AN EXAMINATION OF FAMILY OBLIGATIONS AND SOCIAL WORK PRACTICES IN THE CHILD PROTECTION SYSTEM USING THE QUALITATIVE DOCUMENT ANALYSIS

Öz

The primary objective of this study is to analyse national and international legal regulations on family obligations within the child protection system, to evaluate the provisions on family obligations in the legislation, and to assess which areas these provisions cover in social work practice. The research used qualitative document analysis to examine the content of national and international legal regulations. Based on the findings obtained from the research, categories such as “Protection Obligation,” “Care and Supervision Obligation,” and “Education Obligation” were identified. It was concluded that, within the scope of social work practices, while family obligations must be well understood by professionals working in child protection, it is also necessary to learn intervention systems for situations arising from these obligations. Furthermore, it is recommended that research be conducted on families’ perceptions of family obligations, evaluations aimed at developing social policies related to family obligations, an impact analysis of existing obligations, and the updating of necessary legal regulations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• child protection
• family obligations
• social work
• national and ınternatıonal legislation

ÇOCUK KORUMA SİSTEMİNDE AİLE YÜKÜMLÜLÜĞÜ VE SOSYAL HİZMET UYGULAMALARININ NİTEL DOKÜMAN ANALİZİ YÖNTEMİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, çocuk koruma sistemi içerisinde aile yükümlülüğüne ilişkin ulusal ve uluslararası yasal düzenlemeleri analiz ederek, mevzuat içinde yer alan aile yükümlülüklerine ilişkin düzenlemelerin değerlendirilmesi ve sosyal hizmet uygulamalarında hangi alanları kapsadığına dair değerlendirmede bulunmaktır. Araştırma kapsamında ulusal ve uluslararası yasal düzenlemelerin içeriğini analiz etmek amacıyla nitel doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular kapsamında “Koruma Yükümlülüğü”, “Bakım Gözetim Yükümlülüğü” ve “Eğitim Yükümlülüğü” şeklinde kategoriler belirlenmiştir. Sosyal hizmet uygulamaları kapsamında aile yükümlülüklerinin çocuk koruma alanında çalışan meslek elemanları tarafından iyi anlaşılmasının yanında, aile yükümlülüklerinden doğan durumlara müdahale sistemlerinin öğrenilmesi gerektiği anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca ailelerin aile yükümlülüğü algıları, aile yükümlülüklerine ilişkin sosyal politikaların geliştirilmesine yönelik değerlendirmeler, mevcut yükümlülüklerin etki analizi ve ihtiyaç duyulan yasal düzenlemelerin güncellenmesi gibi alanlarda araştırma yapılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• çocuk koruma
• aile yükümlülüğü
• sosyal hizmet
• Ulusal ve Uluslararası Mevzuat

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen herhangi bir kurum yoktur

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
2. Akın, M. (2013). Aile içi şiddet. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 71(1), 27–41.
3. Akşit, M. A., Kuşku, M., Oktay, G., & Şaylıgil, Ö. (2016). Prematüre hakları. Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Yenidoğan Dergisi, 1(2), 18–23.
4. Aktaş, A. M. (2004). Aile terapisinde sosyal hizmet yaklaşımı. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.29223.
5. Akyüz, E. (2012). Çocuk hukuku. Pegem Akademi.
6. Amin, M. I. (2023). The role of family in shaping identity: A study of internal mechanisms and socio-cultural transmission. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 381–382.
7. Anderson, J. (2014). The impact of family structure on the health of children: Effects of divorce. The Linacre Quarterly, 81(4), 378-387. https://doi.org/10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000087.
8. Armstrong, C. (2021). Key methods used in qualitative document analysis. OSF Preprints, 1(9), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3996213.

