Effect of tincal and borax pentahydrate additives on the physical and mechanical properties of PU foams

Öz

Polyurethane foams are widely used in the construction, automotive, home appliance, and furniture industries due to their superior properties, such as thermal, acoustic, and moisture insulation. Due to their lightweight structure, high energy absorption capacity, and low thermal conductivity, they are particularly preferred in sandwich panel systems. However, improving the physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of these materials is important for enhancing their performance. In this study, the effects of adding tincal and borax pentahydrate in varying proportions to a polyurethane matrix were investigated with the aim of improving the physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of polyurethane foams used as core materials in sandwich panels. Tincal and borax pentahydrate were separately added to polyurethane foam samples at concentrations of 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight, and the density, thermal conductivity, compressive strength, and tensile strength properties of the resulting samples were examined. In addition, the effects of additive type and ratio on the foam structure were investigated by analysing the stress-strain curves and SEM images of selected samples. According to the findings, the addition of tincal significantly reduced the density of the polyurethane foams compared to the reference sample, while the addition of borax pentahydrate maintained the density at levels closer to the reference value. In terms of thermal conductivity, the lowest value among the tincal-added samples was obtained in the sample containing 1% tincal, whereas the lowest value in the borax pentahydrate-added group was measured in the sample containing 2% borax pentahydrate. While the reference sample exhibited the highest compressive strength, among the boron-containing samples, the foams containing 2% tincal and 1% borax pentahydrate demonstrated higher performance. In terms of tensile strength, the highest result was obtained in polyurethane foams containing 2% tincal, showing a 19% increase compared to the reference value. Furthermore, it was determined that foams containing 1% borax pentahydrate provided 13.7% higher tensile strength compared to the reference sample. SEM images showed that cell size, cell distribution, and cell wall integrity changed depending on the type of boron dopant. It was concluded that, in improving the performance of polyurethane foams, the type of boron compound is as important as the additive ratio; in particular, a 2% addition of tincal stood out in terms of tensile performance, while certain boron additive ratios also contributed positively to thermal insulation performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Borax pentahydrate
• Cellular structure
• Mechanical properties
• Polyurethane foam
• Sandwich panel
• Tincal

Tinkal ve boraks pentahidrat katkılarının PU köpüklerin fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri üzerindeki etkisi

Öz

Özet Poliüretan köpükler; ısı, ses ve nem yalıtımı gibi üstün özellikleri sayesinde inşaat, otomotiv, beyaz eşya ve mobilya sektörlerinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Hafif yapısı, yüksek enerji emme kapasitesi ve düşük ısı iletkenliği nedeniyle sandviç panel sistemlerinde tercih edilmektedir. Ancak, bu malzemelerin mekanik dayanım ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açısından geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bor mineralleri, yüksek ısıl kararlılık, alev geciktiricilik ve kimyasal direnç kazandırma özellikleriyle polimer matrislerin performansını artıran çevre dostu katkı maddeleri olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, sandviç panellerin çekirdek malzemesi olarak kullanılan poliüretan köpüklerin mekanik ve fiziksel özelliklerinin geliştirilmesi amacıyla, farklı oranlarda bor minerali katkılarının etkisi incelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda, poliüretan matrisine ağırlıkça %1, %2 ve %3 oranlarında tinkal ve boraks pentahidrat ilave edilmiştir. Elde edilen numuneler üzerinde yapılan deneysel çalışmalar sonucunda, %2 tinkal katkısının poliüretan köpüğün çekme dayanımını yaklaşık %20 oranında artırdığı, buna karşılık yoğunluğunu %24 oranında azalttığı belirlenmiştir. Diğer yandan, poliüretan içerisine %1 boraks pentahidrat ilavesinin çekme dayanımında %14 artışa, yoğunlukta ise %5 azalmaya neden olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, bor türevlerinin poliüretan yapısına entegrasyonunun köpük malzemenin hafifliğini korurken mekanik dayanımını iyileştirebileceğini göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, bor mineralleriyle modifiye edilmiş poliüretan köpüklerin, yüksek performanslı ve sürdürülebilir kompozit panel uygulamaları için potansiyel taşıdığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Boraks pentahidrat
• Hücresel yapı
• Mekanik özellikler
• Poliüretan köpük
• Sandviç panel
• Tinkal

