A Comparative Study on the Use of Two Discrete Pre- and While-Listening Strategies

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 36 - 44, 30.05.2024

Hasan Şahin

Öz

: Listening is considered as one of the most adverse skills among ESL / EFL language skills due to distinct concerns such as the listening phases, physical conditions whilst listening, expectations from the listener and the required knowledge a listener needs to own so as to apprehend the aural input (Field, 2008). At this point, the use of L2 listening strategy use comes into prominence with the aim of lowering listening anxiety and ameliorate ESL/ EFL learners’ listening comprehension proficiency (Golchi, 2012). To this end, this research study implemented the use of two discrete pre- and while-listening strategies on EFL learners at university preparatory classes. Sixty-four EFL learners at a state university school of foreign languages in Turkey participated in this research study. The two strategies which were applied throughout the treatment were KWL (Know – Want to Know – Learn) Chart and Schema Map. The experimental stage proceeded within 10 listening sessions by means of these related listening strategies. Data was collected qualitatively through learners’ pre- and post-reflections in order to discover learners’ perceptions with regard to each while-listening strategy in the written form. Findings from both group of participants reveal their perceptions, difficulties, ways to survive and be better listeners whilst listening stage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Listening, Strategy, Schema, Perceptions

Kaynakça

• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
• Field, J. (2010). Listening in the language classroom. ELT journal, 64(3), 331-333.
• Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
• Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 115.
• Hong, H. S. (2018). The Effects of Listening Comprehension on ESL Learners' English Language Proficiency. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 15(2).
• Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2006). Towards acquiring communicative competence through listening. Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills, 29-46.
• McKenzie, N. J., & Clark, A. J. (1995). The all-in-one concept: How much must listening research include?. International Journal of Listening, 9(1), 29-43.
• Murphy, J. M. (1985). An Investigation into the Listening Strategies of ESL College Students.
• Nowrouzi, S., Tam, S. S., Zareian, G., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2015). Iranian EFL students’ listening comprehension problems. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 263-269.
• Ogle, D., & Beers, J. W. (2011). Engaging in the language arts: Exploring the power of language. Pearson Higher Ed. Rajaei, Z. (2015). The role of pre-listening activities on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(10), 35-43.
• Rubin, J. (1990). Improving foreign language listening comprehension. Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, 309-316.
• Tsui, A. B., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 432-451.
• Van Dozer, C. (1997). Improving ESL learners’ listening skills: At the workplace and beyond. Center for Applied Linguistics.
• Xu, F. (2011). Anxiety in EFL listening comprehension. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 1(12).
• Yagang, F. (1993, January). Listening: Problems and solutions. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 16-19)