9. Ateş, D. (2021). İsviçre hukukundaki gelişmeler ışığında ana babanın ergin çocuğun bakım ve eğitim giderlerini karşılama yükümlülüğü. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, (47), 179-214.
10. Aunos, M., & Pacheco, L. (2021). Able or unable: How do professionals determine the parenting capacity of mothers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 15(3), 357-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1729923.
11. Bain, K. (2009). Parental responsibility. Social Work & Society, 7(1), 138–141. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-20385.
12. Bearak, J., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., Moller, A. B., Tunçalp, Ö., Beavin, C., ... & Alkema, L. (2020). Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. The Lancet Global Health, 8(9), e1152-e1161.
13. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
14. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
15. Bridgeman, J. (2022). Parental responsibility and public responsibilities for the welfare of children. In J. M. Scherpe & S. Gilmore (Eds.), Family matters: Essays in honour of John Eekelaar (pp. 947–960). Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839703102.060
16. Bryner Jr, C. L. (2001). Children of divorce. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 14(3), 201-210.
17. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (24. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
18. Churchill, H. (2011). Parental rights and responsibilities: Analysing social policy and lived experiences (1st ed.). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgv2z.
19. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications.
20. Dabbagh, T., Roer‐Strier, D., & Kurman, J. (2017). Perspectives on filial responsibility among uprooted families from South Lebanon. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12290.
21. De Zordo, S., Zanini, G., Mishtal, J., Garnsey, C., Ziegler, A. K., & Gerdts, C. (2021). Gestational age limits for abortion and cross‐border reproductive care in Europe: a mixed‐methods study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 128(5), 838-845. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16534.
22. Değirmencioğlu, B. (2026). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi içtihatlarında “refakatsiz küçükler”: Çocuğun yüksek yararı bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Çukurova Üniversitesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.59399/cuhad.1793556
23. Diriwari, W. (2023). Parental responsibilities and the best interests of vulnerable children in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Global Policy, 8(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.56201/jlgp.v8.no1.2023.pg83.90
24. Duyan, V. (2010). Sosyal hizmet: Temelleri, yaklaşımları, müdahale yöntemleri. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayını (Yayın No. 16).
25. Early, T. J., & GlenMaye, L. F. (2000). Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective. Social Work, 45(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/45.2.118.
26. El Nokali, N. E., Bachman, H. J., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child development, 81(3), 988-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01447.x
27. Erdim, L., & Ergün, A. (2016). Boşanmanın ebeveyn ve çocuk üzerindeki etkileri. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi, 3(1), 78-84.
28. Feldman, R. (2007). Maternal versus child risk and the development of parent–child and family relationships in five high-risk populations. Development and Psychopathology, 19(2), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407070150.
29. Foster, E. M. (2002). How economists think about family resources and child development. Child Development, 73(6), 1904-1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00513.
30. Frost, N., Johnson, L., Stein, M., & Wallis, L. (2000). Home-Start and the delivery of family support. Children & Society, 14(5), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00188.x.
31. Idris, R., & Nursita, L. (2025). The impact of family economic background and educational expenses on student learning motivation. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcis.v11i2.7
32. Karaağaç, H. (2025). Dijital dünyada çocuk hakları: Türkiye'deki aile ve çocuk politikalarına ilişkin analitik bir bakış. Ombudsman Akademik, Özel Sayı 3 (Aile), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.32002/ombudsmanakademik.1696547
33. Karataş, K. (2007). Türkiye’de çocuk koruma sistemi ve koruyucu aile uygulamaları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 18(2), 7-20.
34. Kero, A., & Lalos, A. (2000). Ambivalence—A logical response to legal abortion: A prospective study among women and men. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 21(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674820009075613
35. Kılıç, F., & Kılıç, Ü. (2023). Türk Aile Hukukunda Ailenin Korunması. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 19(2), 482-491.
36. Kıraç Adır, E. (2025). Ana babanın engelli çocuğa karşı eğitim ve bakım yükümlülüğü: Türk Medeni Kanunu hükümleri çerçevesinde bir inceleme. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, (64), 95-140. https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1810188.
37. Kukhianidze, K., & Kitoshvili, N. (2025). Children’s rights and parental responsibilities. Socrates, 32(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.32.2025.2.70-77.
