Türkiye Nohut Varlığının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Belirlenmesi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 56 - 75, 30.12.2025

Ömer Faruk Karaca , Bekir Aktaş , Ali Endes

https://doi.org/10.59128/bojans.1821622

Öz

Nohut, mercimekten sonra kurak ve sıcak iklimlere en dayanıklı ikinci yemeklik baklagil bitkisidir. Fakir topraklarda üretime elverişli olması nedeniyle, nadas alanlarının kaldırılması veya azaltılmasında uygulanabilir bir bitkidir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de ekim alanı ve üretim açısından önde gelen baklagillerden biri olan nohudun ekim alanı, üretim ve verim potansiyellerini Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) kullanarak inceleyerek mevcut durumu ortaya koymaktır. Böylece, karar vericiler ve üreticiler için üretim planlama ve izleme süreçleri kontrol altına alınabilir. Bu amaçla, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) ve Birleşmiş Milletler Gıda ve Tarım Örgütü'nden (FAO) son 5 yıla ait veriler kullanılarak mekânsal projeksiyonu değerlendirmek üzere kartografik haritalar üretilmiştir. Bu veriler ve önceden hazırlanmış WGS-84 UTM-Zone-36 projeksiyon taban şekil (.shp) dosyaları yardımıyla Türkiye ve Dünya yoğunluk haritaları oluşturulmuştur. Türkiye, yıllık 580.000 tonluk üretimle Hindistan (1.354.3630 ton) ve Avustralya'nın (1.062.250 ton) ardından üçüncü büyük nohut üreticisidir. Hasat alanı bakımından 456.480 hektar ile 4., verim bakımından ise 23. sıradadır. En çok ekilen ürünler arasında nohut (458.7718 hektar) ilk sırada yer alırken, onu kırmızı mercimek (278.1522 hektar) ikinci, kuru fasulye (884.569 hektar) ise üçüncü sırada takip etmektedir. Bölgesel düzeyde, nohut üretiminin en yoğun olduğu bölge İç Anadolu Bölgesi'dir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Baklagiller , Cicer arietinum , Türkiye , Uzaktan algılama , Verim

Determination Chickpea Presence in Türkiye with Geographic Information Systems

Öz

Chickpea is the second most resistant food grain legume crop to arid and hot climates after lentil. Given its feasibility for production in poor soils, it represents a viable crop for implementation in the removal or reduction of fallow lands. In this context, the aim of the study is to reveal the current situation by examining the cultivated area, production, and yield potentials of chickpea, which is among the foremost legumes regarding cultivation area and production in Türkiye, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Thus, production planning and monitoring processes can be brought under control for decision-makers and producers. To this end, cartographic maps have been produced to evaluate the spatial projection using the last 5 years of data obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). With the aid of these data and pre-prepared WGS-84 UTM-Zone-36 projection base shape (.shp) files, density maps of Türkiye and the world have been created. Türkiye ranks as the third-largest chickpea producer with an annual production of 580000 tons, following India (13543630 tons) and Australia (1062250 tons). It ranks 4th in terms of harvested area with 456480 ha and 23rd in terms of yield. Chickpea (4587718 ha) ranks first among the most planted products, followed by red lentils (2781522 ha) in second place, and dry beans (884569 ha) in third place. At the regional level, the Central Anatolia Region is where chickpea production is most intensive.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cicer arietinum , Legumes , Remote sensing , Türkiye , Yield

