Respiratory Systems of Dental Technicians Negatively Affected during 5 Years of Follow-Up

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4, 426 - 433, 01.07.2016

Nurgül Bozkurt Belkıs Yurdasal Ali İhsan Bozkurt Özlem Yılmaz Mahmut Tekin

Öz

Abstrack Background: Dental laboratory technician is one of the professions in which dust exposure is frequently experienced and therefore the health of workers has to be monitored. Aims: In this study, changes in the pulmonary functions and of pneumoconiosis frequencies among dental technicians after five years were investigated by comparing the results of two screenings carried out in 2008 and 2013. Study Design: Cohort study. Methods: In 2008 and 2013, Provincial Health Directorate carried out two different health screenings covering all of the dental technicians working in dental laboratories in Denizli. In both screenings, a questionnaire was applied, with which socio-demographic and workplace properties of the technicians were obtained. In addition, Pulmonary function tests (PFT) and standard chest X-rays of the technicians were performed. The results of these two screenings were evaluated by a chest specialist, and physical examinations were performed as necessary. In 2013, technicians who had pathologies underwent computerized tomography (HRCT). In this study, the study group was composed of dental laboratory technicians that participated in both screenings (2008 and 2013) and the data obtained from the screenings were compared. The gathered data were analyzed using paired student-t and X2 tests. Results: A total of 125 dental laboratory technicians participated in the two screenings. Overall, 92% of the technicians were male and the mean age of the participants was 35. Technicians were working for 9 hours a day, 6 days a week. Total exposure time was calculated to be around 41 thousand hours. Approximately 60% of workers were smokers. When the results of PFT were analyzed, 73% of the first evaluations were found to be normal; however, this ratio decreased to 51% in the second analysis five years later. In the second PFT measurement, compared to the first, there was a 23% decrease in the forced vital capacity (FVC) value, and a 15.7% decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). While restrictive disorder was found 25% in the first PFT evaluations, this ratio increased to 31% in the second PFT. When the radiological results were considered, 62% of the first X-ray results were found to be normal but this ratio decreased to 18% in 2013. While reticular/reticulonodular opacities were found in 11% of cases in 2008, it increased to 30% in 2013. Seven technicians were diagnosed with pneumoconiosis (5.6%). Conclusion: Respiratory tracts of the technicians were negatively affected during the five year period. The number of pneumoconiosis cases (5.6%) shows that it is necessary to adopt comprehensive work health and safety precautions for laboratories.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental technicians, pneumoconiosis, respiratory

