The Impact of Passenger Transportation on Carbon Emissions in Airports: The Case of Schiphol Airport

Öz

The management of airport-related emissions should not be limited solely to flight operations but must also encompass an assessment of the transport modes used to access the airport. The literature indicates that, in particular, road-based modes such as private cars and taxis account for a significant share of total emissions,and that these emissions are predominantly classified among indirect sources. In this study, the impact of road transport on carbon emissions in airport access was evaluated, and the distribution of emissions generated by different access modes was analysed using the case of Amsterdam Schiphol Airport. Although rail systems are extensively used among access modes, it was determined that private cars account for a substantial share of total access-related emissions. The findings reveal that airport managements should develop strategies targeting access modes. Practices that influence passenger behaviour, real-time data access, rail system integration, expansion of public transport infrastructure, parking management, and incentives for low-emission vehicles are considered managerial tools that can be utilised in reducing access-based emissions. The measurement and management of access-related emissions should be regarded as a fundamental component in achieving airports’ sustainability objectives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Airport management
• Road transportation
• Rail Transport
• Carbon emissions
• Sustainable transportation

Havalimanlarında Yolcu Taşımacılığının Karbon Emisyonlarına Etkisi: Schiphol Havalimanı Örneği

Öz

Havalimanı kaynaklı emisyonların yönetimi, yalnızca uçuş operasyonlarıyla sınırlı kalmayıp havalimanına erişimde kullanılan ulaşım modlarının da değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmaktadır. Literatürde, özellikle özel otomobil ve taksi gibi karayolu modlarının, toplam emisyonların anlamlı bir bölümünü oluşturduğu ve bu emisyonların çoğunlukla dolaylı kaynaklar arasında sınıflandırıldığı ifade edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, havalimanına erişimde karayolu taşımacılığının, karbon emisyonlarına etkisi değerlendirilmiş ve Amsterdam Schiphol Havalimanı örneği üzerinden erişim modlarının, emisyon üretimi üzerindeki dağılımı analiz edilmiştir. Erişim modları içerisinde raylı sistemlerin yoğun olarak kullanıldığı, buna rağmen toplam erişim emisyonlarının büyük bir bölümünden özel otomobillerin sorumlu olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, havalimanı yönetimlerinin erişim modlarına yönelik stratejiler geliştirmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Yolcu davranışlarını yönlendiren uygulamalar, gerçek zamanlı veri erişimi, raylı sistem entegrasyonu, toplu taşıma altyapısının genişletilmesi, park yönetimi, düşük emisyonlu araçlara yönelik teşvikler, erişim temelli emisyonların azaltımında kullanılabilecek yönetsel araçlar olarak görülmektedir. Erişim kaynaklı emisyonların ölçülmesi ve yönetimi, havalimanlarının sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerine ulaşmasında temel bir unsur olarak ele alınmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Havalimanı yönetimi
• Karayolu taşımacılığı
• Demiryolu taşımacılığı
• Karbon emisyonları
• Sürdürülebilir ulaşım

Kaynakça

1. Avogadro M, Colovic A, Rossi M. 2024. Assessing airport ground access interventions: An integrated simulation approach. J Air Transp Manag, 119: 102451.
2. Boersma K, Toet A. 2024. The future is multimodal. Airport World, 25 Mar 2024. https://airport-world.com/the-future-is-multimodal/ (accessed date: June 02, 2025).
3. Budd L, Ison S, Budd T. 2016. Improving the environmental performance of airport surface access in the UK: The role of public transport. Res Transp Econ, 59: 185-195.
4. Cerasi C Ç, Yaman F. 2024. Luggage management system in order to reduce carbon emissions and ensure sustainability. Darnios Aplinkos Vystymas. https://doi.org/10.52320/dav.v21i1.303
5. Dijkstra A. 2010. Mapping and reducing CO₂ emissions at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol: Developing a model to assess CO₂ reduction at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol [Master's thesis, TU Delft]. TU Delft Repository, Netherlands, pp: 56-59.
6. Gössling S, Humpe A, Sun Y-Y. 2024. Are emissions from global air transport significantly underestimated? Curr Issues Tour, 28(5): 695-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2337281
7. Greenreporting.nl. 2023. De CO2-uitstoot per vervoersmiddel: wat je moet weten. https://greenreporting.nl/co2-uitstoot-per-vervoersmiddel/ (accessed date: June 01, 2025)
8. Greer F, Rakas J, Horvath A. 2020. Airports and environmental sustainability: A comprehensive review. Environ Res Lett, 15(10): 103007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb42a