Kaynakça

1. Barikani, M., Askari, F., & Barmar, M. (2010). A comparison of the effect of different flame retardants on the compressive strength and fire behaviour of rigid PU foams. Cellular Polymers, 29(6), 343-358. https:// doi.org/10.1177/026248931002900602
2. Dolomanova, V., Rauhe, J. C. M., Jensen, L. R., Pyrz, R., & Timmons, A. B. (2011). Mechanical properties and morphology of nano-reinforced rigid PU foam. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 47(1), 81-93. https://doi. org/10.1177/0021955X10392200
3. Istrate, O. M., & Chen, B. (2011). Relative modulus-relative density relationships in low density polymer-clay nanocomposite foams. Soft Matter, 7(5), 1840- 1848. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM01052A
4. Andersons, J., Cābulis, U., Stiebra, L., Kirpļuks, M., & Spārniņš, E. (2017). Modeling the mode I fracture toughness of anisotropic low-density rigid PUR and PIR foams. International Journal of Fracture, 205, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-017-0194-2
5. Kaya, A. I. (2022). Determination of chemical structure, mechanical properties and combustion resistance of PU doped with boric acid. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 35(5), 720-739. https://doi. org/10.1177/08927057211019444
6. Bhagavathula, K. B., Meredith, C. S., Ouellet, S., Satapathy, S. S., Romanyk, D. L., & Hogan, J. D. (2022). Density, microstructure, and strain-rate effects on the compressive response of PU foams. Experimental Mechanics, 62, 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11340-021-00772-z
7. Andersons, J., Kirpluks, M., & Cabulis, U. (2020). Reinforcement efficiency of cellulose microfibers for the tensile stiffness and strength of rigid low-density PU foams. Materials, 13(12), 2725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ma13122725
8. Hamilton, A. R., Thomsen, O. T., Madaleno, L. A. O., Jensen, L. R., Rauhe, J. C. M., & Pyrz, R. (2013). Evaluation of the anisotropic mechanical properties of reinforced PU foams. Composites Science and Technology, 87, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compscitech.2013.08.013

