Araştırma Makalesi

LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER

Öz

                American literature as well as the history of world literature. The story focuses on a short trip of the narrator to the family mansion of Roderick Usher who mysteriously invited him to vist Usher and his sister, Lady Usher. Upon Lady Usher’s death, the house literally falls apart and the narrator hardly manages to escape to tell the story to the rest of us. The House of Usher story is not significant for horror elements and its gothic atmosphere but beyond that it has been regarded as a cornerstone in the history of literature as it reflects radical historical and social transformation in the 19th century America, it successfully portrays the dilemmas of the enlightenment intellectuals after the fall of aristocracy, and it highlights the disillusionment of modern industrilization. In this respect, this article will seek to investigate the story that presents a world of anxiety, ambiguity, and collapse with a new historicist approach which enables a historical and ideological analysis of gothic genre, and the House of Usher story in particular.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abel, Darrel. “Usherlar’ın Evinin Anahtarı”. Kitaplık Edebiyat Dergisi. Ed. Murat Yalçın.Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Nisan 2004. s. 81‐89.Armitt, Lucie. Contemporary Women’s Fiction and the Fantastic. Great Britain: MacMillanPress, 2000Barrett, Michelle. Marx’tan Foucault’ya İdeoloji. Çev. Ahmet Fethi. İstanbul: Mavi Ada, 2000Brannigan, John. “Introduction: History, Power and Politics in the Literary Artifact”. LiteraryTheories: A Reader and A Guide. Ed. Julian Wolfreys. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,1999. s. 417‐427Cohen, Walter. “Marxist Criticism”. Redrawing the Boundaries. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt andGiles Gunn. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 1992. s. 320‐348.Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press,1983Frye, Northrop. “The Mythos of Summer:Romance”. Modern Genre Theory. Ed. David Duff.Edinburgh: Longman, 2000. s. 98‐118Jameson, Frederick. “Magical Narratives: On the Dialectical Use of Genre Criticism”. ModernGenre Theory. Ed. David Duff. Edinburgh: Longman, 2000. s. 167‐193Jameson, Fredrick. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso,1993Karl, Frederick. R. “Gothic, Gothicism, Gothicists” The Adversary of Literature: The EnglishNovel in the Eighteenth Century‐A Study in Genre . New York: Farrar, 1974. s. 235‐274Lawrence, D. H.. Klasik Amerikan Edebiyatı Üzerine İncelemeler. Istanbul: Yapı KrediYayınları, 1996Leatherbarrow, David. “Mimari Poetikanın Mirası”. Kitaplık Edebiyat Dergisi. Ed. MuratYalçın. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Nisan 2004. s. 71‐81.Montrose, Louis. “New Historicisms”. Redrawing the Boundaries. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt andGiles Gunn. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.,1992. s. 392‐418.Oskay, Ünsal. Çağdaş Fantazya. Ankara: Ayko Yayıncılık, 1982.Poe, Edgar Allan. Selected Tales. London: Penguin Classics, 1994. s. 76‐95Punter, David. The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the PresentDay. London & NY: Longman, 1980.Ruland, Richard and Malcolm Bradbury. From Puritanism to Postmodernism‐ A History ofAmerican Literature. New York: Viking, 1991.Taniyan, Baysar. “Denying the Narrator: Julian Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending”. EnglishStudies: New Perspectives. Ed. Mehmet Ali Çelikel and Baysar Taniyan. New Castle: CambridgeScholars Publishing, 2015. s. 52‐59.Todorov, Tzvetan. “The Origin of Genres”. Modern Genre Theory. Ed. David Duff. Edinburgh:Longman, 2000. s. 193‐210Waugh, Patricia. Feminine Fictions. London and New York: Routledge, 1988

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Aralık 2018

Kabul Tarihi

30 Aralık 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Göç, M. (2018). LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. Bartın Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 3-12. https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ
AMA
1.Göç M. LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. BARED. 2018;3(2):3-12. https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ
Chicago
Göç, Murat. 2018. “LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER”. Bartın Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3 (2): 3-12. https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ.
EndNote
Göç M (01 Aralık 2018) LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. Bartın Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3 2 3–12.
IEEE
[1]M. Göç, “LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER”, BARED, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 3–12, Ara. 2018, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ
ISNAD
Göç, Murat. “LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER”. Bartın Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3/2 (01 Aralık 2018): 3-12. https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ.
JAMA
1.Göç M. LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. BARED. 2018;3:3–12.
MLA
Göç, Murat. “LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER”. Bartın Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 3, sy 2, Aralık 2018, ss. 3-12, https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ.
Vancouver
1.Murat Göç. LAUGH BUT SMILE NO MORE: IDEOLOGY AND HISTORY IN THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF USHER. BARED [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2018;3(2):3-12. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA98TE92FJ

 

 edebiyatdergi@bartin.edu.tr