Humanity in Digital Age: Cognitive, Social, Emotional, and Ethical Implications

Abstract

Even though technology has brought great benefits to current society, there are also indications that the manner in which people use technology has undermined their humanity in some respects. In this article the authors frame human nature in terms of four dimensions: cognition, social interaction, emotion, and ethics. We argue that while basic human nature remains constant, the four dimensions are molded to some extent by interaction with our environment, particularly through the use of technology. As a powerful factor, we need to use technology in a way that human cognition, social interaction, emotion, and ethics are supported and not seriously disturbed by digital devices. Education can be a means of helping learners use technology in a positive way, minimizing its negative potential. This paper shows how people’s choice and level of interaction with technology can allow them to live in harmony with technology. It also points to possible directions to teach healthy co-existence with technology. The suggestions include applying decision-making theory, increasing self-awareness, teaching academic honesty, and responding to problems with technology addiction through impulse control training and other programs

Keywords

• Digital age, Humanity, Cognition, Social interaction, Ethics, Digital citizenship

Kaynakça

1. Albin, K. A. (2012). Bullies in a wired world: The impact of cyberspace victimization on adolescent mental health and the need for cyberbullying legislation in Ohio. Journal of Law & Health, 25(1), 153-188.
2. Ananou, S. T. (2014). Academic honesty in the digital age. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania). Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://pqdtopen.proquest. com/ doc/1524251772.html?FMT=AI
3. Andrews, S., & Gann, L. (2011). An information literacy progression. School Library Monthly, 28(2), 21-23.
4. Ashman, A. F. & Conway, R. N. F. (2002). Introduction to cognitive education: Theory and applications. London: Routledge.
5. Bandura, A. (1973). Agression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prencice-Hall.
7. Bariola, E., Hughes, E. K., & Gullone, E. (2011). Relationships between parent and child emotion regulation strategy use: A brief report. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 21(3), 443-448.
8. Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326-339.

