HAMAS-ISRAEL CONFLICT AND PROPAGANDA: ANALYSIS OF VIDEOS ON THE X PLATFORM OF THE ISRAELI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Öz

Today, people are exposed to a wide range of propaganda content through social media platforms without time and space restrictions. Particularly in times of war and conflict, the parties carry out their propaganda activities through social media platforms. In this study, six videos published by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the X platform between October 7, 2023 and February 7, 2024 during the Israel-Hamas conflict, which started on October 7, 2023 and is still ongoing, were analyzed in the context of audio-visual propaganda using the visual-verbal video analysis method (VVVA) developed by Fazeli et al. The main criteria for determining the six videos selected and analyzed through purposive sampling within the scope of the study were that they were shot and edited professionally in a studio environment, that they did not contain real and current images and that they were short propaganda films. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the videos contained the themes of evoking empathy, appealing to fear, international public opinion and identification. It has been observed that Israel uses these videos, which are professionally prepared and distributed to people through social media platforms, to justify itself during the war process, to mobilize emotions, to gain legitimacy, and to win the support of international public opinion. All semantic and physical components of the videos are strategically constructed to achieve this goal. With these videos, which are part of Israel's propaganda activities, it has been determined that Israel effectively utilizes the power of visual narratives in this age where visual culture, speed and consumption are at the forefront.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Propaganda
• Audio-Visual Propaganda
• The Visual-Verbal Video Analysis Method
• Israel-Hamas Conflict
• X Social Media Platform

HAMAS-İSRAİL ÇATIŞMASI VE PROPAGANDA: İSRAİL DIŞİŞLERİ BAKANLIĞI X PLATFORMUNDA YER ALAN VİDEOLARIN ANALİZİ

Öz

Günümüzde insanlar; sosyal medya platformları aracılığıyla, zaman ve mekân kısıtlaması olmaksızın propaganda niteliği taşıyan birçok içeriğe maruz kalmaktadır. Özellikle savaş ve çatışma dönemlerinde taraflar, propaganda faaliyetlerini sosyal medya platformları aracılığıyla yürütmektedir. Bu çalışmada 7 Ekim 2023 tarihinde başlayan ve hâlâ devam eden İsrail-Hamas çatışması sürecinde İsrail Dışişleri Bakanlığının X platformunda 7 Ekim 2023-7 Şubat 2024 tarihleri arasında yayınladığı altı video, görsel-işitsel propaganda bağlamında Fazeli ve arkadaşlarının (2023) geliştirdiği görsel-sözel video analiz yöntemiyle (GSVA) çözümlenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında amaçlı örnekleme yoluyla seçilen ve çözümlenen altı videonun belirlenmesindeki temel ölçütler; videoların stüdyo ortamında, profesyonel bir şekilde çekilmiş ve kurgulanmış olmaları, gerçek ve güncel görüntüler içermemeleri ve kısa propaganda filmi olma niteliği taşımalarıdır. Yapılan çözümlemeler sonucunda videoların empati uyandırma, korkuya başvurma, uluslararası kamuoyu ve özdeşleştirme temalarını içerdiği belirlenmiştir. İsrail’in profesyonel bir biçimde hazırladığı ve sosyal medya platformları aracılığıyla insanlara ulaştırdığı bu videoları; savaş sürecinde haklılığını ortaya koyma, duyguları harekete geçirme, meşruiyet kazanma ve uluslararası kamuoyunun desteğini alma amacıyla kullandığı görülmüştür. Videoların anlamsal ve fiziksel tüm bileşenleri, bu amacı gerçekleştirmek için stratejik bir biçimde kurgulanmıştır. İsrail’in propaganda faaliyetlerinin bir parçası olan bu videolar ile görsel kültürün, hızın ve tüketimin ön planda olduğu bu çağda görsel anlatıların gücünden etkili bir biçimde yararlandığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Propaganda
• Görsel-İşitsel Propaganda
• Görsel-Sözel Video Analiz Yöntemi
• İsrail-Hamas Çatışması
• X Sosyal Medya Platformu

Kaynakça

1. AIContentfy. (2023). The importance of visual content for your marketing strategy. https://aicontentfy.com/en/blog/importance-of-visual-content-for-marketing-strategy
2. AREM (2021). Camera Shot Size Nedir? Kamera Çekim Ölçekleri Nelerdir? https://aremajans.com/camera-shot-size-nedir-kamera-cekim-olcekleri-nelerdir/
3. Bahar, H. M. (2020) Social media and disinformation in war propaganda: how Afghan government and the Taliban use Twitter. Media Asia, 47(1-2), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2020.1822634.
4. Ben-David, S., Campos, M., Nahal, P., Kuber, S., Jordan, G., & DeLuca, J. (2024). Applying the visual-verbal video analysis framework to understand how mental illness is represented in the TV show Euphoria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231223653
5. Bjola, C. (2018). The ethics of countering digital propaganda. Ethics and International Affairs, 32(03), 305- 315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679418000436
6. CIA (2016) The Spymaster's Toolkit https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/the-spymasters-toolkit/
7. Demirtaş, H. (2022). Filmleri nasıl algılar ve hissederiz: Ayna nöronlar, empati ve sinemada özdeşleşme. M. Yılmaz (Ed.). İletişim Psikolojisi (ss. 93-111). Nobel.
8. Dodge, R. (1920). The psychology of propaganda. Religious Education, 15 (5), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408200150502

