Building Capacity for Public Understanding of Science: A Report on the Role of Science Centers

Öz

There is a growing need in the world for the proficiency in core competencies for public understanding of science. However, decision makers and public often lack access to information, knowledge and skills to engage in informed decision making regarding socio-scientific issues; besides, settings typically lack infrastructure to support such activities. This paper aims to explore and describe the critical factors and dynamics in science centers’ strategic initiative to develop capacity for the improvement of public understanding of science and its core competencies regarding national and international standard practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Science centers, public understanding of science, socio-scientific issues

Toplumun Bilim Anlayışının Geliştirilmesi: Bilim Merkezlerinin Rolü Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bilim eğitiminin en önemli amaçlarından biri olan toplumun bilim algısının geliştirilmesi ya da toplumda bilimin daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için gerekli bilgi ve becerinin artırılması dünyanın birçok ülkesinde tartışılan bir konu haline gelmiştir. Ancak alanda yapılan çalışmalar, karar mercilerinin ve toplumun bu konuda bilgi ve becerilere ulaşmada zorluklar yaşadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Özellikle toplu mu ilgilendiren bilimsel konularda (sosyo-bilimsel konular), toplumu oluşturan bireylerin karar verme becerisinin ve bu beceriyi geliştirecek eğitim altyapısının eksikliği ön plana çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bilim merkezlerinin toplumda bilim anlayışını geliştirmede ki mevcut kapasiteleri, sahip oldukları stratejik önem ile ulusal / uluslararası arenada bilim merkezlerinin bu yöndeki tarihsel süreci ve gelişimi araştırılarak örnek bir sosyo-bilimsel konu üzerinden tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilim merkezi, toplumda bilim, sosyo-bilimsel konular

Kaynakça

1. Bauer, Martin W., Allum, Nick and Miller, Steve. “What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research?” Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007): 79–
2. Brown, Bryan A., Reveles, John M. and Kelly, Gregory J. “Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning.” Science Education, 89 (2005): 779–802.
3. Environment Agency. Floods in the South West: The story of Winter 2000. (2011)
4. Exeter: South West Region Environment Agency. Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. “Müze ve Galeri Eğitimi.” Ankara Üniversitesi Çocuk Kültürü Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayınları, 4 (1999).
5. Falk, John H., Storksdieck, Marti and Dierking, Lynn D. “Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning.” Public Understanding of Science, 16 (4) (2007): 455-469.
6. Falk, John H. and Needham, Mark D. “Measuring the impact of a science center on its community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1) (2011): 1-12.
7. Falk, John H. and Dierking, Lynn D. “Lifelong science learning for adults: The role of free-choice experiences,” In Second international handbook of science education, eds. B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, C. J. McRobbie, 1063-1079. Dordrecht,
8. The Netherlands: Springer, 2012.

9. Kolstİ, Stein D. “Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues.” Science Education, (2001): 291-310.
10. Matkins, Juanita J. and Bell, Randy L. “Awakening the scientist inside: Glob- al climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course.” Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18 (2007): 137-163.
11. McManus, Paulette M. “Topics in museums and science education.” Studies in Science Education, 20 (1992): 157-182.
12. Medved, Maria I. and Oatley, Keith. “Memories and scientific literacy: remem- bering exhibits from a science centre.” International Journal of Science Educa- tion, 22 (10) (2000): 1117-1132.
13. Topcu, Mustafa, S. “Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students.” Evaluation & Research in Education (2010): 51-67.
14. Paykoç, F. “Türkiye’de Müze Eğitimi Uygulamaları: Tarihçe ve Örnekler,” Müze Eğitimi Seminerleri (I) Akdeniz Bölgesi Müzeleri, Suna-İnan Kıraç Akdeniz Me- deniyetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Kongre, Sempozyum, Seminer Dizisi:1, Yay. Haz: Prof. Dr. Bekir Onur, Antalya, 2003.
15. Persson, Per-Edvin. “The Totonto Decleration.” (May 20, 2012). http:// www.5scws.org.
16. Rennie, Leonie J. “Learning science out of school.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, eds. S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman, London: Lawrance Erlbaum Assoc., 2007.
17. Ryder, Jim. “Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy.” Studies in Science Education, 36 (2001): 1-44.
18. Sadler, Troy. “Informal reasoning regarding SSI: A critical review of research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (2004): 513-536.
19. Sadler, Troy and Zeidler, Dana. “Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (2005): 112-138.
20. Schibeci, Renato. “Reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic: Being literate in science and mathematics.” Research in Science Education, 20 (1) (1990): 324-325.
21. Schreiner, Camilla., Henrikse, Ellen K. and Hansen, Pal J. K. “Climate education: Empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges.” Studies in Science Education, (2005): 3-49.
22. Tytler, Russell. “Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education.” International Journal of Science Education, 23(8) (2001): 815-8
23. TUBITAK. “Bilim Merkezleri.” (December 5, 2012). http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/ sid/934/pid/461/cid/9420/index.htm.
24. Wigley, Tom M. L. “The climate change commitment.” (2005): 1766-1769.
25. Yu, Jui-Chen. “The National Science and Technology Museum of Taiwan.” Tech- nology and Culture, 40 (1) (2004):107-113.