Comparison of Reactive Agility and Preplanned Change of Direction in Individual and Team Sports

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare reactive agility (RA) and pre-planned change of direction (PYD) skills in individual, team and racquet sports. A total of eighty male athletes from 7 different branches, actively engaged in sports between the ages of 18-25, participated in the study. The universal reactive agility UA-RA test was used to determine the RA skills of the participants, while the return areas of the UA-RA protocol were measured in the usual way to determine the PYD skills. The independent variable t-test was used to compare the PYD and RA values of the athletes in the branch. ANOVA test was used to compare the results of the test between the groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the tests. At the end of the study, there was no significant difference between PYD skills according to branches, but the RA values of both football players and basketball players (respectively 12.46±1.48 sec - 12.93±1.08 sec vs. 14.29±1.75sec, 15.27±1.58 sec, 14.14±1.31 sec, p< 0.05) was found to be shorter than karate, taekwondo, wrestling athletes. It was determined that PYD skill values were significantly shorter than RA values in all branches (p<0.001), and there was a moderately significant positive correlation between PYD and RA skill values of all athletes (r=.432, p<.05). As a result, it is recommended that agility training in football and basketball branches include RA activities, including cognitive activities. It is also recommended that RA activity and measurement methods have content that reflects the characteristics of the sport.

Keywords

• Agility
• Individual
• Team sports
• Preplanned change of direction
• Racquet sports
• Reactive agility

Bireysel Sporlar ile Raket ve Takım Sporlarında Reaktif Çeviklik ve Planlı Yön Değiştirme Becerilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı bireysel, takım ve raket sporlarında reaktif çeviklik (RÇ) ve planlı yön değiştirme (PYD) becerilerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışmaya 18-25 yaş aralığında aktif bir şekilde spor yapan 7 farklı branştan toplam seksen erkek sporcu katılmıştır. Katılımcıların RÇ becerilerinin belirlenmesi için universal reactive agility (UA-RA) testi uygulanırken, PYD becerisinin belirlenmesi için UA-RA protokolünün dönüş alanları bilinen şekli ile ölçülmüştür. Branş içindeki sporcuların PYD ve RÇ değerlerinin karşılaştırılması için bağımsız değişken t testi kullanılmıştır. Her iki testin sonucunun gruplar arasında karşılaştırılması amacıyla ANOVA testinden yararlanılmıştır. Testler arasında bulunan ilişkinin saptanmasında Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonunda branşlara göre PYD becerileri arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, sırasıyla hem futbolcuların hem de basketbolcuların RÇ değerlerinin (12.46±1.48 sn - 12,93±1,08 sn karşın 14.29±1.75, 15.27±1.58, 14.14±1.31 sn, p<0.05) karate, tekvando, güreş, sporcularına göre daha kısa olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Tüm branşlarda PYD becerisinin anlamlı olarak RÇ değerlerinden daha kısa olduğu (p<0,001), ayrıca tüm sporcuların PYD ve RÇ becerileri arasında pozitif yönde orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir (r=0,432, p<0,05). Sonuç olarak, futbol ve basketbol branşlarında çeviklik çalışmalarının bilişsel aktiviteleri de kapsayan RÇ aktivitelerini içermesi tavsiye edilmektedir. Ayrıca RÇ çalışmalarının ve ölçüm metotlarının sporun özelliklerini yansıtan içeriklere sahip olması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çeviklik
• Bireysel
• Takım sporları
• Planlı yön değiştirme
• Raket sporları
• Reaktif çeviklik

