Neuroanatomy of Entrepreneurship and Bibliometric Analysis of Studies with Vosviewer

Yıl 2023, , 442 - 457, 15.10.2023

Abdullah Ballı

https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1346685

Öz

Entrepreneurship has been at the focus of many scientists doing research in the field of social sciences. Studies have focused on entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurial disposition and entrepreneurial behavior. Generally, empirical methods have been used in studies, but the neurophysiological, neuropsychological and psychoneuroendocrinological reasons behind the individual's entrepreneurship have been neglected. In short, genetic factors, hormones, behavioral genetic factors related to the individual's being an entrepreneur were not taken into account in the studies. However, with the use and development of neuroscience methods, tools and approaches in different fields, the opportunities offered by neuroscience in research on entrepreneurship in the field of Social Sciences have recently begun to be utilized. This has facilitated the neuroanatomical examination of entrepreneurial individuals. Entrepreneurship research focuses on the individual's family, environmental, social and educational interactions. In order for entrepreneurship to be understood in a multidimensional way, it is necessary to consider human behavior in terms of genetic transfers, hormones, behavioral genetics and the interactions of these factors with each other. For this reason, studies on the concepts of "entrepreneurship and neuroscience", "entrepreneurship and genetics", "entrepreneurship and biology" and "neuroentrepreneurship" gain importance. The aim of this study is to provide information about the neuroscience methods, tools and approaches used in entrepreneurship research, to make a detailed bibliometric analysis of the researches, to identify the trends and gaps related to the mentioned concepts and to bring them to the attention of researchers and to make suggestions about what should be done in future studies. Since a better understanding of entrepreneurial thought, intention and behavior will contribute to the development of entrepreneurship, mapping the studies in the literature in terms of the neuroanatomy of entrepreneurship and analyzing them within the scope of quantitative data makes the study unique. The study consists of five parts. In the first part of the study, studies carried out for a better understanding of entrepreneurship in terms of neurophysiology, hormones and genetics are given by making use of neuroscience methods, tools and approaches in the literature. In the second part, neuroscience tools, methods and approaches used in entrepreneurship research are explained. In the third part, the method of the research and in the fourth part, the bibliometric analysis findings are given. In the last part, the discussion and conclusion, the deficiencies identified in the field and recommendations for future studies are made. As the analysis unit, bibliometric data of different types of papers scanned in the Web of Science (WoS) database and published between 2006 and 2023 was taken as a basis. As a result of the research, 379 publications related to the words "entrepreneurship" and "neuroscience" were identified and the most studied 260 of them were neuroscience, neurology, 53 business economics and 47 mathematical computational biology. 346 publications on "entrepreneurship" and "genetics" have been identified and the most studied 146 of them are genetic inheritance, 44 are biochemistry, molecular biology and 35 are business economics. 183 publications on “entrepreneurship” and “biology” were found, 58 of which were studied the most, multidisciplinary sciences, 55 related to genetic inheritance and 44 of them related to business. Within the scope of the study, only 9 publications related to "neuroentrepreneurship", which are directly related to entrepreneurship and neuroscience, were identified in the Web of Science (WoS) database. In the last part, discussion and conclusion, what needs to be done in entrepreneurship research and suggestions are presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship and neuroscience, Entrepreneurship and genetics, Entrepreneurship and biology, Neuroentrepreneurship

