Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Statistical Models and Evaluation Criteria Used in Poultry Farming

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 710 - 719, 15.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1532659

Abstract

This thesis study examined the statistical models and evaluation criteria used in poultry breeding, account considering live weight gain, egg weight and egg numbers. For this purpose, as an example of live weight increase; 9-week live weight gains of Ross-308 broiler line, as an example of egg weight; the average of 20-week egg weights of brown Lohmann laying hens and 9-week egg yields of Japanese quail were used as an example of the number of eggs. In modeling, for live weight gain; 10 different models for egg production; 11 different models and 8 different models for egg weight were considered. In evaluating the models; error mean squares, coefficient of determination, corrected coefficient of determination, Akaike Information Criterion, Corrected Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, Accuracy Factor, Bias Factor and Durbin-Watson autocorrelation values were taken into consideration. As a result of the study, in terms of live weight gain; The Cubic Piecewise regression model is the best in terms of egg yields; It was determined that the Modified Compartmental model and the Logistic model gave better results than the others in terms of egg weight. The worst models are in live weight gains; Brody and egg yields; It was concluded that there was a Quadratic Linear and Von Bertalanffy model for egg weight.

References

  • Anadolu Yarka. 2024. URL: https://anadoluyarka.com.tr/gezen-tavuk-yumurtasi-uretim-ciftligi-nasil-olmali (access date: June 01, 2024).
  • Ahmadu A, Kabir M, Iyiola-Tunji AO, Akinsola OM, Igbadan H. 2017. Mathematical modelling of egg production curves of shikabrown parents. Nigerian Soc Anim Prod, 44(1): 61-75.
  • Anang A, Indrijani H. 2006. Mathematical models to describe egg production in laying hens J Ilmu Ternak, 6(2): 91-95.
  • Balcıoğlu MS, Kızılkaya K, Yolcu HI, Karabağ K. 2005. Analysis of growth characteristics in short-term divergently selected Japanese quail. South African J Anim Sci, 35(2): 83-89.
  • Cason JA, Britton WM. 1988. Comparison of compartmental and Adams-Bell models of poultry egg production. Poultry Sci, 67: 213-218.
  • Cason JA, Ware GO. 1990. Analysis of flock egg production curves using generalized growth functions. Poultry Sci, 69: 1064-1069.
  • Cason JA. 1990. Comparison of linear and curvilinear decreasing terms in logistic flock egg production models. Poultry Sci, 69: 1467-1470.
  • Congleton WR, Chamberlain JRJT, Muir FV, Hawes RO. 1980. Imitations of using the incomplete Gamma function to generate egg production curves. Poultry Sci, 60: 689-691.
  • Demir O, Macit M, Çelebi Ş, Esenbuğa N, Kaya H. 2017. Yumurtacı tavuk rasyonlarına değişik oranlarda katılan humat’ın yumurta verimine etkisinin Gamma ve Mcnally modelleri ile analizi. Alınteri J Agri Sci, 32(2): 81-86.
  • Erişir Z, Yıldız N, 2000. Bronz hindilerde damızlık yaşının kuluçka sonuçlarına etkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 11(2): 87-89.
  • Faridi A, Mottaghitalab M, Rezaee F, France J. 2011. Narushin-Takma model as flexible alternatives for describing economic traits in broiler breeder flocks. Poultry Sci, 90: 507-515.
