Compressive Strength Analysis of Additively Manufactured Zirconia Honeycomb Sandwich Ceramic Parts with Different Cellular Structures

Öz

In this study, ZrO2 honeycomb sandwich structures with different cellular geometry were manufactured by SLA 3D-printing technology to analyze the compressive strength behaviour. After the printing procedure, the samples were sintered at 1450 °C for 2h. Among the samples with different cellular geometry, ZrO2 parts with circular cells were superior to that of square and triangular honeycomb structures and 1867±320 MPa compressive strength was obtained for this structure. The stress distributions in honeycomb structures were investigated using the COMSOL Multiphysics® for exposing the effect of cellular geometry on compressive strength. While more uniform stress distributions were seen on the inner wall of the circular honeycomb sample, the cellular structure of the square and triangle honeycomb samples mostly displayed compressive stress concentration on the joints of the honeycomb structure. Also, according to Rankine failure criterion, the parts with square cellular geometries were found to be more prone to failure. The highest specific compressive strength was obtained for the ZrO2 parts with circular cellular geometry. These findings demonstrated that the ZrO2 honeycomb sandwich structures with circular cellular geometry produced using SLA ceramic 3D-printing technology may be a suitable material to utilize in lightweight structural designs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ZrO2
• SLA
• Honeycomb sandwich
• Compressive strength

Kaynakça

1. Buchanan C, Gardner L. 2019. Metal 3D printing in construction: A review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges. Eng Struct, 180: 332-348.
2. Chang J, Zou B, Wang X, Yu Y, Chen Q, Zhang G. 2022. Preparation, characterization and coloring mechanism of 3D printed colorful ZrO2 ceramics parts. Mater Today Commun, 33: 104935.
3. Chen J, Su R, Zhai X, Wang Y, Gao X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu S, He R. 2023. Improving the accuracy of stereolithography 3D printed Al2O3 microcomponents by adding photoabsorber: Fundamentals and experiments. JMR&T, 27: 757-766.
4. Chen Z, Li Z, Li J, Liu C, Lao C, Fu Y, Liu C, Li Y, Wang P, He Y. 2019. 3D printing of ceramics: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc, 39: 661-687.
5. Fabris D, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Pinto P, Souza JCM, Fredel MC, Silvab FS, Henriques B. 2019. Mechanical properties of zirconia periodic open cellular structures, Ceram Int, 45: 15799-15806.
6. Haldar AK, Zhou J, Guan Z. 2016. Energy absorbing characteristics of the composite contoured-core sandwich panels. Mater Today Commun, (8): 156-164.
7. Hu JS, Wang BL. 2021. Crack growth behavior and thermal shock resistance of ceramic sandwich structures with an auxetic honeycomb core. Compos Struct, 260: 113256.
8. Huang Z, Liu LY, Yuan J, Guo H, Wang H, Ye P, Du Z, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Gan CL. 2023. Stereolithography 3D printing of Si3N4 cellular ceramics with ultrahigh strength by using highly viscous paste. Ceram Int, 49: 6984-6995.

9. Kafkaslıoğlu Yıldız B, Yıldız AS, Kul M, Tür YK, Işık E, Duran C, Yılmaz H. 2024. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed Al2O3 honeycomb sandwich structures prepared using the SLA method with different core geometries. Ceram Int, 50: 2901-2908.
10. Lu J, Dong P, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zeng Y. 2021. 3D printing of TPMS structural ZnO ceramics with good mechanical properties. Ceram Int, 47: 12897-12905.
11. Mamatha S, Biswas P, Das D, Johnson R. 2020. 3D printing of cordierite honeycomb structures and evaluation of compressive strength under quasi‐static condition. Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 17: 211-216.
12. Manicone PF, Iommetti PR, Raffaelli L. 2007. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent, 35(11): 819-826.
13. Mei H, Tan Y, Huang W, Chang P, Fan Y, Cheng L. 2021. Structure design influencing the mechanical performance of 3D printing porous ceramics. Ceram Int, 47: 8389-8397.
14. Qi C, Jiang F, Yang S. 2021. Advanced honeycomb designs for improving mechanical properties:A review, Compos B Eng, 227: 109393.
15. Schwentenwein M, Schneider P, Homa J. 2014. Lithography-based ceramic manufacturing: a novel technique for additive manufacturing of high-performance ceramics. Adv Sci Technol, 88: 60-64.
16. Shen M, Qin W, Xing B, Zhao W, Gao S, Sun Y, Jiao T, Zhao Z. 2021. Mechanical properties of 3D printed ceramic cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures. J Eur Ceram Soc, 41: 1481-1489.
17. Shirvani SMN, Gholami M, Afrasiab H, Talookolaei RAJ. 2023. Optimal design of a composite sandwich panel with a hexagonal honeycomb core for aerospace applications. Iranian J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng, 47: 557-568.
18. Srikanth O, Khivsara SD, Aswathi R, Madhusoodana CD, Das RN, Dutta VSP. 2017. Numerical and experimental evaluation of ceramic honeycombs for thermal energy storage. Trans Ind Ceram Soc, 76(2): 102-107.
19. Wang L, Yao L, Tang W, Dou R. 2023. Effect of Fe2O3 doping on color and mechanical properties of dental 3Y-TZP ceramics fabricated by stereolithography-based additive manufacturing. Ceram Int, 49: 12105-12115.
20. Wang Z, Lia Z, Xiong W. 2019. Numerical study on three-point bending behavior of honeycomb sandwich with ceramic tile, Compos B Eng, 167: 63-70.
21. Xu H, Li S, Liu R, Bao C, Mu M, Wang K. 2023. Fabrication of alumina ceramics with high flexural strength using stereolithography. IJAMT, 128: 2983-2994.
22. Xue D, He L, Tan S, Li Y, Xue P, Yang X. 2022. Study on compression characteristics of honeycomb sandwich structure with multistage carbon fiber reinforced composites. Polym Compos, 43: 6252-6264.
23. Yu X, Wang Z, Wang Y, Yu Z, Zhao Y, Zhao J. 2023. Optimization, formation, and evolution of the photoinduced curing gradients and in-situ lamellar gaps in additive manufacturing of ZrO2 ceramics: From curing to sintering behaviors. J Eur Ceram Soc, 43: 6279-6295.
24. Zhang Q, Yang X, Li P, Huang G, Feng S, Shen C, Han B, Zhang X, Jin F, Xu F, Lu TJ. 2015. Bioinspired engineering of honeycomb structure – Using nature to inspire human innovation. Prog Mater Sci, 74: 332-400.
25. Zhou LY, Fu J, He Y. 2020. A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater, 30(28): 2000187.