Kaynakça

• Alvarez S, Barney JB. 2020. Has the concept of opportunities been fruitful in the field of entrepreneurship? Acad Manag Perspect, 34(3): 300-310.
• Anglin AH, Wolfe MT, Short JC, McKenny AF, Pidduck RJ. 2018. Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. J Business Vent, 33(6): 780-812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004.
• Bai L, Sun F, Wang W. 2022. Innovative application of artificial intelligence in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship of college students in internet colleges and universities. Comput Intel Neurosci, 2022: 3538755.
• Balconi M, Pagani S. 2015. Social hierarchies and emotions: cortical prefrontal activity, facial feedback (EMG), and cognitive performance in a dynamic interaction. Soc Neurosci, 10(2): 166-178.
• Ball R. 2018. Bibliometric methods: Basic principles and indicators. Ball R. (Ed), An introduction to bibliometrics, Chandos Publishing, London, UK, pp: 15-56.
• Barnea A, Cronqvist H, Siegel S. 2010. Nature or nurture: what determines investor behavior?. J Finan Econ, 98(3): 583-604.
• Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lee GP. 1999. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J Neurosci, 19(13): 5473-5481.
• Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. 2005. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends Cognit Sci, 9(4): 159-162.
• Bellavitis C, Filatotchev I, Kamuriwo DS, Vanacker T. 2017. “Entrepreneurial finance: New frontiers of research and practice. Venture Capital, 19(1-2): 1-16.
• Bellavitis C, Filatotchev I, Souitaris V. 2016. The impact of investment networks on venture capital firm performance: A contingency framework. British J Manag, 28: 102-119.
• Bercea MD. 2013. Anatomy of methodologies for measuring consumer behavior in neuromarketing research.URL: http://www.lcbronline.com/index_files/proceedingsemc12/12emc023.pdfE.T. (accessed date: January 09, 2023).
• Boglione C, Gisbert E, Gavaia PE, Witten P, Moren M, Fontagné S, Koumoundouros G. 2013. Skeletal anomalies in reared E uropean fish larvae and juveniles. Part 2: main typologies, occurrences and causative factors. Rev Aquaculture, 5: S121-S167.
• Bönte W, Procher VD, Urbig D. 2016. Biology and selection into entrepreneurship: The relevance of prenatal testosterone exposure. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract, 40(5): 1121-1148. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12165.
• Colosio M, Bellavitis C, Gorin AA. 2017. Human psychophysiological and genetic approaches in neuroentrepreneurship. In Handbook of Research Methodologies and Design in Neuroentrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., London, UK, pp: 54-93.
• de Holan PM. 2014. It’s all in your head: Why we need neuroentrepreneurship. J Manag Inquiry, 23(1): 93-97.
• Egana-delSol P, Sun X, Sajda P. 2023. Neurophysiological markers of emotion regulation predict efficacy of entrepreneurship education. Scient Rep, 13(1): 7206.
• Greene FJ, Han L, Martin S, Zhang S, Wittert G. 2014. Testosterone is associated with self-employment among Australian men. Econ Human Biol, 13: 76-84.
• Hatak I, Zhou H. 2019. Health as human capital in entrepreneurship: Individual, extension, and substitution effects on entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract, 127(1): 104225871986755.
• Hüsser A, Wirth W. 2014. Do investors show an attentional bias toward past performance? An eye-tracking experiment on visual attention to mutual fund disclosures in simplified fund prospectuses. J Financ Serv Mark, 19: 169-185.
• Ioannides AA, Liu L, Theofilou D, Dammers J, Burne T, Ambler T, Rose S. 2000. Real time processing of affective and cognitive stimuli in the human brain extracted from MEG signals. Brain Topography, 13(1): 11-16.
• Krueger N, Welpe I. 2014. Neuroentrepreneurship: what can entrepreneurship learn from neuroscience?” in Michael H. Morris (ed), Annals of Entrepreneurship: Education and Pedagogy. United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Washington, US.
