is rising. On the other hand, as a result of increased life expectancy and higher retirement ages, the CHD rate among workers is also increasing. Therefore, work ability and return to work after diagnosis are important for population health and well-being. Socioeconomic factors and working conditions may play a key role as well as clinical conditions described in the literature that affect returning to work. Aims: The aims of this qualitative study are exploring the changes in employment and working conditions of the patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and affecting factors such as socioeconomic, personal and environmental. Study design: Qualitative research. Methods: The research population are fifty-three patients who are engaged in paid employment when the people have been diagnosed with myocardial infarction for the first time between 2011 and 2012 at a university hospital coronary care unit. We intended to reach the whole population. Twenty- seven patients were contacted whose phone numbers were accessible from the hospital records. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with twelve patients in a meeting room at the hospital. The interviews were tape-recorded accompanied by note-taking and the content analysis method were evaluated. Results: While many of the participants continued to work at the same job by working less, one third of them said that they were thinking about getting an easier job if they have the opportunity. On the other hand, in most cases, there were neither assessments about their work ability, nor changes to their working conditions after AMI. They had to cope with their conditions, such as economic or psychosocial, without any support. Conclusions: While the patients have to return to work for economic and social reasons, they expressed uncertainty about working after a diagnosis of AMI and could not reach professional support to assess their work abilities. Therefore, specific algorithms and assessment tools to manage the return to work of AMI patients would be useful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employment, myocardial infarction, return to work, working conditions

Kaynakça

• 1. Türkiye Hastalık Yükü Çalışması 2004. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Refik Saydam Hıfzısıhha Merkezi Başkanlığı, Hıfzısıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü. 1.Baskı. Ankara: Aydoğdu Ofset; 2007:1-12.
• 2. Wagner A, Arveiler D, Ruidavets JB, Bingham A, Montaye M, Ferrieres J, et al. Gender- and age-specific trends in coronary heart disease mortality in France from 2000 to 2007: results from the MONICA registers. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014;21:117- 22. [Crossref]
• 3. Alavinia SM, Burdorf A. Unemployment and retirement and illhealth: a cross-sectional analysis across European countries. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008;82:39-45. [Crossref]
• 4. Black D. Working for a healthier tomorrow 2008 [09.03.2015]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/209782/hwwb-working-fora-healthier-tomorrow.pdf.
• 5. Durmaz T, Özdemir Ö, Özdemir B, Keleş T, Bayram N, Bozkurt E. Factors affecting quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. Turk J Med Sci 2009;39:343-51.
• 6. Bradshaw PJ, Jamrozik K, Gilfillan IS, Thompson PL. Return toWork After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Population of Long-Term Survivors. Heart Lung Circ 2005;14:191-6. [Crossref]
• 7. Mirmohammadi SJ, Sadr-Bafghi SM, Mehrparvar AH, Gharavi M, Davari MH, Bahaloo M, et al. Evaluation of the return to work and its duration after myocardial infarction. ARYA atheroscler 2014;10:137-40.
• 8. Mark D, Lam L, Lee K, Clapp-Channing N, Williams R, Pryor D, et al. Identification of patients with coronary disease at high risk for loss of employment. A prospective validation study. Circulation 1992;86:1485-94. [Crossref]
• 9. Dekkers-Sánchez P, Wind H, Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen M. A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long-term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: Chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:544-52. [Crossref]
• 10. Sverke M, Hellgren J, Naswall K. Job insecurity: A literature review. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life, 2006.
• 11. De Souza L, Frank A. Patients’ experiences of the impact of chronic back pain on family life and work. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:310-8. [Crossref]
• 12. Slebus FG, Jorstad HT, Peters RJ, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Sluiter JK, et al. Return to work after an acute coronary syndrome: patients’ perspective. Saf Health Work 2012;3:117-22. [Crossref]
• 13. Emslie C. Women, men and coronary heart disease: a review of the qualitative literature. J Adv Nurs 2005;51:382-95. [Crossref]
• 14. King KM. Gender and short-term recovery from cardiac surgery. Nursing Res 2000;49:29-36. [Crossref]
• 15. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. 1963.
• 16. Lee SM, Lim LC, Koh D. Stigma among workers attending a hospital specialist diabetes clinic. Occup Med 2015;65:67-71. [Crossref]
• 17. Boutin-Foster C. Getting to the heart of social support: a qualitative analysis of the types of instrumental support that are most helpful in motivating cardiac risk factor modification. Heart Lung 2005;34:22-9. [Crossref]
• 18. Bhattacharyya MR, Perkins-Porras L, Whitehead DL, Steptoe A. Psychological and clinical predictors of return to work after acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2007;28:160-5. [Crossref]
• 19. Brink E, Brandstrom Y, Cliffordsson C, Herlitz J, Karlson BW. Illness consequences after myocardial infarction: problems with physical functioning and return to work. J Adv Nurs 2008;64:587-94. [Crossref]
• 20. McBurney CR, Eagle KA, Kline-Rogers EM, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Erickson SR. Work-related outcomes after a myocardial infarction. Pharmacotherapy 2004;24:1515-23. [Crossref]