BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 340 - 358, 01.03.2013

Öz

The purpose of the study is to solve the problem of determining the best subcontractor among those which sew the orders of the worldwide known brands in the clothing sector through multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models. Hence two models are utilised for the determination of the best sub-contractor. The decisionmaking criteria are determined through utilising the preliminary interviews with three suppliers in the sector and the literature review on supplier selection. By this means original criteria are brought to the literature as the criteria for supplier selection. As Bu makale, Pınar Arslan’ın Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Bölümü’nde sunmuş olduğu “Hazır Giyim Sektöründe En İyi Fason İşletme Seçimi İçin Bulanık AHS ve Bulanık TOPSIS Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması” başlıklı Yüksek Lisans Tezinden yararlanılarak hazırlanmıştır. the criteria of decision problem have hierarchic structure the AHP and VIKOR models are utilised. In the decision problem there are 6 main-criteria, 18 sub-criteria and 4 alternatives. While AHP model gives weight to the criteria, it is influenced by extreme values.

Kaynakça

  • AGARWAL, Prince Sahai, Manjai MISHRA, Vahimav BAG, Monark and SINGH, Vrijendra (2011), “A Review Of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques For Supplier Evaluation and Selection”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2:801–810.
  • CHEN, Lisa and WANG TIEN-Chin (2009), “Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS / It Outsourcing Projects: The Strategic Decision of Fuzzy VIKOR”, Int. J.Production Economics, 120:233–242.
  • CHERAGHI, Hossein Dadashzadeh, Mohammad and Subramanian, Muthu (2004), “Critical Success Factors For Supplier Selection: An Update”, Journal of Applied Business Research, 20 (2):91-108.
  • DICKSON, W. Gary (1966), “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1):5-17.
  • HO, William XU, Xiaowei and DEY, Parasanta (2010), “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches For Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 202:16–24.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim (2011), “Fuzzy VIKOR with an Application to Water Resources Planning”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38:12983– 12990.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim and TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung (2007), “Extended VĠKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 178:514-529.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim and TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung (2004), “The Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2):445–455.
  • SAATY, Thomas (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, United States of America: McGraw-Hill.
  • THIRUCHELVAM, Sivadass and TOOKEY, John (2011) “Evolving Trends of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods”, International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 4:437-454.
  • ULUCAN, Aydın (2007), Yöneylem Araştırması, (2.baskı). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • WEBER, Charles ARTHUR, Current, John Richard and Benton, W. C. (1991), “Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1):2-18.
  • WU, Chong and BARNES, David (2011), “Literature Review of Decision-Making Models And Approaches For Partner Selection in Agile Supply Chains”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 17:256–274.
  • YARALIOĞLU, Kaan (2001), “Performans Değerlendirmede Analitik HiyerarĢi Prosesi”, D.E.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 16(1):129-142.

Hazır Giyim Sektöründe En İyi Fason İşletme Seçimi İçin AHP ve VİKOR

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 340 - 358, 01.03.2013

Öz

Çalışmamızın amacı Hazır Giyim Sektöründe dünyaca ünlü markaların siparişlerini diken en iyi fason işletme seçimi problemini Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemleri ile çözmektir. Bunun için en iyi fasoncu seçiminde iki yöntem ortaya koyulmuştur. Karar probleminin kriterleri, sektördeki üç tedarikçi firma ile yapılan ön mülakatlardan ve literatürde tedarikçi seçimi çalışmalarından yararlanılarak belirlenmiştir. Bu sayede literatüre tedarikçi seçim kriteri olarak yeni kriterler eklenmiştir. Karar probleminin kriterleri hiyerarşik yapıya uygun olduğu için AHP ve VIKOR yöntemleri çözümde kullanılmıştır. Karar probleminde 6 ana kriter, 18 alt kriter ve 4 alternatif bulunmaktadır. AHP yöntemi kriterlere ağırlık verirken, uç değerlerden fazla etkilenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • AGARWAL, Prince Sahai, Manjai MISHRA, Vahimav BAG, Monark and SINGH, Vrijendra (2011), “A Review Of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques For Supplier Evaluation and Selection”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2:801–810.
  • CHEN, Lisa and WANG TIEN-Chin (2009), “Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS / It Outsourcing Projects: The Strategic Decision of Fuzzy VIKOR”, Int. J.Production Economics, 120:233–242.
  • CHERAGHI, Hossein Dadashzadeh, Mohammad and Subramanian, Muthu (2004), “Critical Success Factors For Supplier Selection: An Update”, Journal of Applied Business Research, 20 (2):91-108.
  • DICKSON, W. Gary (1966), “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, 2(1):5-17.
  • HO, William XU, Xiaowei and DEY, Parasanta (2010), “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches For Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 202:16–24.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim (2011), “Fuzzy VIKOR with an Application to Water Resources Planning”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38:12983– 12990.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim and TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung (2007), “Extended VĠKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 178:514-529.
  • OPRICOVIC, Serafim and TZENG, Gwo-Hshiung (2004), “The Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2):445–455.
  • SAATY, Thomas (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, United States of America: McGraw-Hill.
  • THIRUCHELVAM, Sivadass and TOOKEY, John (2011) “Evolving Trends of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods”, International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 4:437-454.
  • ULUCAN, Aydın (2007), Yöneylem Araştırması, (2.baskı). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • WEBER, Charles ARTHUR, Current, John Richard and Benton, W. C. (1991), “Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1):2-18.
  • WU, Chong and BARNES, David (2011), “Literature Review of Decision-Making Models And Approaches For Partner Selection in Agile Supply Chains”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 17:256–274.
  • YARALIOĞLU, Kaan (2001), “Performans Değerlendirmede Analitik HiyerarĢi Prosesi”, D.E.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 16(1):129-142.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nezih Tayyar Bu kişi benim

Araş. Gör. Pınar Arslan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Tayyar, Y. D. D. N., & Arslan, A. G. P. (2013). Hazır Giyim Sektöründe En İyi Fason İşletme Seçimi İçin AHP ve VİKOR. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 340-358.