Kaynakça

1. Akyüz, M., Uzaldi, B. B., Akyüz, Ö., & Dogru, Y. (2017). Comparison of sprint reaction and visual reaction times of athletes in different branches. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(1), 94-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i1.1987
2. Armstrong, R., & Greig, M. (2018). The Functional movement screen and modified star excursion balance test as predictors of T-test agility performance in university rugby union and netball players. Physical Therapy in Sport, 31, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.003
3. Barnes, J. L., Schilling, B. K., Falvo, M. J., Weiss, L. W., Creasy, A. K., & Fry, A. C. (2007). Relationship of jumping and agility performance in female volleyball athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(4), 1192-1196. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-22416.1
4. Benvenuti, C., Minganti, C., Condello, G., Capranica, L., & Tessitore, A. (2010). Agility assessment in female futsal and soccer players. Medicina, 46(6), 415-420. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina46060058
5. Bloomfield, J., Polman, R., & O'Donoghue, P. (2007). Physical demands of different positions in FA Premier League soccer. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 6(1), 63-70.
6. Buttifant, D., Graham, K., & Cross, K. (2001). 55 Agility and speed in soccer players are two different performance parameters. Science and Football IV, 4,329-340.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 001-214.
8. Chelladurai, P. (1976). Manifestations of agility. Journal of the Canadian Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 42(3), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109

9. Farrow, D., Young, W., & Bruce, L. (2005). The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: A new methodology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 8(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1440-2440(05)80024-6
10. Gabbett, T. J., Kelly, J. N., & Sheppard, J. M. (2008). Speed, change of direction speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 22(1), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815ef700
11. Gabbett, T., & Benton, D. (2009). Reactive agility of rugby league players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(1), 212-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.08.011
12. Greig, M., & Naylor, J. (2017). The Efficacy of angle-matched isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength parameters in predicting agility test performance. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 12(5), 728-736. https://doi.org/10.16603/ijspt20170728
13. Inglis, P., & Bird, S. P. (2016). Reactive agility tests: Review and practical applications. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, 24, 62-69.
14. Jeffreys, I. (2011). A task-based approach to developing context-specific agility. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 33(4), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e318222932a
15. Kirby, R. F. (1971). A Simple test of agility. Coach and Athlete, 25(6), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2013.044
16. Lockie, R. G., Jeffries, M. D., McGann, T. S., Callaghan, S. J., & Schultz, A. B. (2014). Planned and reactive agility performance in semiprofessional and amateur basketball players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9, 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0324
17. Mackala, K., Vodičar, J., Žvan, M., Križaj, J., Stodolka, J., Rauter, S., ... & Čoh, M. (2020). Evaluation of the pre-planned and non-planned agility performance: Comparison between individual and team sports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030975
18. Oliver, J. L., & Meyers, R. W. (2009). Reliability and generality of measures of acceleration planned agility, and reactive agility. International Journal of Sports Physiology and performance, 4(3), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.4.3.345
19. Popowczak, M., Cichy, I., Rokita, A., & Domaradzki, J. (2021). The relationship between reactive agility and change of direction speed in professional female basketball and handball players. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, (708771), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708771
20. Rahimpour, M., Vaez Mosavi, S. M. K., Bahmani, M., Shams, A., Rafiee, S., & Zargar, T. (2022). Comparison of decision-making and visual search behavior of expert and novice players in the position of 5 vs. 5 attacks. International Journal of Motor Control and Learning, 4(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001726
21. Reilly, T., Williams, A. M., Nevill, A., & Franks, A. (2000). A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 695-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120078
22. Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training, and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24 (9), 919-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109
23. Stølen, T., Chamari, K., Castagna, C., & Wisløff, U. (2005). Physiology of soccer: An update. Sports Medicine, 35, 501-536. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535060-00004
24. Williams, M., Davids, K., Burwitz, L., & Williams, J. (1993). Cognitive knowledge and soccer performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(2), 579-593. . https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.579
25. Yıldız, M., & Çiğirdik, R. (2018). Elit ve subelit genç karatecilerin reaktif çeviklik ve planlı yön değiştirme becerilerinin karşılaştırılması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.360117
26. Yıldız, M., & Fidan, U. (2018). Validity and reliability of badminton-specific Reactive Agility Test Badmintona özgü geliştirilen Reaktif Çeviklik Testinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(1), 594-603. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i1.5211
27. Young, W. B., James, R., & Montgomery, I. (2002). Is muscle power related to running speed with changes in direction? Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 42(3), 282-288.
28. Young, W., & Farrow, D. (2006). A review of agility: Practical applications for strength and conditioning. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 28(5), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1519/00126548-200610000-00004
29. Zemková, E. (2016). Differential contribution of reaction time and movement velocity to agility performance reflects sport-specific demands. Human Movement, 17(2), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1515/humo-2016-0013