THE CRITICISM OF SECULAR CRITICISM

Öz

This article examines the relationship between secularism and literary criticism. When viewed from the perspective of academic and literary traditions in the West, it is easy to see that secularism, which has left almost no area untouched by its dominance, continues to maintain the same dominant attitude when it comes to literary criticism. This situation leads to the interpretation of works, especially when it concerns the subject of faith, sterilization and even incomprehension of universe of meaning of a literary work. Furthermore, the problems, misconceptions and limitations within secularism also show that this structure of thought needs to be enriched by including religious and spiritual criticism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Seculerism
• Religion
• Criticism
• Theory
• Literature

SEKÜLER ELEŞTİRİNİN ELEŞTİRİSİ

Öz

Bu makale, sekülerizm ve edebi eleştiri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Batı’daki akademik ve edebi gelenekler açısından bakıldığında, hemen hemen hiçbir alanı etkisi dışında bırakmayan sekülerizmin, edebi eleştiri söz konusu olduğunda da aynı baskın tavrı sürdürmeye devam ettiği kolayca görülmektedir. Bu durum, özellikle inanç konusunu ele alan eserlerin yorumlanmasında, edebi bir eserin anlam evreninin sterilize edilmesine ve hatta anlaşılmaz hale gelmesine yol açmaktadır. Ayrıca, sekülerizmin kendi içindeki sorunlar, yanlış anlamalar ve sınırlamalar, bu düşünce yapısının dini ve manevi eleştiriyi içerecek şekilde zenginleştirilmesi gerektiğini de göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Laiklik
• Din
• Eleştiri
• Teori
• Edebiyat

Kaynakça

1. Asad, T., Brown, W., Butler, J., & Mahmood, S. (2009). Is critique secular?: Blasphemy, injury, and free speech. University of California Press.
2. Benedict, X. V. I. (t.y.). (2006, September 12). Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and Reflections.
3. Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless Speech. Semiotext(e).
4. Foucault, M. (1996). What is critique?. In J Schmidt (Ed.) What is Enlightenment?: eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions (pp. 382-398). University of California Press.
5. Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster.
6. Gauchet, M. (1997). The disenchantment of the world: A political history of religion. Princeton University Press.
7. Koselleck, R. (1988). Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society (Çev. T. McCarthy). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Marx, K. (1978). Contribution to the critique of Hegel’s philosophy of right: Introduction. The Marx-Engels Reader.

9. Roberts, J. H., & Turner, J. (2000). The sacred and the secular university. Princeton University Press.
10. Said, E. (1983). The World, the Text, and the Critic. Harvard University Press.
11. Taylor C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge university press.
13. Zabala, S. (2005). Introduction: A religion without theists or atheists. In S. Zabala (Ed.), The Future of Religion (pp. 1-28). Columbia University Press.