• Kruschke JK, Aguinis H, Joo H. 2012. The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizat Res Methods, 15(4): 722-752.
• Künecke J, Hildebrandt A, Recio G, Sommer W, Wilhelm O. 2014. Facial EMG responses to emotional expressions are related to emotion perception ability. PloS One, 9(1): e84053.
• Lahti T, Halko ML, Karagozoglu N, Wincent J. 2019. Why and how do founding entrepreneurs bond with their ventures? Neural correlates of entrepreneurial and parental bonding. J Business Vent, 34(2): 368-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.05.001
• Laureiro-Martínez D, Venkatraman V, Cappa S, Zollo M, Brusoni S. 2015. Cognitive neurosciences and strategic management: Challenges and opportunities in tying the knot. Cognit Strat, 32: 351-370.
• Lawrence A, Clark L, Labuzetta JN, Sahakian B, Vyakarnum S. 2008. The innovative brain. Nature, 456(7219): 168-169.
• Lerner DA, Hunt RA, Verheul I. 2018. Dueling banjos: Harmony and discord between ADHD and entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Perspect, 32(2): 266-286. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2016.0178.
• Lindquist MJ, Sol J, Van Praag M. 2015. Why do entrepreneurial parents have entrepreneurial children?. J Labor Econ, 33(2): 269-296.
• Lo AW, Repin Dmitry D. 2002. The psychophysiology of real-time financial risk processing. J Cognit Neurosci, 8508: 323-339.
• Logan J. 2009. Dyslexic entrepreneurs: The incidence; their coping strategies and their business skills. Dyslexia, 15(4): 328-346.
• Mehta PH, Prasad S. 2015. The dual-hormone hypothesis: a brief review and future research agenda. Curr Opin Behav Sci, 3: 163-168.
• Moore CB, McIntyre NH, Lanivich SE. 2021. ADHD-related neurodiversity and the entrepreneurial mindset. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract, 45(1): 64-91.
• Morin C. 2011. Neuromarketing. New Sci Consumer Behav, 48(2): 131-135.
• Muda R, Kicia M, Michalak-Wojnowska M, Ginszt M, Filip A, Gawda P, Majcher P. 2018. The dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) and financial risk-taking: Stimulating and instrumental risk-taking propensity and motivation to engage in investment activity. Front Behav Neurosci, 12: 34. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00034.
• Nicolaou N, Patel PC, Wolfe MT. 2018. Testosterone and tendency to engage in self-employment. Manag Sci, 64(4): 1825-1841. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2664.
• Nicolaou N, Phan PH, Stephan U. 2021. The biological perspective in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract, 45(1): 3-17.
• Nicolaou N, Shane S, Adi G, Mangino M, Harris J. 2011. A polymorphism associated with entrepreneurship: evidence from dopamine receptor candidate genes. Small Busin Econ, 36(2): 151-155.
• Nicolaou N, Shane S, Cherkas L, Hunkin J, Spector TO. 2008. Is the tendency to engage in entrepreneurship genetic?. Manag Sci, 54(1): 167-179.
• Nicolaou N, Shane S, Cherkas L, Spector TD. 2009. Opportunity recognition and the tendency to be an entrepreneur: a bivariate genetics perspective. Organiz Behav Human Decis Proces, 110(2): 108-117.
• Nicolaou N, Shane S. 2010. Entrepreneurship and occupational choice: genetic and environmental influences. J Econ Behav Organizat, 76(1): 3-14.
• Nofal AM, Nicolaou N, Symeonidou N, Shane S. 2018. Biology and management: A review, critique, and research agenda. J Manag, 44(1): 7-31. DOI: 10.1177/0149206317720723.
• Plomin R, DeFries JC, Knopik VS, Neiderhiser JM. 2012. Behavioral genetics. Worth Publishers, New York, US, pp: 74.
• Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGuffin P. 2001. Behavioral genetics (4th ed). Worth Publishers, Worth Publishers, New York, US, pp: 127.
• Pouladi MA, Morton AJ, Hayden MR. 2013. Choosing an animal model for the study of Huntington's disease. Nature Rev Neurosci, 14(10): 708-721.
• Shane S, Drover W, Clingingsmith D, Cerf M. 2019. Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study. J Busin Ventur, 35(4): 105949.
