Do STEM Career Interest Levels Change Over the Years?

Abstract

Educating a new generation of engineers, mathematicians, and scientists is essential for developing a competent workforce that meets the demands of the 21st century. Given that a qualified workforce trained in STEM disciplines will shape the contemporary corporate landscape, students ought to be steered toward careers associated with these domains. The study seeks to ascertain the interests of high school pupils in STEM careers. This study employs a survey, a quantitative research design. The study sample comprised 326 ninth-grade students enrolled in a high school in Kayseri province during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 academic years. The STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS) scale gathers research data. To ascertain the overall inclinations of the participants towards STEM careers, total STEM scores associated with the scale were computed for each individual. The investigation revealed that total scores for the 2018-2019 academic year varied from 111 to 200 points, with an average of 156.09. For the 2019-2020 academic year, total scores ranged from 113 to 200, with an average of 157.77. The maximum score achievable on this scale is 5*40=200, while the minimum value is 1*40=40. The critical value of 2.60, as recognized in the literature, indicates that findings over this threshold are deemed to exhibit significant interest in STEM careers. Consequently, we ascertained that high school pupils exhibit a favorable and progressively increasing inclination towards STEM vocations, attributable to the existing education system; their interest in mathematics is the most pronounced during both academic periods. We determined that it exhibited the lowest average for the engineering factor. The findings can be augmented by researching diverse socioeconomic and geographical regions, focusing on gender, academic performance, and familial influences, and comparing the outcomes.

Keywords

• STEM Professional
• career interest
• Science education

References

1. Barry, D. M., & Kanematsu, H. (2006). International program to promote creative thinking in chemistry and science. The Chemist, 83(2), 10–14.
2. Business Europe (2011). Plugging the skills gap: The clock is ticking. Retrieved September 6, 2013 from http://www.businesseurope.eu/Content/Default.asp?pageid=568&docid=28659.
3. Buxton, C. A. (2001). Modeling science teaching on science practice? Painting a more accurate picture through an ethnographic lab study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 387–407.
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. PegemA.
5. Caglak, S. (2017). Does hands-on science practices make an impact on achievement in science? A meta-analysis. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275708
6. Çavaş, P., Ayar A. & Gürcan, G. (2020). A study on the status of research on STEM education in Turkey. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 17(1), 823–854. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.751 853
7. Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (Genişletilmiş 4. Baskı). [Introduction to research and project work (Extended 4th edition)]. Celepler Matbaacılık.
8. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of education in science environment and health, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275649