9. Domingos (2023). NAT: Propaganda in the Digital Age https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/nat-propaganda-digital-age-vitor-domingos
10. Dovetail Editorial Team (2023). What is purposive sampling? https://dovetail.com/research/purposive-sampling/
11. Ekman, P. (2004). Universal Emotions. https://www.paulekman.com/universal-emotions/
12. Erbschloe, M. (2018). Extremist propaganda in social media: A threat to homeland security. CRC Press.
13. Fallon, P. K. (2022). Propaganda 2.1: Understanding propaganda in the digital age. Cascade Books.
14. Fazeli, S., Sabetti, J., & Ferrari, M. (2023). Performing qualitative content analysis of video data in social sciences and medicine: The visual-verbal video analysis method data in social sciences and medicine: The visual-verbal video analysis method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https:// doi.org/10.1177/16094069231185452
15. Goldstein, C. S. (2009). Capturing the German eye: American visual propaganda in occupied Germany. The University of Chicago Press.
16. Gray, B. (1999).The nervous liberals: Propaganda anxieties from World War I to theCold War. (1th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Green, F. (1988). American propaganda abroad (1th ed.).Hippocrene Books.
18. Guth, D.W. (2009). Black, white, and shades of gray: the sixty-year debate over propaganda versus public diplomacy. Journal of Promotion Management, 14 (3-4), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490802624083
19. Hirose, A. (2022). Complete guide to creating stunning visual content for social media. Hootsuite. https://blog.hootsuite.com/epic-guide-creating-social-media-visuals/
20. Jowett, G. S. & O’Donnell, V. (2012). Propaganda and persuasion (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
21. Kaczkowski, W. (2019). Qualitative content analysis of images of children in Islamic State’s Dabiq and Rumiyah magazines. Contemporary Voices, 1(2), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.1470
22. Lambert, R. S. (1939). Propaganda. (1th ed.) Thomas Nelson & Sons.
23. Lang, M. (2017). Number of Americans exposed to Russian propaganda rises, as tech giants testify. Retrieved from http://www. sfchronicle.com/business/article/FacebookGoogle-Twitter-say-150-million-12323900.php
24. Macnair, L., & Frank, R. (2017). “To my brothers in the west . . .”: A thematic analysis of videos produced by the Islamic State’s al-Hayat media center. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(3), 234-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986217699313
25. Martin, L. J. (1958). International propaganda: Its legal and diplomatic control (NED-New edition). University of Minnesota Press.
26. Neyazi, T.A. (2019). Digital propaganda, political bots and polarized politics in India, Asian. Journal of Communucation, 30 (1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1699938
27. Nichols, T. (2018). Visuals are the key to creating great customer-brand connections. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/04/27/visuals-are-the-key-to-creating-great-customer-brand-connections/
28. Özkoç, Ö. (2009). Savaş ve barış: Doksanlı yıllarda Filistin- İsrail sorunu. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(03), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002117
29. Pantti, M. (2019). The personalisation of conflict reporting: Visual coverage of the Ukraine crisis on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1399807
30. Pedrini, P. P. (2018). Propaganda, persuasion, and the Great War (1th ed.). Abingdon: OX: Routledge.
31. Pelzer, R. (2005). Technical reproduction and its significance. M. Rampley (Ed.). Exploring visual culture: Definitions, concepts, contexts (pp. 197-213). Edinburg University Press
32. Pfau, M., Haigh, M., Fifrick, A., Holl, D., Tedesco, A., Cope, J., Nunnally, D., Schiess, A., Preston, D., Roszkowski, P., & Martin, M. (2006). The effects of print news photographs of the casualties of war. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 150-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300110
33. Rampley, M. (2005). Visual practices in the age of industry. M. Rampley (Ed.). Exploring visual culture: Definitions, concepts, contexts (pp. 179-196). Edinburg University Press.
34. Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
35. Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication, Review of Communication, 12(2), 118-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
36. Seo, H. (2014). Visual propaganda in the age of social media: An ampirical analysis of Twitter images during the Israeli-Hamas conflict. Visual Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2014.955501.
37. Seo, H. (2020). Visual propaganda and social media. P. Baines, N. O’Shaughnessy ve N. Snow (Eds.), The sage handbook of propaganda (pp. 126-136). Sage Publications.
38. Seo, H. & Ebrahim, H. (2016). Visual propaganda on Facebook: A comparative analysis of Syrian conflicts. Media, War & Conflict, 9(3), 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635216661648
39. Shabo, M. E. (2008). Techniques of propaganda & persuasion. Prestwick House, Inc.
40. Soules, M. (2015). Media, persuasion and propaganda (1th ed.). Edinburg University Press.
41. Sprout Social. (2023). The 2023 Content Benchmarks Report. https://media.sproutsocial.com/uploads/2022/12/Sprout-Social-The-Content-Benchmarks-Report_2023_v5.pdf
42. Taylan, A. (2015). Nitel ve nicel araştırmalarda evren ve örneklem seçimi ve sorunlar. B. Yıldırım (Ed.). Iletişim araştırmalarında yöntemler uygulama ve örneklerle (ss. 47-85). Literatürk Academia.
43. Trombeta, G., & Cox, S. M. (2022). The textual-visual thematic analysis: A framework to analyze the conjunction and interaction of visual and textual data. The Qualitative Report, 27(6), 1557-1574. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5456
44. Venkatesh, V., Podoshen, J. S., Wallin, J., Rabah, J. & Glass, D. (2020). Promoting extreme violence: Visual and narrative analysis of select ultraviolent terror propaganda videos produced by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in 2015 and 2016. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(8), 1753-1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1516209
45. Welch, D. (2017). World War II propaganda: Analyzing the art of persuasion during wartime (1th ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
46. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin.
47. Yıldırım, Y. (2021). İsrail-Filistin sorununda iki devletli çözüm arayışları. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(41), 3840-3884. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.874933