An Investigation of Mathematics Education Studies Conducted with Turkish Primary Teachers

Yıl 2024, , 436 - 452, 16.04.2024

Duygu Ören Vural , Sevim Sevgi

https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1206364

Öz

The studies conducted with in-service and preservice primary teachers in the field of mathematics teaching are among the research areas that are important and will not lose their importance soon as the outcomes of these research areas are critical for teaching mathematics in primary education and restructuring teacher education programs. As the number of studies in this field conducted in recent years increases, the necessity of reference research that will guide future studies and evaluate the status of current ones comes to the front. Using the method of systematic reviewing, research studies on mathematics education, which are published in the journals indexed in ULAKBİM, conducted between 2010-2021 years, and conducted with in-service and preservice primary teachers in Turkey, were examined. A total of 100 research studies were analyzed by using content analysis. All the studies were examined focusing on their research area, learning area, research method, data collection tools, sample and sample size, and data analysis methods. This study aimed to reveal the research trends in Turkey first. The secondary goal of the study is to guide future research studies by revealing what is highlighted and missing in the field. Considering research results, researchers can expand and improve research in primary mathematics education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

primary teachers, preservice primary teachers, primary education, mathematics, mathematics education

Kaynakça

• Alper, A. & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of recent research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 8(2), 124-135. http://www.tojet.net/volumes/v8i2.pdf
• Çalık, M., Ünal, S., Coştu, B., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2008). Trends in Turkish Science Education. Essay in Education, Special Education, 23-46. DOI:10.12738/estp.2013.3.1609
• Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2015). From content analysis editors. The Education and Science, 40(178), i-ii.
• Çiltaş, A., Güler, G. & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Türkiye’de matematik eğitimi araştırmaları: Bir içerik analizi çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(1), 565-580.
• Erdem, D. (2011). Türkiye’de 2005–2006 yılları arasında yayımlanan eğitim bilimleri dergilerindeki makalelerin bazı özellikler açısından incelenmesi: Betimsel bir analiz. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 2(1), 140-147. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/65981
• Erdogan, M., Usak, M., & Bahar, M. (2013). A review of research on environmental education in non-traditional settings in Turkey, 2000 and 2011. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(1), 37-57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1008594.pdf
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, W. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate educational research. (4. Edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Swars, S. L., and Smith, M. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education: 1995–2005. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771
• Kayhan, M. & Özgün-Koca, S. A. (2004). Matematik eğitiminde araştırma konuları: 2000-2002. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(26), 72-81. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/87771
• Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Yildirim, G., Arpacik, O., & Goktas, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education, 68, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.016
• Lee, M., Wu, T., and Tsai, C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876
• Lubienski, S. T. and Bowen, A. (2000). Who's counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982-1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/749890 Miles, M., and Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
• Sözbilir, M., Kutu, H., and Yaşar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon and D. Jorde (Eds). The world of science education: handbook of research in Europe (pp.341-374). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Staton-Spicer, A. Q. and Wulff, D. H. (1984). Research in communication and instruction: Categorization and synthesis. Communication Education, 33(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528409384767
• Tatar, E. and Tatar, E. (2008). Fen bilimleri ve matematik eğitimi araştırmalarının analizi I: Anahtar kelimeler. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(16), 89-103. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/92322
• Ulutaş, F. and Ubuz, B. (2008). Matematik eğitiminde araştırmalar ve eğilimler: 2000 ile 2006 yılları arası. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 614-626. http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/1751/1587