Comparative Analysis of the Equations Used in Modeling Individual Lactation Curves in Anatolian Water Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 671 - 678, 15.11.2024

Oğuz Ağyar

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1503788

Abstract

In this study, the equations used in modeling the individual lactation curves of Anatolian Water Buffalo were comparatively examined and the most suitable model or models were tried to be determined. For this purpose, individuals with 8, 9 and 10 lactation records were selected among 8057 Anatolian Water Buffalo and a total of 1591 individual lactation curves were modeled. Guo-Salve, Grossman, Cappio-Borlino, Parabolic Exponential, Cobby and Le Du, Logarithmic Quadratic, Wilmink, Logarithmic Linear, Quadratic, Inverse Polynomial and Wood equations were used in the study. When comparing the models, coefficient of determination, mean squared error, Durbin-Watson autocorrelation test, the Akaike Information Criterion were considered. Among the models used in the study, the Cobby and Le Du, Wood and Logarithmic Quadratic models gave the best results, as opposed to the Guo-Salve model.

Keywords

Anatolian water buffalo, Individual lactation, Modeling, Bubalus bubalis

Ethical Statement

Yazar, derginin yazar kuralları sayfasında belirtildiği gibi derginin etik politikalarına uyulduğunu onaylar. Bu çalışma, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Muş İl Müdürlüğü onayına (onay tarihi: 20 Haziran 2023, protokol kodu: 2023/011-E-19057416-125.02.01-10312049) uygun olarak yürütülmüştür.

Supporting Institution

Bu araştırma, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından mali olarak desteklenmiştir.

Project Number

TAGEM/49MANDA2012-01 (Muş İli Halk Elinde Anadolu Mandası Islahı Projesi)

Thanks

Teknik yardımlarından dolayı Muş Anadolu Manda Yetiştiricileri Birliği'ne teşekkür ederiz. Proje (TAGEM/49MANDA2012-01) ekipleri Ahmet Özkaya ve Mustafa Şahin'e özellikle teşekkür ederiz.

References

• Ağyar O, Ertürk AS, Özkaya A, Sucak MG, Şahin Y. 2020. Estimation of mineral, trace element and fatty acid profile of Anatolian Water Buffalo milk. Bulgarian Chem Commun, 52(2): 230-236.
• Ağyar O. 2021. Effect of environmental factors on lactation milk yield and lactation period for Anatolian water buffaloes of Muş Province. 2nd International Livestock Science Congress, 29-30 October, Antalya, Türkiye, pp: 63.
• Aziz MA, Shalaby NA, El-Shafie OM, Mahdy AT, Nishida A. 2006. Comparison between the shapes of lactation curve of Egyptian buffalo milk yield estimated by the incomplete gamma function and a new model. Livestock Res Rural Devel, 18(5): 59.
• Barbosa SBP, Pereira RGA, Santoro KR, Batista AMV, Ribeira Neto AC. 2007. Lactation curve of cross-bred buffalo under two production systems in the Amazonian region of Brazil. Italian J Anim Sci, 6(2): 1075-1078.
• Bayazıt M, Şahin M, Tolun T. 2022. Modeling of in vitro Gas Production. BSJ Agri, 5(3): 260-264.
• Cankaya S, Şahin M, Abacı SH. 2014. Comparison of Wood and Cubic Spline Models for the First Lactation Curve of Jersey Cows. J Anim Plant Sci, 24(4): 1045-1049.
• Catillo G, Macciotta NPP, Carretta A, Cappio-Borlino A. 2002. Effects of age and calving season on lactation curves of milk production traits in Italian Water Buffaloes. J Dairy Sci, 85: 1298-1306.
• Gök Y, Şahin M, Yavuz E. 2021. Comparative analysis of individual lactation curve models in some cattle breeds. KSU J Agric Nat, 24(5): 1118-1125.
• Kaygısız A. 1999. Yerli mandaların laktasyon eğrisi özellikleri. Tarım Bil Derg, 5(1): 1-8.
• Orhan H, Kaygısız A. 2002. Siyah Alaca sığırlarda farklı laktasyon eğrisi modellerinin karşılaştırılması. Hayv Üret, 43(1): 94-99.
• Prasad S. 2003. Modeling of lactation curves of dairy animals. J Appl Anim Res, 24: 79-84.
• Şahin A, Ulutaş Z, Yıldırım A, Aksoy Y, Genç S. 2014. Comparison of different lactation curve models of Anatolian buffaloes. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 20(6): 847-855.
• Şahin A, Yıldırım A, Ulutaş Z, Aksoy Y. 2019. Estimation of lactation curve parameters with polinomial regression model in different aged Anatolian buffaloes. J Anim Sci Prod, 2(1): 13-20.
• Şahin M, Efe E. 2010. kübik spline regresyonların süt sığırcılığında laktasyon eğrilerinin modellenmesinde kullanımı. KSU J Nat Sci, 13(2): 17-22.
• Şahin M, Güven I, Özkan CO, Atalay AI, Tatlıyer A. 2011. Comparison of some mathematical models used in gas production technique. J Anim Vet Adv, 10(8): 2465-2469.
• Sing RP, Gopal R. 1982. Lactation curve analysis of buffaloes maintained under village conditions. Indian J Anim Sci, 52(12): 1157-1160.
• Tahtalı Y, Şahin M, Bayburt L. 2020. Comparison of different growth curve models in Romanov lambs. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 26(5): 609-615.
• Tolun T, Yavuz E, Şahin M, Gök İ. 2023. Modeling egg curves in partridges. BSJ Agri, 6(1): 21-25.
• Yalçınöz E, Şahin M. 2020. Modeling of Egg production curves in poultry. KSU J Agric Nat, 23(5): 1373-1378.
• Yavuz E, Önem AB, Kaya F, Çanga D, Şahin M. 2019. Modeling of individual growth curves in Japanese quails. BSJ Eng Sci, 2(1): 11-15.