  • Gavora JS, Liljedah LE, Mcmillan LI, Ahlen K. 1982. Comparison of three mathematical models of egg production. British Poultry Sci, 23: 339-348.
  • İzgi V, Akkol S, Tekeli A. 2020. Genel doğrusal ve çok seviyeli doğrusal büyüme modelleri kullanılarak etlik piliçlerde büyümenin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tar Araş Derg, 7(2): 163-171.
  • Kaplan S, Gürcan EK. 2018. Comparison of growth curves using non-linear regression function in Japanese quail. J Appl Anim Res, 46(1): 112-117.
  • Karadavut U, Taşkın A, Genç S. 2017. Farklı renkli ışıklarla zenginleştirilmiş kafeslerde yetiştirilen Japon bıldırcınlarında büyüme eğrisi modellerinin karşılaştırılması. Revista Brasil Zootec, 46: 839-846.
  • Keskin İ, Tozluca A, Genç A. 2002. Japon bıldırcınlarında (Coturnix japonica) büyüme eğrisi parametrelerinin yanlılığı. Hayv Araş Derg, 12(1): 55-58.
  • Miyoshi S, Luc MK, Kuchida K, Mitsumoto T. 1996. Application of nonlinear models to egg production curves in chickens. Jpn Poultry Sci, 33: 178-184.
  • Narahari D, Abdul Mujeer K, Maqbool A, Asha Rajini R, Sundararasu V. 1991. Factors influencing the hatching performance of duck eggs. British Poultry Sci, 32(2): 313-318.
  • Narinç D, Üçkardeş F, Aslan E. 2014. Egg production curve analyses in poultry science. World's Poultry Sci J, 70(4): 817-828.
  • Narushin VG, Takma C. 2003. Sigmoid model for the evaluation of growth and production curves in laying hens. Biosyst Eng, 84: 343-348.
  • Porter P, Kebreab E, Kuhi HD, Lopez S, Strathe AB, France J. 2010. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Sci, 89(2): 371-378.
  • Şentürk E, Aktan S. 2020. Relationships between egg weight and albumen height in quails and investigating the validity of the presumptions that is in commonly used quality measurements under diverse conditions. J Poultry Res, 17(2): 80-86.
  • Şekeroğlu A, Tahtalı Y, Sarıca M, Gülay MŞ, Abacı HS, Duman M. 2013. Comparison of growth curves of broiler under different stocking densities by Gompertz Model. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19(4): 669-672.
  • TKYÇ, 2020. 3rd Türkiye Goose Breeding Workshop and Goose Day Event. Kafkas University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Prof. Dr. Necdet Leloğlu Conference Hall. 17 February 2020.
  • Topal M, Bölükbaşı ŞC. 2008. Comparison of nonlinear growth curve models in broiler chickens. J Appl Anim Res, 34(2): 149-152.
  • Türker İ, Narinç D, Alkan S. 2017. Yerli ve yabancı yumurtacı hibrit sürülerde yumurta ağırlığının zamana bağlı değişiminin karşılaştırılması ve modellenmesi. Akad Zir Derg, 6(2): 169-176.
  • Yalçınöz E, Şahin M. 2020. Yumurtacı tavuklarda yumurta verim eğrilerinin modellenmesi. KSÜ Tar Doğa Derg, 23(5): 1373-1378.
  • Yavuz E, Abacı SH, Erensoy K, Şahin M. 2023. Modeling of individual egg weights of Lohmann-Brown layer hens. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci, 47(3): 229-335.
  • Yavuz E, Önem AB, Kaya F, Çanga D, Şahin M. 2018. Modeling of individual growth curves in Japanese Quails. BSJ Eng Sci, 2(1): 11-15.
Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 710 - 719, 15.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1532659