9. Hájnik A, Harantová V, Kalašová A. 2021. Use of electromobility and autonomous vehicles at airports in Europe and worldwide. Transp Res Procedia, 55: 71-78.
10. Hernández-Martín R, Padrón-Ávila H. 2021. The carbon footprint of airport ground access as part of an outbound holiday trip. Sustainability, 13(16): 9085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169085
11. Higgins TJ. 1994. California Airports: Ground Access Vehicle Trips, Emissions And Emission Reduction Strategies. Aviation Crossroads, California, USA, pp: 54-96.
12. Ison S, Merkert R, Mulley C. 2014. Policy approaches to public transport at airports—Some diverging evidence from the UK and Australia. Transp Policy, 35(C): 265-274.
13. Li DC, Merkert R. 2023. “Door-to-door” carbon emission calculation for airlines–Its decarbonization potential and impact. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ, 121: 103849.
14. Liu K. 2024. Comprehensive Analysis of Taxi Service Distribution, Demand Hot spots, and Air Pollution Impact: A GIS and Big Data Approach. Appl Comput Eng, 110: 188-194.
15. London Gatwick Airport. 2021. Decade of Change Performance Summary. Gatwick Airport Ltd, Crawley, UK, pp: 56-75.
16. London Heathrow Airport. 2022. ULEZ consultation summary report. Heathrow Airport Ltd., London, UK, pp: 26-63.
17. Mahesh R, Calvert SC. 2025. Decarbonizing airport ground access: A framework of user behavior, infrastructure, and policy. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ, In press, pp: 54-55.
18. Matheys J, Van Autenboer W, Timmermans H. 2009. Improvement of the CO₂ balance of the landside accessibility of Brussels Airport through implementation of electric vehicles and general policy measures. J Asian Electr Veh, 7(1): 1265-1271.
19. Meindl M, De Ruiter C, Marciello V, Di Stasio M, Saavedra Rubio K, Laurent A, Ruocco M, Maerz M. 2024. Greening Regional Airports: A Vision for Carbon Neutral Infrastructure. In: RY Qassim (Ed.), Contemporary Perspective on Sci, Technol and Res, 3:: 165-201. B P International. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpstr/v3/1423G
20. Milieu Centraal. 2020. CO2-uitstoot fiets, ov en auto. (Bisiklet, toplu taşıma ve araba CO2 karşılaştırması), Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 45-46.
21. Miyoshi C, Mason KJ. 2013. The damage cost of carbon dioxide emissions produced by passengers on airport surface access: The case of Manchester Airport. J Transp Geogr, 28: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.003
22. Morch A, Laveneziana L, Erga I, Foss M, Wolden HK, Hennig M. 2024. Electrification of airports and air transport: Airports becoming integrated energy systems. Proc 21st Int Conf European Energy Market (EEM). https://doi.org/10.1109/eem60825.2024.10608967
23. Nijen N. 2024. Explaining Access Mode Choice for Passengers and Personnel travelling to Schiphol Airport. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Univ Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, pp: 54-65.
24. NS Annual Report. 2022. https://2022.nsannualreport.nl/annual-report-2021/our-activities-and-achievements-in-the-netherlands/performance-on-sustainability (accessed date: June 12, 2025)
25. Pasha MM, Hickman M. 2016. Airport ground accessibility: Review and assessment. 38th Australasian Transp Res Forum (ATRF), pp: 1-12.
26. Postorino MN, Mantecchini L. 2014. A transport carbon footprint methodology to assess airport carbon emissions. J Air Transp Manag, 37: 76-86.
27. Qiao B, He J, Yan X, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhang J. 2021. Assessing emission reduction effects from shifts of urban passenger transport modes by implementing targeted emission tax considering the whole fuel cycle. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 28(9): 11758-11775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14226-5
28. Risby J, Guest S, Warnock-Smith D. 2022. A critical analysis of Bristol Airport’s ground access strategy in a post-COVID context. Case Stud Transp Policy, 10(4): 2161-2170.
29. Rome2Rio. 2023. Amsterdam Airport to Rotterdam – Distance and travel options. https://www.rome2rio.com/map/Amsterdam-Airport-Schiphol/Rotterdam (accessed date: May 15, 2025)
30. Royal Schiphol Group. 2025. 2024 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu (Yolcu ve Ulaşım İstatistikleri). Amsterdam: Schiphol Group, Amsterdam, Netherlans, pp: 24-26.
31. Ryley T, Burchell J, Davison L. 2013. Valuing air transportation and sustainability from a public perspective: Evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States. Res Transp Bus Manag, 7: 114-119.
32. Schneider A, Stern C, Sachdeva N, Dar Z. 2024. Can airports be a catalyst for reducing aviation’s effect on the climate? One Earth, 7(6): 695-709. https://doi.org/10.69554/oibc8419
33. Shao M, Chen C, Lu Q, Zuo X, Liu X, Gu X. 2023. The Impacts of Low-Carbon Incentives and Carbon-Reduction Awareness on Airport Ground Access Mode Choice under Travel Time Uncertainty: A Hybrid CPT-MNL Model. Sustainability, 15(16): 12610.
34. Smirti M. 2008. Modeling and measuring greenhouse gas reduction from low carbon airport access modes [Research report]. Research Papers in Economics.
35. Sperling J, Henao A. 2020. Electrification of high-mileage mobility services in cities and at airports. Intell and Eff Transp Syst, 65: 1-15.
36. Statista. 2023. Choice of transport to and from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol 2015–2019. Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/statistics/688080/choice-of-transport-to-and-from amsterdam-airport-schiphol-the-netherlands/ (accessed date: March 13, 2025)
37. Statista. 2024. Number of passengers utilizing Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (2024). https://www.statista.com/statistics/652766/number-of-passengers-utilizing-amsterdam-airport-schiphol/ (accessed date: May 08, 2025)
38. Sun M, Xue C, Cheng Y, Zhao L, Long Z. 2021. Analyzing spatiotemporal daily travel source carbon emissions based on taxi trajectory data. IEEE Access, 9: 107012-107023.
39. Thomas H, Serrenho A. 2024. Using different transport modes: An opportunity to reduce UK passenger transport emissions? https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.104214
40. Travelmath. 2023. Driving distance from AMS to Amersfoort, NL. https://www.travelmath.com (accessed date:June 24, 2025)
41. Yılmaz O, Frost M, Timmis A, Ison S. 2023. Investigation of employee-related airport ground access emissions. Transp Res Procedia, 64: 350-359.
42. Zhang Z, Peng ZR, He HD, Yang JM, Gao K, Jia R. 2024. Environmental impacts of ridesplitting considering modal substitution and associations with built environment. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ, 130: 104160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104160
43. Zhang Z, Gao K, He HD, Yang JM, Jia R, Peng ZR. 2023. How do travel characteristics of ridesplitting affect its benefits in emission reduction? Evidence from Chengdu. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ, 123: 103912.