Kaynakça

• Akçin, A. (1998). Food Legumes. Konya Selçuk University, Pub. 8., Türkiye.
• Arıcı, Ş. E. and Seven, M.A. (2018) Integrated disease management of chickpea anthracnose (Ascochyta rabiei). Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology 11: 488-498.
• Avcı, M., Aydın, N. and Meyveci, K. (2004). Field Crops 1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Organization and Support, Common Farmer Education Project.
• Aydemir, L. and Yemenicioğlu, A. (2013). Potential of Turkish Kabuli Type Chickpea and Green and Red Lentil Cultivars as Source of Soy and Animal Origin Functional Protein Alternatives. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 50(2): 686-694.
• Azkan, N. (1989). Food Grain Legumes. Uludağ University, Faculty of Agriculture, Lecture Notes, No: 40, Bursa, Türkiye.
• Bhaliya, C.M, Kapadiya, H.J., Chavda, J.G., Keleiya, D.S. and Thanki, R.B. (2023). Inoculation Techniques for Assessing Pathogenicity of Fusarium spp. and Macrophomina Phaseolina on Chickpea. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(6): 656-659.
• Bayrak, H. (2010). Determination of agricultural, technological and nutritional characteristics of local chickpea populations and varieties cultivated in Konya ecology. (PhD Thesis) Selçuk University Institute of Science Field Crops, Konya.
• Bayraktar, H., Dolar, F. and Tör, M. (2007). Determination of genetic diversity within ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., the cause of ascochyta blight of chickpea in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 89(3): 341-347.
• Biçer, B., Kalendar, A. and Şakar, D. (2004). The effectof irrigation on spring-sown chickpea. Journal of Agronomy, 3(3): 154-158.
• Burucu, D. (2024). Dry legume product report. General Directorate of Agricultural Reform, Agricultural Economics and Policy Development Institute, Research Publications, TEPGE, No:405, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Canci, H. and Toker, C. (2009). Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 19(5): 47-54.
• Ceyhan, E. (2007). Food Grain Legumes Lecture Notes. Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Konya, Türkiye.
• Chen, E., Gao, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, L. and Lin, W. (2025). Assessing legume crop growth and yield prediction using drone-based remote sensing. Arcc Journals Legume Research, LRF-868, 1-7, https:/doi.org/10.18805/LRF-868
• Choudhary, S., Gaur, R., Gupta, S., and Bhatia, S. (2012). EST-derived genic molecular markers: development and utilization for generating an advanced transcript map of chickpea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 124(8):1449-1458.
• Delve, R.J., Huising, R.J. and Bagenze, P. (2007). Target area identification using a GIS approach for the introduction of legume cover crops for soil productivity improvement: A case study eastern Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(10): 512-520.
• Endes, A. and Atmaca, S. (2022). Determination of the resistance status of ascochyta rabiei in chickpeas to some commercial fungicides. Çukurova Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 37(2): 241-249. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2022.91
• Eser, D. and Soran, H. (1978). Comparative Examination of Local and Foreign Chickpea Varieties in Terms of Earliness, Productivity and Disease Resistance Under Central Anatolian Environmental Conditions. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Ankara, Türkiye.
• FAO (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL, (Accessed date: 01.15.2025).
• Ferguson, B.J., Indrasumunar, A., Hayashi, S., Lin, M.H., Lin, Y.H., Reid, D.E. and Gresshoff, P.M. (2010). Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation. J. Integr Plant Biol., 52: 61-76.
• Flynn, K.C., Baath, G., Lee, T.O., Gowda, P. and Northup, B. (2023). Hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning to monitor legume biomass and nitrogen accumulation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 211: 107991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107991
• Gülümser, A. (2016). The situation of edible pulse legumes in the world and in Turkey. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 25 (Special issue-1): 292-298.
• Güneş, A., Inal, A., Adak, M.S., Bagci, E. G., Cicek, N. and Eraslan, F. (2008). Effect of drought stress implemented at pre or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 55: 59-67.
• HGK (2025). Turkish Civil Administrative Borders, https://www.harita.gov.tr/urun/turkiye-mulki-idare-sinirlari/232, (Accessed date: 15.01.2025).
• Huisman, J. and van der Poel, A.F.B. (1994). Aspects of the nutritional quality and use of cool season food legumes in animal feed. Expanding the production and use of cool season food legumes, Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, p.53-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0798-3_2
• İdikut, L., Uskutoğlu, D., Göktaş, K.E., Sakin, S.Ç. and Karadeniz, S. (2022). Investigation of winter cultivation of different chickpea varieties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 10(sp1): 2675-2684. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10isp1.2675-2684.5635
• Karaca, Ö. F., Ertuğrul, M., Eryılmaz, T. (2025). Determination of oilseed production potential using geographic information systems: The case of Balıkesir Province. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 22(2): 441-460. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1545676.
• Karakullukçu, E. and Adak, M. (2008). Determination of salt tolerance of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. Ankara University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(4): 313-319.
• Kawamura, K., Tanaka, T., Yasuda, T., Okoshi, S., Hanada, M., Doi, K., Saigusa, T., Yagi, T., Sudo, K., Okumura, K. and Lim, J. (2024). Legume content estimation from UAV image in grass-legume meadows: comparison methods based on the UAV coverage vs. field biomass. Science Report 14, 31705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82055-w