9. Çiftçi, M., & Çınar, S. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin STEM mesleklerine bakış açılarının ve meslek farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi [Determining secondary school students' perspectives on STEM professions and their occupational awareness]. International Congress of Researches in Education.
10. CoHE (2015). Retrieved https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ on 06/25/2022.
11. Falco, L. D., & Summers, J. J. (2019). Improving career decision self-efficacy and STEM self-efficacy in high school girls: Evaluation of an intervention. Journal of Career Development, 46(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453177 21651
12. Fraenkel, J. K., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (third edition). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
13. Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112–126.
14. Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2018). Niçin STEM eğitimi?: Ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin STEM alanlarındaki kariyer tercihlerinin incelenmesi [Why STEM education? Examining the career preferences of 5th-grade secondary school students in STEM fields]. Journal of STEAM Education, 1(1), 1–23.
15. Karakaya, F., Avgin, S. S., & Yilmaz, M. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen-teknoloji-mühendislik-matematik (FeTeMM) mesleklerine olan ilgileri [Secondary school students' interest in science-technology-engineering-mathematics (STEM) professions]. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 36–53.
16. Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W. & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461–481.
17. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of environmental power monitoring activities on middle school student perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98–123.
18. Koyunlu Unlu, Z. K., Dokme, I., & Unlu, V. (2016). Adaptation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career interest survey (STEM-CIS) into Turkish. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(63), 21–36.
19. Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA Issue Brief# 03–11. US Department of Commerce. Retrieved from June 01, 2023, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522129.
20. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education what form? What function? Report, CurrTech Integrations, Baltimore.
21. Lent, R. W. (2005). A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 101–130). John Wiley & Sons.
22. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
23. Luo, T., So, W. W. M., Wan, Z. H., & Li, W. C. (2021). STEM stereotypes predict students’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–13.
24. Mangu, D. M., Lee, A. R., Middleton, J. A., & Nelson, J. K. (2015, October). Motivational factors predicting STEM and engineering career intentions for high school students. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
25. Medeiros, D. J. (2011). The influence of female social models in corporate STEM initiatives on girls' math and science attitudes. The University of Pennsylvania.
26. Ministry of National Education. (2018). "Curriculum Monitoring and Evaluation System-Curriculum." Retrieved from May 10, 2023, from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
27. Mohr‐Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., & Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing middle school students' interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: See Blue STEM Camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.
28. Moore, T., & Richards, L. G. (2012). P-12 Engineering Education Research and Practice. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2), 1–9.
29. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.
30. Next Generations Science Standards [NGSS] (2013). The next generation science standards executive summary. https://bit.ly/3whe2TS accessed 05/25/2022.
31. Noonan, R. (2017). STEM Jobs: 2017 Update. ESA Issue Brief# 02-17. US Department of Commerce.
32. Özkurt, Ö., & Yakin, İ. (2020). 2013-2019 Yılları arasında Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin STEM alanlarında kayıtlı öğrenci sayılarının cinsiyet bağlamında karşılaştırılması [Comparison of the number of students enrolled in STEM fields of universities in Turkey between 2013-2019 in terms of gender]. Euroasia Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7(13), 68–85.
33. Öztaban, A. & Satıcı, A. F. (2015). Bilişim teknolojileri alanında eğitim gören ortaöğretim öğrencileri doyum ölçeği: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları [Satisfaction scale for secondary school students studying in the field of information technologies: validity and reliability studies]. Journal of Vocational Sciences, 4(1), 1–7.
34. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS User Manual Step-by-Step Data Analysis with SPSS. (S. Balcı and B. Ahi, Translation). Anı Publishing.
35. Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science education, 96(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
36. Şahin, A., Ayar, M.C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). After-school activities involving science, technology, engineering and mathematics and their effects on students. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 14(1), 1–26.
37. Salzman, H. (2013). What shortages? The real evidence about the STEM workforce. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(4), 58–67.
38. Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM education: primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
39. Sarigül, M. and Çinar, S. (2021). Mühendislik tasarım odaklı fen bilimleri eğitiminde öğrencilerin meslek tercih ve algılarındaki değişim [Changes in internal profession preferences and perceptions in engineering design oriented science education]. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 23(3), 888–908. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.885023
40. Sasson, I. (2021). Becoming a scientist—career choice characteristics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10059-9
41. Scott, A. & Martin, A. (2012). Dissecting the data 2012: Examining STEM opportunities and outcomes for underrepresented students in California. Retrieved from May 15, 2023, from http://toped.svefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Achieve-LPFIstudy032812.pdf.
42. Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: A literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. Retrieved from May 14, 2023, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443172.pdf
43. Tas, B., & Bozkurt, E. (2019). Türkiye’de STEM Alanındaki Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizlikleri Araştırma ve İzleme Raporu [Research and monitoring report on gender inequalities in the field of STEM in Turkey]. Uçan Süpürge Kadın İletişim ve Araştırma Derneği [Your Impact EU Programme and Report of the Flying Broom Women's Communication and Research Association].
44. Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (10. baskı). [Assessment and evaluation in education. (10th Edition)]. Yargı Publications.
45. Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme teknikleri [Scaling techniques]. ÖSYM Publications, 2.
46. TÜSİAD (2014). STEM alanında eğitim almış işgücüne yönelik talep ve beklentiler araştırması [A study of the demands and expectations of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) trained workforce]. TUSIAD.
47. TUSIAD, (2017). Faaliyet raporu [Annual report]. Retrieved from May 25, 2023 from https://tusiad.org/tr/faaliyet-raporlari/item/9911-tusiad-faaliyetraporu-2017
48. UKCES (UK Commission for Employment and Skills), (2014). Employer skills survey 2013: UK results evidence. URL 1: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm
49. Vilorio, D. (2014). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow's jobs. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 58(1), 2–12.
50. Wang, H. (2012). A New era of science education: science teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) integration. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest, (3494678).
51. Wef. (2020). Global Competitiveness Index. https://www.weforum.org/reports accessed on 05/26/2022.
52. Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dundar, S. (2014). 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile fene karşı tutumlarına FeTeMM etkinliklerinin etkisi [The effect of STEM activities on 5th grade students' science process skills and attitudes towards science]. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 34(2), 249–265.
53. Yerdelen-Damar, S., Aksöz, B., Sezer, S., Arabacı, N. & Arıkan, F. (2021). Investigating the interrelationships among science and mathematics achievement, attitude towards STEM, and gender. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(2), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/buefad.778281
54. Yildirim, B., & Selvi, M. (2017). STEM uygulamaları ve tam öğrenmenin etkileri üzerine deneysel bir çalışma [An experimental study of STEM practices and the effects of full learning]. Theory and Practice in Education, 13, 183–210. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/1737