Investigation of Primary School Students'Book Reading Diaries

Abstract

When reading is considered as a lifelong learning activity, it is critical to diversify and expand the activities aimed at developing reading skills in primary school. Students are encouraged to keep reading diaries in order to help them develop reading habits, to give them the opportunity to reflect on the texts they read, and to record their personal reflections about the book. The aim of this study is to analyse primary school students' reading diaries. In this study, case study method, one of the qualitative approaches, was used. In this study, typical case sampling was preferred in order to select and analyse average examples of reading diaries. The study was conducted with the fourth grade students of a primary school in Şanlıurfa province and 37 students participated in the study. The data collection tool of the study was the reading diaries filled in individually by the students. The data obtained were analysed by content analysis. As a result of the research, the students wrote in their reading diaries the emotions generated by the book they read, basic information about the book, physical characteristics of the book, content characteristics of the book and their suggestions about the reading process of the book. Regarding the physical characteristics of the book they read, the students gave information about the size of the book and the visual features on the cover. It is noteworthy that students did not give information about the number of pages, page design and page structure of the book they read. Primary school students developed different suggestions for the book reading process in their diaries.

Keywords

• Turkish
• reading skills
• reading habits
• reading diary

References

1. Akyol, H. (2005). Turkish primary reading and writing teaching. Ankara: Gündüz Education.
2. Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. IRAL -International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.015
3. Apa, A. B. (2022). The relationship between attitude towards writing and writing skills: A meta-analysis study. Master's thesis, Gaziantep University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep.
4. Aşıkcan, M. (2019). An action research study on developing fluent reading skills in third-grade students, Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
5. Baştuğ, M., Hiğde, A., Çam, E., Örs, E., & Efe, P. (2019). Improving reading comprehension skills: Strategies, techniques, practices. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
6. Baydık, B. (2011). Investigation of students with reading difficulties' use of metacognitive reading strategies and their teachers' reading comprehension teaching practices. Education and Science, 36 (162), 301-319.
7. Block, C. C., & Parris, S. R. (2008). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
8. Block, C., & Israel, S. (2005). Reading first and Beyond: complete guide for teachers and literacy coaches. Corwin Press.