Abstract

References

  • Anadolu Yarka. 2024. URL: https://anadoluyarka.com.tr/gezen-tavuk-yumurtasi-uretim-ciftligi-nasil-olmali (access date: June 01, 2024).
  • Ahmadu A, Kabir M, Iyiola-Tunji AO, Akinsola OM, Igbadan H. 2017. Mathematical modelling of egg production curves of shikabrown parents. Nigerian Soc Anim Prod, 44(1): 61-75.
  • Anang A, Indrijani H. 2006. Mathematical models to describe egg production in laying hens J Ilmu Ternak, 6(2): 91-95.
  • Balcıoğlu MS, Kızılkaya K, Yolcu HI, Karabağ K. 2005. Analysis of growth characteristics in short-term divergently selected Japanese quail. South African J Anim Sci, 35(2): 83-89.
  • Cason JA, Britton WM. 1988. Comparison of compartmental and Adams-Bell models of poultry egg production. Poultry Sci, 67: 213-218.
  • Cason JA, Ware GO. 1990. Analysis of flock egg production curves using generalized growth functions. Poultry Sci, 69: 1064-1069.
  • Cason JA. 1990. Comparison of linear and curvilinear decreasing terms in logistic flock egg production models. Poultry Sci, 69: 1467-1470.
  • Congleton WR, Chamberlain JRJT, Muir FV, Hawes RO. 1980. Imitations of using the incomplete Gamma function to generate egg production curves. Poultry Sci, 60: 689-691.
  • Demir O, Macit M, Çelebi Ş, Esenbuğa N, Kaya H. 2017. Yumurtacı tavuk rasyonlarına değişik oranlarda katılan humat’ın yumurta verimine etkisinin Gamma ve Mcnally modelleri ile analizi. Alınteri J Agri Sci, 32(2): 81-86.
  • Erişir Z, Yıldız N, 2000. Bronz hindilerde damızlık yaşının kuluçka sonuçlarına etkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 11(2): 87-89.
  • Faridi A, Mottaghitalab M, Rezaee F, France J. 2011. Narushin-Takma model as flexible alternatives for describing economic traits in broiler breeder flocks. Poultry Sci, 90: 507-515.
  • Gavora JS, Liljedah LE, Mcmillan LI, Ahlen K. 1982. Comparison of three mathematical models of egg production. British Poultry Sci, 23: 339-348.
  • İzgi V, Akkol S, Tekeli A. 2020. Genel doğrusal ve çok seviyeli doğrusal büyüme modelleri kullanılarak etlik piliçlerde büyümenin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tar Araş Derg, 7(2): 163-171.
  • Kaplan S, Gürcan EK. 2018. Comparison of growth curves using non-linear regression function in Japanese quail. J Appl Anim Res, 46(1): 112-117.
  • Karadavut U, Taşkın A, Genç S. 2017. Farklı renkli ışıklarla zenginleştirilmiş kafeslerde yetiştirilen Japon bıldırcınlarında büyüme eğrisi modellerinin karşılaştırılması. Revista Brasil Zootec, 46: 839-846.
  • Keskin İ, Tozluca A, Genç A. 2002. Japon bıldırcınlarında (Coturnix japonica) büyüme eğrisi parametrelerinin yanlılığı. Hayv Araş Derg, 12(1): 55-58.
  • Miyoshi S, Luc MK, Kuchida K, Mitsumoto T. 1996. Application of nonlinear models to egg production curves in chickens. Jpn Poultry Sci, 33: 178-184.
  • Narahari D, Abdul Mujeer K, Maqbool A, Asha Rajini R, Sundararasu V. 1991. Factors influencing the hatching performance of duck eggs. British Poultry Sci, 32(2): 313-318.
  • Narinç D, Üçkardeş F, Aslan E. 2014. Egg production curve analyses in poultry science. World's Poultry Sci J, 70(4): 817-828.
  • Narushin VG, Takma C. 2003. Sigmoid model for the evaluation of growth and production curves in laying hens. Biosyst Eng, 84: 343-348.
  • Porter P, Kebreab E, Kuhi HD, Lopez S, Strathe AB, France J. 2010. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Sci, 89(2): 371-378.
  • Şentürk E, Aktan S. 2020. Relationships between egg weight and albumen height in quails and investigating the validity of the presumptions that is in commonly used quality measurements under diverse conditions. J Poultry Res, 17(2): 80-86.
  • Şekeroğlu A, Tahtalı Y, Sarıca M, Gülay MŞ, Abacı HS, Duman M. 2013. Comparison of growth curves of broiler under different stocking densities by Gompertz Model. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19(4): 669-672.
  • TKYÇ, 2020. 3rd Türkiye Goose Breeding Workshop and Goose Day Event. Kafkas University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Prof. Dr. Necdet Leloğlu Conference Hall. 17 February 2020.
  • Topal M, Bölükbaşı ŞC. 2008. Comparison of nonlinear growth curve models in broiler chickens. J Appl Anim Res, 34(2): 149-152.
  • Türker İ, Narinç D, Alkan S. 2017. Yerli ve yabancı yumurtacı hibrit sürülerde yumurta ağırlığının zamana bağlı değişiminin karşılaştırılması ve modellenmesi. Akad Zir Derg, 6(2): 169-176.
  • Yalçınöz E, Şahin M. 2020. Yumurtacı tavuklarda yumurta verim eğrilerinin modellenmesi. KSÜ Tar Doğa Derg, 23(5): 1373-1378.
  • Yavuz E, Abacı SH, Erensoy K, Şahin M. 2023. Modeling of individual egg weights of Lohmann-Brown layer hens. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci, 47(3): 229-335.
  • Yavuz E, Önem AB, Kaya F, Çanga D, Şahin M. 2018. Modeling of individual growth curves in Japanese Quails. BSJ Eng Sci, 2(1): 11-15.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Zootechny (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Tolga Çetenak 0000-0002-2329-4553

İsmail Gök 0000-0002-0759-1187

Esra Yavuz 0000-0002-5589-297X

Mustafa Şahin 0000-0003-3622-4543

Publication Date November 15, 2024
Submission Date August 15, 2024
Acceptance Date October 27, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 7 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Çetenak, T., Gök, İ., Yavuz, E., Şahin, M. (2024). Statistical Models and Evaluation Criteria Used in Poultry Farming. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 7(6), 710-719. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1532659

                                                  24890