LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES OF HIGH-ACHIEVING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS: FROM THE CLASSROOM TO EVERYDAY PRACTICE

Öz

This study focused on the language learning strategies of 207 high-achieving high school students at a project-based school that implements a specialised curriculum. The students received certificates of appreciation and high-achievement awards for their academic success. Data were collected using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (Oxford, 1990) and semi-structured interview questions. The results showed that students reported using social strategies most, while affective strategies were used least. Female students reported significantly higher use of memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, and social strategies, whereas no significant gender difference was found in affective strategy use. Grade-level differences were limited to affective strategies. Ninth-grade students reported significantly higher use of affective strategies than twelfth-grade students. Interview results offered deeper insight into how students applied these strategies in practice. A prominent qualitative finding was students’ integration of English into everyday life through media, games, online interaction, and other daily activities. Rather than restricting English to formal study, many students indicated that they engaged with regular exposure to the language as an integral part of their daily routines. They also reported preferring memory and cognitive strategies to support their vocabulary and learning. On the other hand, affective strategies were less prominent than other strategy types. Overall, the findings suggest that these high-achieving students integrated English into their everyday lives through meaningful practice and reflective engagement, and described language learning as more natural, enjoyable, and personally relevant when embedded in their daily routines.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Language learning strategies
• Metacognitive and affective strategies
• Everyday language learning
• Gender differences
• High achieving high school students

ÜSTÜN BAŞARI GÖSTEREN LİSE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ: SINIFTAN GÜNLÜK YAŞAMA

Öz

Bu çalışma, özel bir müfredata sahip proje tabanlı bir okulda öğrenim gören 207 üstün başarılı lise öğrencisinin dil öğrenme stratejilerini incelemiştir. Öğrenciler akademik başarıları nedeniyle takdir ve üstün başarı belgeleri almışlardır. Veriler, Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Envanteri (Oxford, 1990) ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Anket sonuçları, sosyal stratejilerin en sık, duyuşsal stratejilerin ise en az kullanılan stratejiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Kız öğrenciler bellek, bilişsel, telafi, üstbilişsel ve sosyal stratejileri anlamlı düzeyde daha fazla kullandıklarını bildirirken, duyuşsal strateji kullanımında cinsiyete göre anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. Sınıf düzeyine ilişkin farklılıklar yalnızca duyuşsal stratejilerde görülmüş ve dokuzuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin bu stratejileri on ikinci sınıf öğrencilerine göre anlamlı düzeyde daha fazla kullandıkları belirlenmiştir. Görüşmeler, öğrencilerin bu stratejileri uygulamada nasıl kullandıklarına ilişkin daha derinlemesine bilgiler sunmuştur. Nitel bulgularda öne çıkan sonuçlardan biri, öğrencilerin İngilizceyi medya, oyunlar, çevrim içi etkileşim ve diğer günlük etkinlikler aracılığıyla günlük yaşamlarına entegre etmeleridir. İngilizceyi yalnızca formal çalışma ile sınırlandırmak yerine, birçok öğrenci düzenli olarak İngilizceye maruz kalmayı ve İngilizce kullanımını günlük rutinlerinin bir parçası olarak tanımlamıştır. Öğrenciler ayrıca kelime ve dil öğrenimini desteklemek amacıyla bellek ve bilişsel stratejileri kullandıklarını belirtirken, duyuşsal stratejilerin daha az öne çıktığı görülmüştür. Genel olarak bulgular, bu üstün başarılı öğrencilerin İngilizceyi düzenli kullanım, anlamlı uygulama ve yansıtıcı katılım yoluyla günlük yaşamlarına entegre ettiklerini ve dil öğrenimini günlük rutinlerinin bir parçası hâline getirdiklerinde öğrenme sürecini daha doğal, keyifli ve kişisel olarak anlamlı olarak tanımladıklarını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dil öğrenme stratejileri
• Üstbilişsel ve duyuşşal stratejiler
• Günlük yaşamda dil öğrenimi
• Cinsiyet farklılıkları
• Üstün başarılı lise öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Alfian. (2021). The favored language learning strategies of Islamic university EFL learners. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17844
2. Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language learning strategies use by Saudi EFL students: The effect of duration of English language study and gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03
3. Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757–771). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
5. Balkaya, Ş. (2023). Social strategies in language learning for promoting speaking skills. Research on Education and Psychology, 7(Special Issue 2), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1362414
6. Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410251
7. Cesur, M. O. (2011). Can language learning strategies predict Turkish university prep class students’ achievement in reading comprehension? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1920–1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.028
8. Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb03138.x

