Derleme

Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework

Öz

The article reconsiders anxiety in neurofinance by treating it not only as a source of bias or pathology but also as a regulatory signal that may support financial judgment under uncertainty. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, affective neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and behavioral finance, the study develops a selective and structured narrative review of the literature on anxiety, threat anticipation, loss processing, ambiguity, reward–punishment learning, attention, and impulse control. Its starting point is Freud’s concept of anxiety as a danger signal, which is extended through contemporary evidence on amygdala–prefrontal regulation, autonomic arousal, vigilance, and decision-making under risk and ambiguity. The central argument is that anxiety has a dialectical structure. When proportionate and regulated, it may enhance vigilance, early loss detection, cautious risk evaluation, delayed action, and disciplined portfolio monitoring. When overactivated, the same signal may produce threat fixation, cognitive narrowing, asymmetrical learning from losses, excessive liquidity preference, panic selling, and reactive decision-making. The article therefore proposes a tension-based framework in which anxiety operates between adaptive regulation and maladaptive dysregulation. This framework connects individual affective calibration to broader financial behavior without reducing anxiety to either a clinical disorder or a simple cognitive bias. The article contributes to neurofinance by showing how anxiety may function as both a stabilizing and destabilizing force in financial decision-making.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

This study received no financial support from any institution, organization, or funding body. All stages of the research were conducted independently by the author.

Etik Beyan

This study adheres to the principles of scientific research and publication ethics. No ethical misconduct was involved in the research process, and the work was prepared entirely by the author. As the study does not involve human or animal subjects, ethical committee approval was not required.

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Shammassian BH, DiGiorgio A, Manley G. Systems of Neurotrauma HealthCare. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2025 Jul;36(3):459-465. Doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2025.03.015. PMID: 40543954.
  2. 2. Shammassian BH, Wooster L, Wright JM, Kelly ML. Systematic review of trauma system regionalization and implementation on outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients. Neurol Res. 2021 Feb;43(2):87-96. Doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1824391. Epub 2020 Sep 24. PMID: 32967585
  3. 3. Pitts LH. Neurotrauma and trauma systems. New Horiz. 1995 Aug;3(3):546-8. PMID: 7496766.
  4. 4. The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Trauma systems. J Neurotrauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;17(6- 7):457-62. Doi: 10.1089/neu.2000.17.457. PMID: 10937887.
  5. 5. Trauma systems and the neurosurgeon. Brain Trauma Foundation. J Neurotrauma. 1996 Nov;13(11):647-51. Doi: 10.1089/neu.1996.13.647. PMID: 8941881.
  6. 6. Kelly ML, Banerjee A, Nowak M, Steinmetz M, Claridge JA. Decreased mortality in traumatic brain injury following regionalization across hospital systems. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Apr;78(4):715-20. Doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000590. PMID: 25807401.
  7. 7. Kelly ML, Roach MJ, Banerjee A, Steinmetz MP, Claridge JA. Functional and long-term outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury following regionalization of a trauma system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Sep;79(3):372-7. Doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000762. PMID: 26307868.
  8. 8. Härtl R, Gerber LM, Iacono L, Ni Q, Lyons K, Ghajar J. Direct transport within an organized state trauma system reduces mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2006 Jun;60(6):1250-6; discussion 1256. Doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000203717.57821.8d. PMID: 16766968.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Finans ve Yatırım (Diğer)

Bölüm

Derleme

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Kasım 2025

Kabul Tarihi

29 Nisan 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Polat, Y. (2026). Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış, 10(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.69851/car.1826163
AMA
1.Polat Y. Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework. CAR. 2026;10(1):1-25. doi:10.69851/car.1826163
Chicago
Polat, Yusuf. 2026. “Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework”. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış 10 (1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.69851/car.1826163.
EndNote
Polat Y (01 Haziran 2026) Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış 10 1 1–25.
IEEE
[1]Y. Polat, “Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework”, CAR, c. 10, sy 1, ss. 1–25, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.69851/car.1826163.
ISNAD
Polat, Yusuf. “Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework”. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış 10/1 (01 Haziran 2026): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.69851/car.1826163.
JAMA
1.Polat Y. Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework. CAR. 2026;10:1–25.
MLA
Polat, Yusuf. “Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework”. Kapadokya Akademik Bakış, c. 10, sy 1, Haziran 2026, ss. 1-25, doi:10.69851/car.1826163.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Polat. Rethinking Anxiety in Neurofinance: A Dialectical Framework. CAR. 01 Haziran 2026;10(1):1-25. doi:10.69851/car.1826163