Parametric Optimization of Structural Frame Design for High Payload Hexacopter

Öz

For drones, the use of which has been increasing recently for load carrying, lightweight drone frame design is significant for increased flight time and payload capacity. Drones are produced in different configurations with three, four, or six rotors, and in different sizes depending on the purpose of use. While agility is more important in three and four rotor drone applications, six-rotor and relatively large-bodied drones are preferred in cases such as load carrying. When the body structure has to be large, lightening the design becomes very critical. Lightweight designs can be achieved by two commonly used methods for structural optimization: topology optimization and parametric optimization. Topology optimization is an advanced method that can significantly reduce weight but is expensive and time-consuming. Parametric optimization is a more practical approach to conventional manufacturing methods and was used in this study. This study aims to first simplify the hexacopter frame model and define key geometric parameters for mass-decreasing optimization. Finite element analysis simulations were used to evaluate the strength and deformation of the frame under various design scenarios. The results showed that parametric optimization successfully reduced the weight of the hexacopter frame while maintaining structural integrity. The maximum Von Mises stress was found as approximately one quarter of the yield strength of the frame material. The maximum total deformation was achieved below 0.3 mm, and deformation under 1 mm is considered safe in the literature. As a result, the optimized design offers a lighter drone structure in line with conventional manufacturing methods, providing better flight time and payload capacity while maintaining cost effectiveness. In future studies, comparisons can be made based on this study by performing weight optimizations suitable for current methods such as topology optimization or generative design. The cost factor and the availability of existing production lines should be taken into consideration when comparing the mentioned methods with parametric optimization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Parametric optimization
• Hexacopter
• Drone design
• Finite element analysis

Kaynakça

1. Abdulsalam H. 2021. Mesh sensitivity assessment on 2D and 3D elastic finite element analysis on a compact tension specimen geometry using ABAQUS/CAE software. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 730(1): 012032.
2. Anweiler S, Piwowarski D. 2017. Multicopter platform prototype for environmental monitoring. J Clean Prod, 155: 204-211.
3. Aswath M, Raj SJ. 2021. Hexacopter design for carrying a payload for warehouse applications. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 1012(1): 012025.
4. Azhagan MT, Shanmugam R, Khan S, Lata S. 2023. Design optimization of hexacopter frame using generative design and additive manufacturing. ASME Int Mech Eng Cong Expo, 87608: V003T03A048.
5. Elouarouar S, Medromi H. 2022. Hexacopter drones overview. 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, March 3-4, Meknes, Morocco, pp: 1-7.
6. Fahlstrom PG, Gleason TJ, Sadraey MH. 2022. Introduction to UAV systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, US, pp: 276.
7. Hassani V, Mehrabi HA, Ibrahim Z, Ituarte IF. 2021. A Comparison between parametric structural optimization methods and software-based topology optimization of a rectangular sample under tensile load for additive manufacturing processes. Int J Appl Eng Res Appl, 11(2): 37-58.
8. Ismail KB, Rahim AHA, Zawawi F. 2020. Design and development of heavy-lift hexacopter for heavy payload. J Transp Eng, 2020: 53-63.

9. Kumar VA, Sivaguru M, Janaki BR, Eswar KS, Kiran P, Vijayanandh R. 2021. Structural optimization of frame of the multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle through computational structural analysis. J Phys Conf, 1849(1): 012004.
10. MohamedZain AO, Chua H, Yap K, Uthayasurian P, Jiehan T. 2022. Novel drone design using an optimization software with 3D model, simulation, and fabrication in drone systems research. Drones, 6(4): 97.
11. Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K. 2015. Machining performance of aluminum alloy 6061-T6 on surface finish using minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Automot Mech Eng, 11: 2699.
12. Namlu RH, Yılmaz OD, Kilic SE, Cetin B. 2019. Investigating the effect of cutting conditions on machining performance of Al 6061-T6 alloy. 10th Int. Congr. Machining, November 7-9, Antalya, Türkiye, pp: 293-304.
13. Pollet F, Delbecq S, Budinger M, Moschetta JM, Liscouët J. 2022. A common framework for the design optimization of fixed-wing, multicopter and VTOL UAV configurations. 33rd Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, September 4-9, Stockholm, Sweden, pp: 1-18.
14. Radakovic D. 2021. Bridging nature-art-engineering with generative design. In Experimental and Computational Investigations in Engineering: Proceedings of the International Conference of Experimental and Numerical Investigations and New Technologies, CNNTech 2020. Springer International Publishing, pp: 326-343.
15. Ramesh PS, Jeyan JML. 2022. Comparative analysis of fixed-wing, rotary-wing and hybrid mini unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) from the applications perspective. INCAS Bull, 14(1): 137-151.
16. Sharma P, Selvakumar A. 2018. Conceptual design and non-linear analysis of triphibian drone. Procedia Comput Sci, 133: 448-455.
17. Shelare S, Belkhode P, Nikam KC, Yelamasetti B, Gajbhiye T. 2023. A payload based detail study on design and simulation of hexacopter drone. Int J Interact Des Manuf, 2023: 1-18.
18. Sreeramoju S, Rao MS. 2023. Design and analysis of quad copter chassis using shape optimization technique. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, 11(3): 1569-1575.
19. Sundararaj S, Dharsan K, Ganeshraman J, Rajarajeswari D. 2021. Structural and modal analysis of hybrid low altitude self-sustainable surveillance drone technology frame. Mater Today Proc, 37: 409-418.
20. Țura DM, Zaharia SM. 2023. Design, additive manufacturing and testing of a quadcopter drone. Land Forces Acad, 28(3): 245-254.
21. Tyflopoulos E, Steinert M. 2020. Topology and parametric optimization-based design processes for lightweight structures. Appl Sci, 10(13): 4496.
22. Tyflopoulos E, Steinert M. 2022. A comparative study of the application of different commercial software for topology optimization. Appl Sci, 12(2): 611.
23. Urdea M. 2021. Stress and vibration analysis of a drone. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 1009(1): 012059.
24. Wu YT, Qin Z, Eizad A, Lyu SK. 2021. Numerical investigation of the mechanical component design of a hexacopter drone for real-time fine dust monitoring. J Mech Sci Technol, 35: 3101-3111.
25. Yemle S, Durgude Y, Kondhalkar G, Pol K. 2019. Design & analysis of multi-frame for octo & quad copter drones. Int Res J Eng Technol, 6(06): 2395-0056.