9. Charoento, M. (2017). Individual learner differences and language learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 7(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v7i2.875
10. Chen, M.-L. (2009). Influence of grade level on perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies of Taiwanese English as a foreign language learners. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.02.004
11. Chen, M.-L. (2014). Age differences in the use of language learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p144
12. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
13. Dawadi, S. (2017). Language learning strategies profiles of EFL learners in Nepal. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 2(2), 42–55.
14. Derakhshan, A., & Yin, H. (2025). Do positive emotions prompt students to be more active? Unraveling the role of hope, pride, and enjoyment in predicting Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ academic engagement. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(9), 3099–3117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2329166
15. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
16. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
17. Fu, Y., Wang, M., Min, S., Zhou, S., & Pan, X. (2023). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and Chinese EFL learners’ listening skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1148610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148610
18. Gerami, M. H., & Baighlou, S. M. G. (2011). Language learning strategies used by successful and unsuccessful Iranian EFL students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.399
19. Ghafournia, N. (2014). Language learning strategy use and reading achievement. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p64
20. Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
21. Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667.009
22. Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.
23. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
24. Habók, A., Magyar, A., & Molnár, G. (2022). English as a foreign language learners’ strategy awareness across proficiency levels from the perspective of self-regulated learning metafactors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1019561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1019561
25. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
26. Li, Y. (2025). The influence of emotional factors in second language acquisition and its countermeasures from the perspective of educational psychology. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 85, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.20875
27. Lin, J., & Wang, Y. (2025). Exploring Chinese university students’ foreign language enjoyment, engagement and willingness to communicate in EFL speaking classes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 650. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04948-z
28. Liu, M. (2025). Learning style preferences, strategy use and Chinese undergraduate EFL students’ English achievements. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.17111
29. Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1996). The good language learner. Multilingual Matters.
30. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
31. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
32. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Pearson Education.
33. Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
34. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistik veri analizi [Statistical data analysis with package programs]. Kaan Kitabevi.
35. Pawlak, M. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819876156
36. Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: Interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.733886 Razı, S. (2012). Turkish EFL learners’ language learning strategy employment at university level. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 8(1), 94–119.
37. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
38. Šafranj, J. (2013). Strategies of learning English as a foreign language at Faculty of Technical Sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.278
39. Salam, U., Sukarti, & Arifin, Z. (2020). An analysis of learning styles and learning strategies used by a successful language learner. Journal of English Teaching, 6(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i2.1734
40. Saputra, E. W., & Subekti, N. B. (2017). A study of the speaking learning strategies used by English Education Department students. Journal of English Language and Language Teaching, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v1i1.915
41. Saygı, G. (2025). An experimental study on K-12 students’ intercultural communicative competence and perceptions of native English varieties (Publication No. 10703018) [Doctoral dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
42. Saygı, G., & Köksal, D. (2024). Investigating the impact of intercultural communicative competence training at high school setting. Novitas-ROYAL, 18(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13861245
43. Shi, L. (2025). The integration of advanced AI-enabled emotion detection and adaptive learning systems for improved emotional regulation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241296890
44. Suhesti, A., Kasmaini, K., & Kurniawan, I. (2022). Language learning strategies used by male and female students in learning speaking. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.1.45-56
45. Taheri, H., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S., & Bavali, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ use of language learning strategies and foreign language skills achievement. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), Article 1710944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1710944 Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339
46. Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586898
47. Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2024). The dynamic nature of emotions in language learning context: Theory, method, and analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09946-2
48. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). Macmillan.
49. Wong, L. L. C., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004
50. Yüksel, H. G., Solhi, M., Özcan, E., & Giritlioğlu, N. B. (2025). The associations between EFL learners’ L2 class belongingness, emotion regulation strategies, and perceived L2 proficiency in an online learning context. The Language Learning Journal, 53(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2024.2403463
51. Zafari, M., & Biria, R. (2014). The relationship between emotional intelligence and language learning strategy use. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1966–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.630
52. Zakaria, N. Y. K., Zakaria, S. N., & Azmi, N. E. (2018). Language learning strategies used by secondary schools students in enhancing speaking skills. Creative Education, 9(14), 2357–2366. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914176
53. Zare, J., Zhang, L. J., & Ranjbaran Madiseh, F. (2025). Emotion regulation strategies and task engagement in L2 development: A structural equation modeling analysis. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2501605
54. Zenginaloğlu, K., & Özçelik, N. (2023). Fransızcanın yabancı dil olarak öğreniminde üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme stratejilerini kullanımı [University students’ use of learning strategies in learning French as a foreign language]. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 11(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijlet.68539
55. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
56. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2