9. Berson, I. R. Berson, M. J., Desai, S., Falls, D., & Fenaughty, J. (2008). An analysis of electronic media to prepare children for safe and ethical practices in digital environments. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 222-243.
10. Bonetti, L., Campbell, M. A., & Gilmore, L. (2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 279-285. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0215
11. Buckner, J. E., Castille, C. M, & Sheets, T. L. (2012). The five factor model of personality and employees’ excessive use of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1947-1953. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212001422
12. Caplan, S. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 10(2), 234-242. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
13. Caplan, S. E. & High, A. C. (2006). Beyond excessive use: The interaction between cognitive and behavioral symptoms of problematic Internet use. Communication Research Report, 23(4), 265-271.
14. Caplan, S. E. & High, A. C. (2011). Online social interaction, psychosocial well-being, and problematic internet use. In K. S. Young, & C. N Abreu (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 35-53). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Casey, B. J., Somerville, L. H., Gotlib, I. H., Ayduk, O., Franklin, N. T., Askren, M. K., Jonides, J., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(36). Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.pnas.org/content/108/36/14998.full. pdf+ html
16. Chambers, J. R. & Davis, M. H. (2012). Perspective-taking and empathy: Ease of self-simulation as a heuristic for inferring empathic feelings. Social Cognition, 30(2), 153-180.
17. Cheng, Y., Shein, P. P., & Chiou, W. (2012). Escaping the impulse to immediate gratification: The prospect concept promotes a future-oriented mindset, prompting an inclination towards delayed gratification. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 129-141. doi: 10.1111/j.2044- 8295.2011.02067.x
18. Deragon, J. (January, 2011). The influence of technology on humanity. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from The Relationship Economy website: http://www.relationshipeconomy.com/2011/ 01/technologys-influence-over-humanity/
19. DeWitt-Heffner, J. & Oxenford, C. (2001, November). Defining the limits: Cyber ethics. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Atlanta, GA.
20. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 380-411.
21. Englander, E. (2008). Cyberbullying & bullying in Massachusetts: Frequency & motivations. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://webhost.bridgew.edu/marc/MARC%20findings%20 summary %202008.pdf
22. Englander, E., Mills, E. & McCoy, M. (2009) Cyberbullying and information exposure: User- generated content in post-secondary education. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 46(2), 213-230.
23. Greenberg, L. S. & Safran, J. D. (1987). Emotion in psychotherapy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24. Gross, E. R. (2011). Clashing values: Contemporary views about cheating and plagiarism compared to traditional beliefs and practices. Education, 132(2), 435-440.
25. Hart, S. R., Dowdy, E., Eklund, K., Renshaw, T. L., Jimerson, S. R., Jones, C., & Earhart, J. (2009). A controlled study assessing the effects of the impulse control and problem solving unit of the Second Step curriculum. The California School Psychologist, 14, 105-110.
26. Hareli, S. & Rafaeli, A. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotions in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59.
27. Hill, R. B. (2004). Closing thought about ethics for citizenship in a technological world. In R. Hill (Ed.), Ethics for citizenship in a technological world (pp.267-276). New York: Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
28. Hsu, T. (2009). Flaming issues in online courses. International Journal of Learning, 15(10), 65-70.
29. Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011a). Implications of affective and social neuroscience for educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 98-103.
30. Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011b). Me, my “self” and you: Neuropsychological relations between social emotion, self-awareness, and morality. Emotion Review, 3, 313-315, doi: 10.1177/1754073911402391
31. Jiang, Q. & Leung, L. (2012). Effects of individual differences, awareness-knowledge, and acceptance of Internet addiction as a health risk on willingness to change Internet habits. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 170-183. doi: 10.1177/0894439311398440
32. Johnstone, S. M. (2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Quarterly Review, 3, 15-18.
33. Jones, S. G. (1997). The Internet and its social landscape. In S. G. Jones (Ed.). Virtual culture (pp.7- 35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Karim, R. & Chaudhri, P. (2012). Behavioral addictions: An overview. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 44(1), 5-17. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2012.662859
35. Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180-198.
36. Kraushaar, J. M. & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241-251.
37. Lane, A. (2008). Who puts the education into open educational content? In. R. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing (pp.158-169). Washington D.C.: Educause.
38. Lazar, J., Kaplan, O., Sternberg, T., & Lubow, R. E. (2012). Positive and negative affect produce opposing task-irrelevant stimulus preexposure effects. Emotion, 12(3), 591-604.
39. Lee, H. (2005). Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(2), 385-403.
40. McQuillen, J. S. (2003). Education, 123(3), 616-623.
41. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
42. Mischel, W., Ayduk., O., Berman, M. G., Casey., B. J., Gotlib., I H., Jonides, J., Kross, E., Teslovich., T., Wilson, N. L., Zayas, V., & Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self- regulation. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252-256. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq081
43. Moore, C. (2003). The mediation process. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Murphy, J. W., & Pardeck, J. T. (1986). Introduction. In J. W. Murphy & J. T. Pardeck (Eds.), Technology and human productivity (pp. xiii – xx). New York, NY: Quorum Books.
45. Okada, G., Okamoto, Y., Kunisato, Y., Aoyama, S., Nishiyama, Y., Yoshimura, S., Onoda, K., Toki, S., Yamashita, H., & Yamawaki, S. (2011). The effect of negative and positive emotionality on associative memory: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24862. doi: 10.1371/journal.phone.[phone]
46. Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Humanities Press.
47. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York, NY: Grossman Publishers.
48. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures (R. Rsoin, Trans.). New York, NY: Viking Press.
49. Polites, G. L., & Karahanna E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 21-42.
50. Radziwill, N. (2010). Disconnected: Technology addiction & the search for authenticity in virtual life. [Kindle version]. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from http://www.amazon.com/Disconnected- Technology-Addiction-Authenticity-ebook/dp/B0041T4JBM/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8 &m=AG56TWVU5XWC2
51. Rao, K., Eady, M., & Edelen-Smith, P. (2011). Creating virtual classrooms for rural and remote communities. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 22-27.
52. Ribble, M. (2009). Raising a digital child. Washington D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.
53. Ribble, M. (2011). Digital citizenship in schools (2nd ed.). Eugene, Oregon: The International Society for Technology in Education.
54. Rosen, L. D. (2012). iDisorder: understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us [Kindle version]. Retrieved on 18 June 2014 from https://kindle.amazon.com/ work/idisorder-understanding-obsession-technology-overcoming/B005NTF0OY/ 0230117570
55. Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicologia Educativa, 17(2), 163-177.
56. Rowan, C. (2010). Unplug – don’t drug: A critical look at the influence of technology on child behavior with an alternative way of responding other than evaluation and drugging. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(1), 60-68. doi: 10.1891/1559-4343.12.1.60
57. Schoffstall, C. L. & Cohen, R. (2011). Cyber aggression: The relations between online offenders and offline social competence. Social Development, 20(3), 587-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9507.2011.00609.x
58. Sharkey, P. T., Tirado-Strayer, N., Parachristos, A. V., & Raver, C. (2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2287-2293. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300789
59. Smith, A. T. & Place, N. A. (2011). Fostering teaching and learning through an inquiry-based literacy methods course. The New Educator, 7(4), 305-324.
60. Springen, K. (2012). Are teens embracing e-books? Publishers Weekly, 259(8), 20-23.
61. The new face of cheating. (2011, Back to School). Scholastic Administrator, 11(1). 14.
62. Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2011). Family and work-related consequences of addiction to organizational pervasive technologies. Information & Management, 48, 88-95.
63. Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011). Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction uses. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1043-1061.
64. Turke, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
65. Turnage, A. K. (2008). Email flaming behavior and organizational conflict. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13(1), 43-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00385.x
66. Wills, J. (2007). The gully in the ‘brain glitch’ theory. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 68-73.
67. Yamamoto, J. (2011). The muddy field of social networking: Implications for teacher educators. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 3369-3373). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
68. Young, K. S. (2011). CBT-IA: The first treatment model for Internet addiction. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25(4), 304-312.
69. Young, K. S., Yue, X. D. & Ying, L. (2011). Prevalence estimates and etiologic models of Internet addiction. In K. S. Young & C. N. de Abreau (Eds.), Internet addiction (pp. 3-17). Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley & Sons.
70. Correspondence: Junko Yamamoto, Associate Professor, Department of Secondary Education/
71. Foundations of Education, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA, United States