What is the Ultimate Source of Normativity of a (New) Constitution? Replies From Legal Positivism

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 109 - 132, 01.04.2011

Ali Acar

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Ackerman, Bruce A. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” The Yale Law Journal 93, no. 6 (1984): 1013-72.
• Albert, Richard. “Nonconstitutional Amendments.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XXII, no. 1 (2009): 5-47.
• Delacroix, Sylvie. “Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted.” Ratio Juris 17, no. 4 (2004): 501-20.
• Dickson, Julie. “Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 3 (2007): 373-402.
• Eekelaar, J. M. “The Principles of Revolutionary Legality.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 22-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
• Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Precedent-Based Constitutional Adjudication, Acceptance, and the Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the Us Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 47-68. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Finnis, John M. “Revolutions and Continuity of Law.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 44-77. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
• Gözler, Kemal. “Kurucu İktidar - Tali Kurucu İktidar Ayrımı: Tbmm Yeni Bir Anayasa Yapabilir Mi? .” (2011), http://www.anayasa.gen.tr/tbmm-yeni-anayasa.htm#_ftn5.
• Green, Leslie. “Positivism and Conventionalism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12, no. 1 (1999): 35-52.
• Harris, J. W. “When and Why Does the Grundnorm Change?” Cambridge Law Journal 29, no. 1 (1971): 103-33.
• Hart, H. L. A. “Kelsen Visited.” UCLA Law Review 10 (1962-63): 712-28.
• ———. Essays on Bentham- Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. London; New York: Clanderon Press- Oxford University 1982.
• ———. The Concept of Law- with a Postscript Edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
• Himma, Kenneth Einar. “The U.S. Constitution and the Conventional Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 95-122. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Jaume, Lucien. “Constituent Power in France: The Revolution and Its Consequences.” In The Paradox of Constitutionalism Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, edited by Neil Walker and Martin Loughlin, 67-86. Oxford - New York: Oxford University, 2007.
• Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg: Russell&Russell, 1945.
• ———. Pure Theory of Law, translated by Max Knight. 2nd ed. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith, 1989, reprint, translation from: Reine Rechtslehre. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Vienna: Deuticke 1960; First published 1967.
• ———. General Theory of Norms. translated by Michael Hartney. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
• ———. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory- a Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford ; New York Oxford University Press, 1992.
• MacCormick, Neil. H.L.A. Hart. 1 ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1981.
• ———. “Beyond the Sovereign State.” The Modern Law Review 56, no. 1 (1993): 1-18.
• MacIntyre, A. C. “Hume On “Is” And “Ought”.” The Philosophical Review 68, no. 4 (1959): 451-68.
• Martindale, Don. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theories. 2 ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1981.
• Postema, Gerald J. “Coordination and Convention at the Foundation of Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 165-203.
• Preuss, Ulrich K. “Constitutional Powermaking for the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations between Constituent Power and the Constitution.” Cardozo Law Review 14 (1992-1993): 639-60.
• Raz, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System : An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System 2ed. Oxford: New York Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1980.
• ———. Practical Reason and Norms. 2 ed. Princeton ; New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990. Reprint, revised edition of 1975 by Hutchinson Press.
• Schauer, Frederick. “Amending the Presupposition of a Constitution.” In Responding to Imperfection : The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment edited by Sanford Levinson, 145-63. Princeton: Princeton University, 1995.
• TBMM. “TBMM Başkanı Cemil Çiçek Başkanlığında Anayasa Hukuku Profesörleri İle Toplantı.” Ankara: TBMM, 2011. http://yenianayasa.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/anayasa-hukukculari-ile-toplanti.pdf
• Turan, Mehmet “Anayasanın Ön Varsayımlarını Değiştirmek: Frederick Schauer’in Hukuk Sisteminin Hukuksal Olmayan veya Hukuk Dışı Temellerinin Değişimi Konusundaki Görüşleri.” Çankaya University Journal of Law 6, no. 1 (2011): 1-20.
• Yalden-Thomson, D. C. . “Hume’s View of ‘Is-Ought’.” Philosophy 53, no. 203 (1978): 89-93.