Kaynakça

• 1. Akar GC. Diş protez laboratuvarında çalışan kişilerin karşılaştıkları mesleki riskler. İstanbul Dişhekimleri Odası Dergi 2011:72-6.
• 2. Ireland AJ, Wilson AA, Blythe L, Johnston NJ, Price R, SandyJR. Particulate production during orthodontic production laboratory procedures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2011;21:536- 40. [Crossref]
• 3. Canıvar C. Health risks and occupational diseases caused by the relations of production in the dental technician.http://www.sendika.org/2013/01.
• 4. Kılıç MM, Çeviksoy N, Coşkunses FI. Diş protezi laboratuvarlarında sağlık ve güvenlik risk faktörlerinin araştırılması. http://www.isgum.gov.tr/rsm/file/isgdoc/IG8-is_ protez_lab_isg.pdf.
• 5. Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: A review. Ind Health 2007;45:611-21. [Crossref]
• 6. Choudat D. Occupational lung diseases among dental technicians. Tuber Lung Dis 1994;75:99-104. [Crossref]
• 7. Choudat D, Triem S, Weill B, Vicrey C, Ameille J, Brochard P, et al. Respiratory symptoms, lung function, and pneumoconiosis among self employed dental technicians. Br J Ind Med 1993;50:443-9. [Crossref]
• 8. The Report; Prevention of exposure to the Dental Prosthetics Laboratory Technician Working in pneumoconiosis and other Occupational Disease. T. C. Ministry of Labor and Social Security. Ankara: 2013.
• 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Silicosis in dental laboratory technicians five states, 1994-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:195-7.
• 10. Karabıyık S. Occupational exposure and risk of pneumoconiosis in dental technicians, Thesis, Ankara: 2008.
• 11. Ergün D, Ergün R, Özdemir C, Öziş TN, Yilmaz H, Akkurt I. Pneumoconiosis and respiratory problems in dental laboratory technicians: Analysis of 893 dental technicians. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2014:1-12. [Crossref]
• 12. Doğan DO, Ozdemir AK, Polat NT, Dal U, Gümüş C, Akkurt İ. Prevalence of respiratory abnormalities and pneumoconiosis in dental laboratory technicians. Tuberkuloz ve Toraks 2010;58:135-41.
• 13. Adult Tobacco Use Information:CDC/National Center for Health Statistics http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_glossary.htm.
• 14. Suganuma N, Kusaka, Y, Hiraga Y, Hosoda Y, Shida H, Morikubo H, et al. Asbestos-related pleural abnormalities detected by chest x-ray: fair agreement with detection by computed tomography. J Occup Health 2001;43:365-70. [Crossref]
• 15. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Dust and Its Control https://www.osha.gov/dsg/topics/silicacrystalline/dust/chapter_1.html.
• 16. Akar CG, Aksoy G, Özmutaf N M, Akar, H. An assessment of awareness and self-report about occupatıon-related health problems among dental laboratory technıcıans In Turkey. Nobel Med 2009;5:27-32.
• 17. Alavi A, Shakiba M, Nejat AT, Massahnia S, Shiari A. Respiratory Findings in Dental laboratory Technicians in Rasht (Nort of Iran). Tanaffos 2011;10:44-9.
• 18. Brune D, Beltesbrekke H. Dust in dental laboratories. Part I: Types and levels in specific operations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:687-92. [Crossref]
• 19. Jacobsen N, Pettersen HA. Self-reported occupation–related health complaints among dental laboratory technicians. Quintessence Int J 1993;24:409-15.
• 20. Özdemir D, Berk S, Gumus C, Ozdemir A K, Akkurt I. A longitudinal study on lung disease in dental technicians: What has changed after seven years? Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2013;26:693-701.
• 21. Fidan S. The incidence of silicosis in dental prosthetic technicians. Gazi Univ. SBE PhD thesis. Ankara: 2002.
• 22. Radi S, Dalphin JC, Manzoni P, Pernet D, Leboube MP, Viel JF. Respiratory morbidity in a population of French dental technicians. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:398-404. [Crossref]
• 23. Çımrın A, Kömüs N, Karaman C, Tertemiz KC. Pneumoconiosis and work-related health complaints in Turkish dental laboratory workers. Tuberk Toraks 2009;57:282-8.
• 24. Berk M, Önal B, Güven R. Occupational Diseases Textbook, T. C. Ministry of Labour and Social Security. Matsa Press, Ankara:2011:11.
• 25. Abakay A, Atılgan S, Abakay O, Atalay Y, Güven S, Yaman F, et al. Frequency of respiratory function disorders among dental laboratory technicians working under conditions of high dust concentration. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:809-14.
• 26. Rom WN, Lockey JE, Lee JS, Kimball AC, Bang KM, Leaman H, et al. Pneumoconiosis and exposures of Dental Laboratory Technicians. Am J Public Health 1984;74:1252-7. [Crossref]
• 27. Hu SW, Lin YY, Wu TC, Hong CC, Chan CC, Lung SC. Workplace air quality and lung function among dental laboratory technicians. Am J Ind Med 2006;49:85-92. [Crossref]
• 28. Fişekçi F, Ozkurt S, Akkoyunlu S, Başer S. Lung disorders among dental technicians. Proc. ERS Annual Congress, Geneva 1998;12:140S.
• 29. Jacobsen N, Derand T, Hensten-Pettersen A. Profile of workrelated health complaints among Swedish dental laboratory technicians. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996:138-44. [Crossref]
• 30. The Report of Turkish Thoracic Society Silicosis Prevention Initiative Group http://www. toraks.org.tr/sub/yayinlar/pdf/357. pdf)