Creating Similar Hearts from Slant-Eyed Tales: A Few Slant-Eyed Words on Asian American Children’s Literature

Abstract

The books written for children have always been a controversial issue in literary studies. They are criticized by both critics and parents as well as teachers and curriculum designers in terms of their content and/or illustrations. A children’s book is chosen by a parent or a teacher according to her/his ideological points of view and socio-cultural background. If a book is written by an author from a minority group or it includes characters having different ethnic backgrounds, these points of view keep these parents and teachers at arm’s length. Also, children’s books are used to shape younger generations in favor of national politics and enculturation processes. That’s why there are too many stereotypes in these books: white male heroes, “ugly” monsters, poor, naïve and illiterate “others”. Specifically, in Asian American children’s literature, authors usually marginalize Asian American characters and describe them as “dead ringers”. However, after the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s, more authors have started to describe Asian Americans from a universal perspective. By rejecting common stereotypes, they try to give some messages universal values such as friendship, cooperation, love of nature and living together as it is discussed in this article within the framework of descriptive analysis.

Keywords

• children’s literature,Asian-American,minorities

Kaynakça

1. Asian Americans in Children's Books. (1976). Interracial Books for Children Bulletin, 7(2&3).
2. Aoki, E. M. (1981). “Are you Chinese? Are you Japanese? Or are you a mixed-up kid?: Using Asian American children’s literature.” The Reading Teacher. USA: International Literacy Association and Wiley.p. 382-385.
3. Ching, S. (2005). Multicultural Children's Literature as an Instrument of Power. Language Arts, 83(2), 128-136. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/41962090
4. Hanson, S., & Gilbert, E. (2012). Family, Gender and Science Experiences: The Perspective of Young Asian Americans. Race, Gender & Class, 19(3/4), 326-347. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/43497502
5. Ng, J., Lee, S., & Pak, Y. (2007). Contesting the Model Minority and Perpetual Foreigner Stereotypes: A Critical Review of Literature on Asian Americans in Education. Review of Research in Education, 31, 95-130. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/20185103
6. Pang, V., Colvin, C., Tran, M., & Barba, R. (1992). Beyond Chopsticks and Dragons: Selecting Asian-American Literature for Children. The Reading Teacher, 46(3), 216-224. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20201048
7. Reimar, K. (1992). Multiethnic Literature: Holding Fast to Dreams. Language Arts, 69(1), 14-21. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/41411555
8. Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology. Pearson & Bacon.

9. Smith, K. C. (2002). Introduction: The Landscape of Ethnic American Children’s Literature. MELUS, Multi-Ethnic Children’s Literature. Oxford University Press. Vol. 27, No.2. Summer.
10. Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological Care of Infant and Child. W. W. Norton Co.
11. Yashima, T. Umbrella. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs8EAOjhqCE.
12. Yau, J., & Jiménez, R. (2003). Fostering the Literacy Strengths of Struggling Asian American Readers. Language Arts, 80(3), 196-205. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/41484129
13. Yep, L. (2001). Dragonwings. USA: Harper Collins.