• Ladizinsky, G. and Adler, A. (1976). Genetic relationships among the annual species of cicer L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 48: 197-203.
• Malhotra, R. and Singh, K. (1991). Gene action for cold tolerance in chickpea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 82 (5): 598-601.
• Nene, Y., Sheila, V. and Sharma, S.A. (1996). World List of Chickpea and Pigeonpea Pathogens. International Crops Research Institute for the Semiarid Tropics, 5th ed, p.27, India.
• Nigussie, D., Mulugeta, W., Molla, A., Bishaw, Z., & Biradar, C. (2019). GIS-Based multi-criteria land suitability mapping for scaling faba bean varieties in Ethiopia. African Crop Science Journal, 27 (4): 687-708. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v27i4.10
• Oğuz, A. and Erman, M. (2021). Effects of chickpea varieties sown at different times on yield, yield components and nodulation in Siirt ecological conditions. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(3), 564-575. https://doi.org/10.52520/masjaps.114
• Opendatasoft (2025). World Administrative Boundaries-Countries and Territories, https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/world-administrative-boundaries/export/, (Accessed date: 01.10.2025).
• Özkaya E. (2013). The importance of food grain legumes in the Turkish economy. Ziraat Mühendisliği, 360: 22-31.
• Purushothaman, R., Upadhyaya, H.D., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L. and Krishnamurthy, L. (2014). Kabuli and desi chickpeas differ in their requirement for reproductive duration. Field Crops Research, 163: 24-31.
• Reddy, M. and Singh, K. (1984). Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germ plasm accessions for resistance to ascochyta blight. Plant Disease, 68(10): 900-901.
• Sepetoğlu, H. (1994). Food Grain Legumes. Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No: 24, İzmir, Türkiye.
• Singh, K. (1987). Chickpea Breeding. CAB International, England
• Singh, K.B., Malhotra, R.S., Halila, M.H., Knights, E.J. and Verma, M.M. (1994). Current status and future strategy in breeding chickpea for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica, 73: 137-149.
• Soysal, S. (2021). Under different doses of soil applied phosphorus in an agroecology of semi-arid highlands with mediterranean climate. Legume Research. 44(11): 1328-1332. https://doi.org/10.18805/LRF-642
• Sözen, Ö. and Karadavut, U. (2024). Analysis of characters affecting yield and yield in chickpea. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 38(3): 508-523. https://doir.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2024.045
• Şahin, N., and Gecit, H.H. (2006). The effects of different fertilizing methods on yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(3):252-258.
• TAGEM (2019). Legume sector policy document 2019-2023. TAGEM R&D-Innovation, Ankara.
• TMO (2020). Grain Legume Sector Report. General Directorate of Soil Products Office (TMO), Ankara.
• Toğay, N., Toğay, Y., Erman, M., Doğan, Y. and Çığ, F. (2005). Effects of different plant densities on yield and yield components in some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties under dry and irrigated conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(4): 417-421.
• Ton, A., Karaköy, T. and Anlarsal, A. (2014). Problems and solution proposals for food grain legume production in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology (TURJAF), 2(4): 175-180.
• TOVEP (2025). Türkiye topraklarının bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri. Türkiye toprakları verimlilik envanter projesi (TOVEP). (Accessed Date: 20.12.2025). https://www.tarimkutuphanesi.com/TURKIYE_TOPRAKLARININ_BAZI_FIZIKSEL_VE_KIMYASAL_OZELLIKLERI_00287.html
• TÜİK (2025). Crop Production Statistics - Food Grain Legumes, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr, (Accessed date: 01.08.2025)
• Ullah, A., Bakht, J., Shafi, M., Shah, W.A. and Zia-ul-Islam. (2002). Effect of various irrigation levels on different chickpea varieties. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 1(4): 355-357. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.355.357
• Unkovich, M. and Pate, J. (2000). An appraisal of recent field measurements of symbiotic n2 fixation by annual legumes. Field Crops Research, 65: 211-228.
• Uzun, A., Eser, Ü., Düzdemir, O. and Bozoğlu, H. (2024). Evaluation of local chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) populations collected in the western black sea region in terms of blight disease (Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.). ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 34(2): 188-195. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1521566
• Wijesinghe, D.C. and Withanage, W.K.N.C. (2021). Application of the GIS-MCDA to identify land suitability for legume crops cultivation: An empirical investigation based on Thalawa DSD, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Spatial Temporal and Multimedia Information Systems, 10, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTMIS.2021.10044433
• Vavilov, N. (1926). Centres of Origin of Cultivated Plants. Bulletin, Appl, Bot, Genet, Plant Breed, 161-248.
• Varshney, R.K., Thudi, M., Roorkiwal, M. Weiming, He., Upadhyaya, H.D., Yang, W., Bajaj, P. Cubry, P., Rathore, A., Jian, J., Doddamani, D., Khan, A. W., Garg, V., Chitikineni, A., Xu, D., Gaur, P.M., Singh, N.P., Chaturvedi, S.K., Nadigatla, G.V.P.R., Krishnamurthy, L., Dixit, G.P., Fikre, A., Kimurto, P. K., Sreeman, S.M., Bharadwaj, C., Tripathi, S., Wang, Jun., Lee, Suk-Ha., Edwards, D., Polavarapu, K.K.B., Penmetsa, R.V., Crossa, J., Nguyen, H.T., Siddique, K.H.M., Colmer, T.D., Sutton, T., von-Wettberg, E., Vigouroux, Y., Xu, X. and Liu, X. (2019). Resequencing of 429 chickpea accessions from 45 countries provides insights into genome diversity, domestication and agronomic traits. Nature Genetics, 51: 857-864.