Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion

- , 01.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.531947

Öz

Aim: The
aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the patients who were
referred to the urology clinic with genital skin lesions and evaluated by
dermatology.



Materaials and Methods: Forty-four
male patients over 18 years of age who were applied to urology clinic in the
last 4 months with a skin lesion in the genital area and who were evaluated by
the department of dermatology were included. Patients who applied to the
urology clinic with a skin lesion in the genital area were first evaluated by a
urologist. These patients were then directed to the dermatology polyclinic and
evaluated by a dermatologist.



Results: A
total of 44 male patients between 19 and 60 years of age were included in the
study. The mean age of the patients was 36.97 ± 12.17. In the inflammatory
diseases category, contact dermatitis was found in 11 (25%) patients, lichen
simplex chronicus in 2 (4.5%) patients, fix drug eruption in 2 (4.5%) patients,
psoriasis in 2 (4.5% , 3) lichen planus in 1 (%2,3) patient, and lichen
sclerosus in 1 (2,3%) patient had. In the infectious diseases category, 17
(38.6%) patients had condyloma acuminata, 3 (6.8%) patients had herpes simplex
infection and 1 (2.3%) patient had molluscum contagiosum. In the other diseases
category, angiokeratom in 2 (4.5%) patients, vitiligo in 1 (2,3%) patient and
calcinosis cutis in 1 (2,3%) patient were present.



Conclusion: A
multidisciplinary approach is needed in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases
in the genital region.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Buechner SA. Common skin disorders of the penis. BJU Int. 2002;90:498-506.
  • 2. Goldman BD. Common dermatoses of the male genitalia. Recognition of differences in genital rashes and lesions is essential and attainable. Postgrad Med. 2000;108:89-91, 95-6.
  • 3. David N, Tang A. Efficacy and safety of penile biopsy in a GUM clinic setting. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:573-6.
  • 4. Samuel M, Brady M, Tenant-Flowers M, Taylor C. Role of penile biopsy in the diagnosis of penile dermatoses. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21:371-2.
  • 5. Von Krogh G, Horenblas S. Diagnosis and clinical presentation of premalignant lesions of the penis. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2000;205:201–14.
  • 6. Dillner J, Meijer C, von Krogh G, Horenblas S. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2000;205:194–200.
  • 7. Fleischer AB Jr, Parrish CA, Glenn R, Feldman SR. Condylomata acuminata (genital warts): patient demographics and treating physicians. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:643-7.
  • 8. Severson J, Evans T, Lee P, Chan T, Arany I, Tyring S. Human papillomavirus infections. epidemiology, pathogenesis and therapy. J Cutan Med Surg 2001;5:43–60.
  • 9. Moscicki A. Genital human papillomavirus infections in children and adolescents. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2000;28:134–40.
  • 10. Fagundes LJ, Vieira EE Jr, Moysés AC, Lima FD, Morais FR, Vizinho NL. Sexually transmitted diseases in a specialized STD healthcare center: epidemiology and demographic profile from January 1999 to December 2009. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:523-9.
  • 11. You HS, Kim GW, Kim WJ, Mun JH, Song M, Kim HS, et al. Dermatoses of the Glans Penis in Korea: A 10-Year Single Center Experience. Ann Dermatol. 2016;28:40-4.
  • 12. Kilciler M, Bedir S, Erdemir F, Coban H, Erten K, Ors O et al. Condylomata acuminata of external urethral meatus causing infravesical obstruction. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39:107-9.
  • 13. Kavak A, Parlak AH, Akman RY, Yeşildağ N, Anul H, Aydoğan I, et al. An evaluation of hepatitis B, C and HIV infections in sexually transmitted diseases. Türkderm. 2002; 36: 272-5.
  • 14. Bada A, Olatunji P, Adewuyi J, Iseniyi J, Onile B: Hepatitis B surface antigenaemia in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Cent Afr J Med 1996; 42: 139-41.
  • 15. Neumayr G, Propst A, Schwaighofer H, Judmaier G, Vogel W. Lack of evidence for the heterosexual transmission of hepatitis C. Q J Med 1999; 92: 505-8.
  • 16. Bauer A. Geier J, Elsner P: Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with anogenital complaints. J Reprod Medicine 2000;45:649– 54.
  • 17. Kügler K, Brinkmeier T, Frosch PJ, Uter W: Anogenital dermatoses – allergic and irritative causative factors: analysis of IVDK data and review of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2005;12:979– 86.
  • 18. Foti C, Bonamonte D, Antelmi A, Conserva A, Angelini G. Allergic contact dermatitis to condoms: description of a clinical case and analytical review of current literature. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2004;26:481-5.
  • 19. Brown T, Yen-Moore A, Tyring S. An overview of sexually transmitted diseases. Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:511–29.
  • 20. Tyring S, Carlton S, Evans T. Herpes atypical clinical manifestations. Dermatol Clinics 1998;16:783–8.
  • 21. Andreassi L, Bilenchi R. Non-infectious inflammatory genital lesions. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:307-14.
  • 22. English I, Laws R, Keough G, Wilde J, Foley J, Elston D. Dermatoses of the glans penis and prepuce. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997;37:1–24.
  • 23. Mahboob A, Haroon TS. Drugs causing fixed eruptions: a study of 450 cases. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37:833-8.
  • 24. Yura E, Flury S. Cutaneous Lesions of the External Genitalia. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102:279-300.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Yazarlar

Abdullah Gurel 0000-0003-3112-448X

Gulhan Gurel 0000-0001-5716-8750

Emine Çölgeçen Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-9651-6068

Ünal Öztekin 0000-0001-9568-9442

Volkan Selmi 0000-0003-2605-9935

Sercan Sarı 0000-0002-0994-3799

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Gurel, A., Gurel, G., Çölgeçen, E., Öztekin, Ü., vd. (t.y.). Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.531947
AMA Gurel A, Gurel G, Çölgeçen E, Öztekin Ü, Selmi V, Sarı S. Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. doi:10.16919/bozoktip.531947
Chicago Gurel, Abdullah, Gulhan Gurel, Emine Çölgeçen, Ünal Öztekin, Volkan Selmi, ve Sercan Sarı. “Evaluation of Male Patients Who Applied to Urology Polyclinic With Genital Lesion”. Bozok Tıp Dergisit.y. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.531947.
EndNote Gurel A, Gurel G, Çölgeçen E, Öztekin Ü, Selmi V, Sarı S Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion. Bozok Tıp Dergisi
IEEE A. Gurel, G. Gurel, E. Çölgeçen, Ü. Öztekin, V. Selmi, ve S. Sarı, “Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion”, Bozok Tıp Dergisi, doi: 10.16919/bozoktip.531947.
ISNAD Gurel, Abdullah vd. “Evaluation of Male Patients Who Applied to Urology Polyclinic With Genital Lesion”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. t.y. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.531947.
JAMA Gurel A, Gurel G, Çölgeçen E, Öztekin Ü, Selmi V, Sarı S. Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. doi:10.16919/bozoktip.531947.
MLA Gurel, Abdullah vd. “Evaluation of Male Patients Who Applied to Urology Polyclinic With Genital Lesion”. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, doi:10.16919/bozoktip.531947.
Vancouver Gurel A, Gurel G, Çölgeçen E, Öztekin Ü, Selmi V, Sarı S. Evaluation of male patients who applied to urology polyclinic with genital lesion. Bozok Tıp Dergisi.
Copyright © BOZOK Üniversitesi - Tıp Fakültesi