9. Kouchaki, H. G., Aliha, M. R. M., Marsavina, L., Linul, E., Choupani, N., Mirsayar, M. M., & Berto, F. (2026). Mixed-mode tensile and in-plane shear fracture analysis for PUR foams using two sub-sized short bend beam configurations. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 141, 105282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tafmec.2025.105282
10. Kosmela, P., Hejna, A., Suchorzewski, J., Piszczyk, Ł., & Haponiuk, J. T. (2020). Study on the structure-property dependences of rigid PUR-PIR foams obtained from marine biomass-based biopolyol. Materials, 13(5), 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051257
11. Zhang, X., Ding, S., Guan, Q., Wang, Z., & Xie, H. (2025). Enhancing thermal properties, flame retardant and mechanical of multifunctional rigid PU foam modified with zinc borate and aluminum diethyl hypophosphite. Applied Thermal Engineering, 278(Part D), 127427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127427
12. Kim, S. H., Lee, M. C., Kim, H. D., Park, H. C., Jeong, H. M., Yoon, K. S., & Min, B. G. (2010). Nanoclay reinforced rigid PU foams. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 117(4), 1992-1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ app.32116
13. Nikje, M. M. A., & Tehrani, Z. M. (2010). Polyurethane rigid foams reinforced by doubly modified nanosilica. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 46(2), 159-172. https://doi. org/10.1177/0021955X09350526
14. Nallaperumal, A. M., Nikhil, P. S., Chithiraikumar, C., Santhosh Kumar, K. S., Rajeev, R. S., & Prasanth, R. (2025). Effect of NCO index on the physico-mechanical properties of poly(urethane-urea) foams using amine based polyol and non-amine based polyol. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 0(0). https://doi. org/10.1177/0021955X251403131
15. Aydoğan, B., & Usta, N. (2023). Effects of dolomite and intumescent flame retardant additions on thermal and combustion behaviors of rigid PU foams. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 140(16), e53739. https://doi. org/10.1002/app.53739
16. Aydoğan, B., Yurtseven, R., & Usta, N. (2023). Investigation of the combustion, thermal and mechanical characteristics of rigid PU foam added with talc and intumescent flame retardant. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 36(7), 2789-2814. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057221095392
17. Omotoyinbo, J. A., Oladele, I. O., Jabar, J. M., Borode, J. O., Alaneme, K. K., Akinwekomi, A. D., … & Saliu, L. O. (2021). Comparative investigation of the influence of kaolin and dolomite on the properties of polyurethane foam. Manufacturing Review, 8(27), 1-9. https://doi. org/10.1051/mfreview/2021025
18. Santiago-Calvo, M., Tirado-Mediavilla, J., Rauhe, J. C., Jensen, L. R., Ruiz-Herrero, J. L., Villafañe, F., & Rodríguez-Pérez, M. Á. (2018). Evaluation of the thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of water blown polyurethane rigid foams reinforced with carbon nanofibers. European Polymer Journal, 108, 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.08.051
19. Paciorek-Sadowska, J., Czupryński, B., & Liszkowska, J. (2015). Boron-containing fire retardant rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams: Part II - Preparation and evaluation. Journal of Fire Sciences, 33(1), 48-68. https://doi. org/10.1177/0734904114554385
20. Gürlek, G., & Altay, L. (2024). Valorization of boron derivatives in polyurethane-based foams for reduced ignitability and thermal conductivity. Journal of Boron, 9(4), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.30728/boron.1551164
21. Zarzyka, I. (2013). Effect of the boron presence on the properties of polyurethane foams obtained with hydroxypropyl derivatives of oxamide as the polyol components. e-Polymers, 13(1), 010. https://doi. org/10.1515/epoly-2013-0110
22. Acharya, S. R., Mohanty, S., & Palai, A. K. (2024). Flame retardant rigid polyurethane foam derived from biobased polyols and water as co-blowing agent: Synergistic effect of expanded graphite and boron nitride. Materials Today Communications, 41, 110278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110278
23. Sürdem, S., Yörükoğlu, A., Öztürk, S., & Yılmaz, G. (2022). Synthesis, characterization and investigation of thermal, mechanical and antibacterial properties of boric acid-incorporated polyurethane foams. Bulletin of Materials Science, 45, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12034-021-02577-1 31
24. Kırbaş, İ. (2021). Improving the structural and physical properties of boric acid-doped rigid polyurethane materials. Composites and Advanced Materials, 30, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349833211010819
25. Tanrıkulu, Y. E., & Yaşar, A. (2017). Investigation of mechanical and thermal properties of boron minerals doped plastic materials. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 32(1), 1-8.
26. Xu, D., Liu, X., Feng, J., & Hao, J. (2015). Preparation of boron-coated expandable graphite and its application in flame retardant rigid polyurethane foam. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 31, 315-320. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40242-015-4101-y
27. Iqbal, N., Mubashar, A., Ahmed, S., Arif, N., & Din, E. U. (2022). Investigating relative density effects on quasi-static response of high-density rigid PU foam (RPUF). Materials Today Communications, 31, 103320. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103320
28. Sung, G., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Influence of filler surface characteristics on morphological, physical, acoustic properties of polyurethane composite foams filled with inorganic fillers. Composites Science and Technology, 146, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compscitech.2017.04.029
29. Iaccarino, P., Sisti, P., Ferri, D., & Di Maio, E. (2025). Insights into the quasi-static mechanics of transversely isotropic polymer foams. Materials & Design, 258, 114568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114568
30. Shivakumar, N. D., & Deb, A. (2022). Dependence of the mechanical properties of rigid PU foam on density. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 41(9-10), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844211051737
31. Zarzyka, I., Pacześniak, T., & Frącz, W. (2021). Rigid PU foams modified with borate and oxamide groups: Preparation and properties. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 57(4), 471-491. https://doi. org/10.1177/0021955X20943093