9. Browne, S., Chen, X., Baroudi, F., & Sevinc, E. (2021). Reader Response Theory. Literary and Critical Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190221911-0107.
10. Cain, K. (1999). Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strategies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 293 309. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165285
11. Calfee, R., & Piontkowski, D. (1981). The Reading diary: Acquisition of decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 346. https://doi.org/10.2307/747407.
12. Cantürk, Ö. (2014). An applied study on the writing of similarity/contrast paragraphs in Turkish teaching. Master's thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Çanakkale.
13. Çarkıt, C., & Karadüz, A. (2015). Teachers' views on teaching writing skills in the context of secondary school writing and writing skills course. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 4(2), https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v4i2.5000137223
14. Çiğdemir, S. (2021). Investigation of individual and environmental factors affecting the level of reading comprehension of primary school fourth grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara.
15. Çöltü İmren, C. and Çeker, R.S. (2017). A didactic comparison of Fatih Erdoğan's works ‘The Mother Who Turned into a Hamburger’ and ‘The Father Who Turned into a Sofa’ in the context of reading diaries. In H. Asutay (Ed.), Balkan Education Research 2017 (pp. 43-52), Edirne: Trakya University.
16. Demircan, C. (2014). External structural and internal structural analyses of the books in TUBITAK children's book series. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.85381
17. Diyazitdinova, A.R., & Salnikova D.A. (2024). Web application "electronic reader's diary" by agile technology. Povolzhskiy State University of Telecommunications and Informatics, 21(4), 65-74 https://doi.org/10.18469/ikt.2023.21.4.10
18. Duke, N., & Block, M. (2013). Improving reading in the primary grades. The Future of Children, 22, 55 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1353/FOC.2012.0017.
19. Ebrahimi, S. S. (2012). A comparison of different reading strategies in reading poems by EFL readers. International Conference on Language, 33, 99-104.
20. Eroğlu, Z. D. (2013). The relationship between pre-service teachers' reading habits and accurate writing skills. Turkish Studies, 8(9), 1441-1453.
21. Fedotova, S. (2021). Characteristics of extracurricular reading course in primary school protection of the reader's diary based on fairy tales. Academic Notes, 172-176. https://dspace.cusu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca471085-972a-48d9-8162-dcec619a62c5/content. Retrieved from
22. Geary, D. C. (2006). Evolutionary developmental psychology. Developmental Review, 26, 113-276.
23. Gündüz, O., & Şimşek, T. (2011). Reading education. Grafiker Publishing.
24. Güneş, F. (2004). Literacy teaching and brain technology. Ankara: Ocak Publishing.
25. Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods. New York: Longman.
26. Israel, S. E. (2007). Using metacognitive assessments to create individualised reading instruction, International Reading Association, 1-13.
27. Işıkoğlu Erdoğan, N., Şimşek, Z. C., & Canbeldek, M. (2017). The Effects of Home-Based Dialogue-Based Reading on the Language Development of 4-5 Year Old Children. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 37(2), 789-809.
28. Kandemir, M. (2023). The effect of the use of digital stories in primary school Turkish course on the fluent reading, reading comprehension and writing skills of 4th grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Eskisehir.
29. Karadağ, R., & Yurdakal, İ. H. (2016). Reading education. In F. Susar-Kırmızı (Ed.), Turkish teaching in primary and secondary schools (pp. 107-162). Ankara: Anı.
30. Kavcar, C., Oğuzhan, F. & Sever, S. (1995). Turkish teaching. Engin Publishing.
31. Keleş, C. (2020). Investigation of the effect of parent-supported reading intervention programme on fluent reading and reading comprehension skills of primary school students. Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University, Istanbul.
32. Keskinkılıç, K., & Keskinkılıç, S. B. (2005). Basic skills of Turkish and teaching primary reading and writing with sound-based sentence method. Asil Publication Distribution.
33. Lewis, R., & Teale, W. (1982). Primary school students' attitudes towards reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 5, 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9817.1982.TB00137.X.
34. Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1424-1429 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1424.
35. Marhaeni, A. (2016). Rosenblatt's transactional theory and ıts ımplementation in the teaching of ıntegrated reading. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(4), 206-219.
36. Neugebauer, S. (2013). A daily diary study of reading motivation inside and outside of School: A dynamic approach to motivation to read. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2012.10.011.
37. Noyes, A. (2004). Video diary: a method for exploring learning dispositions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34, 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640410001700561.
38. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756042
39. Özdemir, E. (1991). Text reading and analysing. Eskisehir: Anadolu University Open Education Faculty.
40. Pearson, P. D. (2009). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 3-32). New York: Routledge.
41. Polat, İ. (2022). Preparation and implementation of a writing skill development programme based on local environment and experiences. Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Ankara.
42. Rini, T. (2018). Creating critical literacy skills for young learners at primary school. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,1, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.2991/ECPE-18.2018.51.
43. Ronková, J., & Wildová, R. (2016). Reading strategies activated in experimental research. Procedia -Social and Behavioural Sciences, 217, 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.02.103.
44. Sağırlı, M. (2022). The evaluation of the first grade writing basic language skill acquisitions related to preparation for writing, writing and writing style in terms of their adequacy with the explanations and examples in the Turkish curriculum (2019). Iğdır University Journal of Social Sciences, 31, 369-389.
45. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1992). Influence of reading-comprehension strategy information on children's achievement outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(1), 51-64.
46. Sever, S. (2011). Turkish teaching and full learning. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
47. Soysal, T. (2022). The effect of deepening writing and interactive writing strategies on the writing success of primary school third grade students. Master's thesis, Istanbul Aydın University Institute of Postgraduate Education, Istanbul.
48. Tompkins, G. E. (2010). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176-200). New York: Guilford.
50. Turbill, J. (2002). The four ages of reading philosophy and pedagogy: A framework for examining theory and practice. Reading Online: International Perspectives, 5(6), 1 13.
51. Turgut Bayram, Z. (2009). The effect of illustrated children's books on reading habits. Master's thesis. Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
52. Ungan, S. (2008). The cultural infrastructure of our reading habits. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 218-228.
53. Ülper, H. (2021). Gaining reading and comprehension skills. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
54. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin publishing house
55. Zelko, A., Sirenko, V., & Strelnikova, A. (2021). Pedagogical feasibility of the use of a reflective diary in the educational process of primary school children. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2021-31-4-463-468.