• Shane S, Nicolaou N, Cherkas L, Spector TD. 2010. Genetics, the big five, and the tendency to be self-employed. J Appl Psychol, 95(6): 1154-1162. DOI: 10.1037/a0020294.
• Shane S, Nicolaou N, Cherkas L, Spector TD. 2010a. Do openness to experience and recognizing opportunities have the same genetic source? Human Resour Manag, 49(2): 291-303. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20343.
• Shane S, Nicolaou N. 2015b. Creative personality, opportunity recognition and the tendency to start businesses: A study of their genetic predispositions. J Busin Ventur, 30(3): 407-419.
• Sharma GD, Paul J, Srivastava M, Yadav A, Mendy J, Sarker T, Bansal S. 2021. Neuroentrepreneurship: an integrative review and research agenda. Entrepren Regional Devel, 33(9-10): 863-893.
• Simeon D, Yehuda R, Cunill R, Knutelska M, Putnam FW, Smith LM. 2007. Factors associated with resilience in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinol, 32(8-10): 1149-52.
• Songur A. 2022. Aşkın nöroanatomisi. LabMedia Mag, 13(77): 26-27.
• Studer B, Pedroni A, Rieskamp J. 2013. Predicting risk-taking behavior from prefrontal resting-state activity and personality. PloS One, 8(10): e76861.
• Tallon-Baudry C, Meyniel F, Bourgeois-Gironde S. 2011. Fast and automatic activation of an abstract representation of money in the human ventral visual pathway. PloS One, 6(11): e28229.
• Unger JM, Rauch A, Weis SE, Frese M. 2015. Biology (prenatal testosterone), psychology (achievement need) and entrepreneurial impact. J Busin Ventur Insights, 4: 1-5.
• van der Loos MJHM, Koellinger PD, Groenen PJF, Rietveld CA, Rivadeneira F, van Rooij FJA, Thurik AR. 2011. Candidate gene studies and the quest for the entrepreneurial gene. Small Busin Econ, 37(3): 269-275.
• van der Loos MJHM, Rietveld CA, Eklund N, Koellinger PD, Rivadeneira F, Abecasis GR, Ankra-Badu GA, Baumeister SE, Benjamin DJ, Biffar R, Blankenberg S, Boomsma DI, Cesarini D, Cucca F, de Geus EJC, Dedoussis G, Deloukas P, Dimitriou M, Eiriksdottir G, Thurik AR. 2013. The molecular genetic architecture of self-employment. PLoS ONE, 8(4): e60542.
• Venkataraman S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. JAI Press, 3: 119-138.
• Vieito JP, da Rocha AF, Rocha FT. 2015. Brain activity of the investor’s stock market financial decision. J Behav Finan, 16(3): 220-230.
• Weinberger E, Wach D, Stephan U, Wegge J. 2018. Having a creative day: Understanding entrepreneurs’ daily idea generation through a recovery lens. J Busin Ventur, 33(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.001.
• White RE, Thornhill S, Hampson E. 2006. Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organizat Behav Human Decis Proces, 100(1): 21-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.001.
• White RE, Thornhill S, Hampson E. 2007. A biosocial model of entrepreneurship: The combined effects of nurture and nature. J Organiz Behav, 28(4): 451-466.
• Wiklund J, Patzelt H, Dimov D. 2016. Entrepreneurship and psychological disorders: How ADHD can be productively harnessed. J Busin Ventur Insights, 6: 14-20.
• Wiklund J, Yu W, Tucker R, Marino LD. 2017. ADHD, Impulsivity and Entrepreneurship. J Busin Ventur, 32(6): 627-656.
• Wolfe MT, Patel PC. 2017. Two are better than one: Cortisol as a contingency in the association between epinephrine and self-employment. J Busin Ventur Insights, 8: 78-86.
• Wolfe MT, Patel PC. 2018. Racing to get self-employed? Life history models and self-employment. J Busin Ventur Insights, 10: e00093.
• Yıldırım BO, Derksen JJ. 2012. A review on the relationship between testosterone and life-course persistent antisocial behavior. Psychiatry Res, 200(2-3): 984-1010.
• Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ, Narayanan J, Arvey RD, Chaturvedi S, Avolio BJ, Larsson G. 2009. The genetic basis of entrepreneurship: effects of gender and personality. Organizat Behav Human Decis Proces, 110(2): 93-107.
• Zunino D. 2016. Are genetics and environment substitutes or complements in affecting entrepreneurial choice? Acad Manag Proceed, 2016(1): 12173. DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.12173abstract.