38. Lerner, R. M., Rothbaum, F., Boulos, S., & Castellino, D. R. (2002). Developmental systems perspective on parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Biology and ecology of parenting (pp. 315–344). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
39. Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301
40. MacGregor, T. E., Rodger, S., Cummings, A. L., & Leschied, A. W. (2006). The needs of foster parents: A qualitative study of motivation, support, and retention. Qualitative social work, 5(3), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006067365.
41. Malia, S. E. (2005). Balancing family members’ interests regarding stepparent rights and obligations: A social policy challenge. Family Relations, 54(2), 298-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2005.00023.x.
42. Margretha, S., & Djaja, B. (2023). Management of property of minors under guardianship. Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(7), 752-757. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i7.125.
43. Mass, M., & van Nijnatten, C. (2005). Child protection and the conception of parental responsibility. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.2.220.
44. Millar, J. (1996). Family obligations and social policy: The case of child support. Policy Studies, 17(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442879608423706
45. Millar, J., & Warman, A. (1996). Family obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre.
46. Moschella, M. (2014). Natural law, parental rights and education policy. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 59(2), 197-227. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auu010
47. National Association of Social Workers. (1997). NASW standards for social work practice in child protection (Reprinted ed.). NASW. (Original work published 1981)
48. National Association of Social Workers. (2013). NASW standards for social work practice in child welfare. NASW Press.
49. Norlin, J., & Randell, E. (2023). Social workers’ perceptions of assessing the parental capacity of parents with intellectual disabilities in child protection investigations. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 27(4), 976-993. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295221113717.
50. Özmete, E., & Demir, B. (2025). Suçun Önlenmesinde Ailenin Önemi ve Aile Odaklı Sosyal Hizmet Müdahaleleri: Sistematik Bir İnceleme. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 9(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.70989/scd.1763719.
51. Pruett, M. K., Williams, T. Y., Insabella, G., & Little, T. D. (2003). Family and legal indicators of child adjustment to divorce among families with young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.169.
52. Ranson, K. E., & Urichuk, L. J. (2008). The effect of parent–child attachment relationships on child biopsychosocial outcomes: A review. Early Child Development and Care, 178(2), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430600685282
53. Rhodes, K. W., Orme, J. G., & McSurdy, M. (2003). Foster parent's role performance responsibilities: Perceptions of foster mothers, fathers, and workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 25(12), 935-964.
54. Roostin, E. (2018). Family influence on the development of children. PrimaryEdu: Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v1i1.654.
55. Sheafor, B. W., & Horejsi, C. R. (2015). Techniques and guidelines for social work practice (10th ed.). Pearson. Such, E., & Walker, R. (2005). Young citizens or policy objects? Children in the ‘rights and responsibilities’ debate. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008256.
56. Şirin, M. C. (2019). Çocuğun yararı gözüyle çocuğun yüksek yararı ilkesine bakış. Çocuk ve Medeniyet, 4(8), 219-240.
57. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası. (1982). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası.
58. Tsai, K. M., Telzer, E. H., Gonzales, N. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2015). Parental cultural socialization of Mexican-American adolescents’ family obligation values and behaviors. Child development, 86(4), 1241-1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12358.
59. UNICEF. (2004). Çocuk haklarına dair sözleşme. UNICEF, Türkiye.
60. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2016). Family policies and programmes in the 2030 Agenda. United Nations.
61. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations.
62. Waldfogel, J. (2009). Prevention and the child protection system. The Future of Children, 19(2), 195–210.
63. Yan, J., Li, X., Wang, J., Bolick, B., & Kim, S. Y. (2025). Sociocultural stress and warmth in Mexican immigrant mothers: The protective role of family obligation values. Journal of Family Psychology, 39(8), 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001382.
64. Yıldız, B. N., & Karataş, M. (2024). Çocuk evleri hizmet modelinde psikososyal destek sağlayan meslek elemanlarının deneyimleri: Sivil toplum kuruluşu örneği. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 35(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.1185725
65. Zastrow, C. (2016). Sosyal hizmete giriş (D. B. Çiftçi, Çev. Ed.; 4. bs.). Nika Yayınevi.
66. Zhu, P., Wu, M., Huang, P., Zhao, X., & Ji, X. (2020). Children from nuclear families with bad parental relationship could develop tic symptoms. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 8(7), e1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1286.