Rusya'nın Güney Osetya Politikası, Neo-Self Determinasyon ve UCM’nin Rolü

Abstract

This study examines how Russia has relied on the adjudication of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in an attempt to achieve its goals. To this end, it explains that it is impossible to secure recognition of unilateral independence of South Ossetia by making reference to the principle of self-determination and other mainstream international legal standards; however, the study recalls that independence or annexation of the breakaway region South Ossetia is possible if the pattern set forth in independence of Kosovo is followed in this particular case as well.

Keywords

• South Ossetia, ICC, Russia, war crimes, genocide

RUSYA’NIN GÜNEY OSETYA POLİTİKASI, NEO-SELF DETERMİNASYON VE UCM’NİN ROLÜ

Öz

Bu çalışma, Rusya’nın Güney Kafkasya ile ilgili hedeflerini sağlama çerçevesinde bir uluslar arası hukuk kurumu olan UCM’yi nasıl kullanmak istediğini incelemektedir. Bu çerçevede self-determinasyon ile ilgili mevcut uluslararası hukuk kurallarını temel alarak Güney Osetya’nın Gürcistan’dan ayrılmasının mümkün olmadığı açıklanmakta ve ancak Kosova örneği takip edilerek bağımsızlık ya da ilhakın gerçekleştirilebileceği gösterilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güney Osetya, UCM, Rusya, savaş suçları, soykırım

Kaynakça

1. Bouwnegt, Thijs, “ICC analyses Georgian situation,” Radio Netherlands Worldwide, 20 Ağustos 2008.
2. Brown, Philip Marshal, “Self-determination in Central Europe,” American Journal of International Law, Cilt 14, No. 1 (1920).
3. Connor, Walker, “Self-determination: the new phase,” World Politics, Cilt 20, No. 1 (1967).
4. Convention on Rights and Duties of States (inter-American) (Montevideo Sözleşmesi), 49 Stat. 3097; Treaty Series 881, Montevideo, 26 Aralık 1933.
5. Çakmak, Cenap, “Violence in Georgia: whose war is this?” Today’s Zaman, 11 Ağustos 2008.
6. De Waal, Thomas, “South Ossetia: moral battle lines drawn,” Financial Times, 13 Ağustos Doğan, İlyas, “Siyasal bir ilke olarak halkların kendi geleceğini belirleme ilkesine devletler hukuku açısından bakış,” Kamu Hukuku Arşivi, Cilt 9, No. 1 (Mart 2006).
7. Eagleton, Clyde, “Self-determination in the United Nations,” American Journal of International Law, Cilt 47, No. 1 (1953).
8. Emerson, Rupert, “Self-Determation,” American Journal of International Law, Cilt 65, No. 3 (1971).

9. “ICC Prosecutor confirms situation in Georgia under analysis,” ICC-OTP-20080820-PR346 ENG, Lahey, 20 Ağustos 2008.
10. Jellinek, Georg, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Almanya: Verlag von O. Haring, 1905).
11. Keitner, Chimene I., “National self-determination in historical perspective: the legacy of the French Revolution for today’s debate,” International Studies Review, Cilt 2, No. 3 (2000): 3
12. King, Charles, “The five-day war,” Foreign Affairs, Cilt 87, No. 6 (2008): 2-11.
13. Kirgis, Frederic L., “The Degrees of self-determination in the United Nations era,” American Journal of International Law, Cilt 88, No. 2 (1994).
14. Lemerchand, Rene, “The limits of self-determination: the case of the Katanga secession,” The American Political Science Review, Cilt 56, No. 2 (1962).
15. Malanczuk, Peter, Modern Introduction to International Law (Londra: Routledge, 1997).
16. Mayall, James, “Non-intervention, self-determination and the ‘new world order” International Affairs, Cilt 67, No. 3 (1991).
17. Moiseev, Aleksei, “The Kosovo precedent and the system of international law,” International Affairs: A Russian Journal of World Politics, Diplomacy & International Relations, Cilt 54, No. 4 (2008).
18. Nanda, Ved P., “Self-Determination in international law: the tragic tale of two cities— Islamabad (West Pakistan) and Dacca (East Pakistan)” American Journal of International Law, Cilt 66, No. 2 (1972).
19. Özkan, Güner, “Who will stop Russia?” Turkish Daily News, 13 Ağustos 2008.
20. Riegl, Martin, “Why Kosovo is not entitled to international recognition,” The New Presence, (Yaz 2000).
21. “Russia brings case on genocide in South Ossetia,” Caucasian Knot News, 14 Ağustos 2008.
22. “Russia opens ‘genocide’ criminal case on South Ossetia events,” ITAR-TASS, 14 Ağustos Sestanovich, Stephen, “What has Moscow done?” Foreign Affairs, Cilt 87, No. 6 (2008): 12
23. Stack, Megan K. “Russia’s claim of Georgia genocide in South Ossetia hard to verify,” Los Angeles Times, 18 Ağustos 2008.
24. Taştekin, Fehim, “Kadehler birleşik Osetya ve Rusya için kalkıyor,” Radikal, 18 Eylül 2008.
25. “The ICC prosecutor analyzing alleged crimes in Georgia,” International Herald Tribune, 20 Ağustos 2008.
26. UAD’nin Namibya kararı: ICJ judgment in the Namibia-Case, ICJ Rep. 1971, 16, 31.
27. Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Roma Statüsü (Roma Statüsü), 2187, U.N.T.S. 90, 1 Temmuz
28. US assails Russian ‘escalation’ of crisis,” Washington Post, 10 Ağustos 2008.
29. Van Dyke, Vernon, “Self-determination and minority rights,” International Studies Quarterly, Cilt 13, No. 3 (1969).
30. Zimmermann, Dominik, “Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia,” International Law Observer, 26 Ağustos 2008.
31. Zyberi, Gentian, “Provisional measures indicated in Geogia v. Russia,” International Law Observer, 16 Ekim 2008.