Examining the Self-Efficacy of Prospective Teachers in Technology Integration According to their Subject Areas: The Case of Turkey

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine prospective teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy and variables affecting their training to integrate technology in education according to their subject areas. The survey research, a quantitative research method, was used in the study. The sample of the study is composed of senior prospective teachers (n=3553) from 19 different departments of 18 state universities in Turkey. The departments were gathered into nine subject areas by taking into consideration the criteria of prospective teachers’ subject areas. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis H tests were used for the comparisons of the groups. The results of the study show that TPACK is perceived differently according to the subject areas. Prospective teachers think that teacher educators do not sufficiently exhibit technology integration behaviors in their lessons and participants think that they somewhat have authentic experiences in using technology in education. While both scores of TPACK self-efficacy and variables affecting prospective teachers’ training to integrate technology in education are higher in favor of Foreign Languages subject area; prospective teachers in Mathematics and Turkish language have lower scores than other subject areas in the study. As a result, the self-efficacy of prospective teachers’ technology integration significantly differentiates.

Keywords

• Technology integration,TPACK,Self-efficacy,Prospective teachers

Kaynakça

1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
2. Albion, P. R. (2014). Pre-service teachers' TPACK confidence in a regional Australian university. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE 2014) (pp. 10-17). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
3. Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
4. Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK. New York: Springer.
5. Aydın-Gunbatar, S., Boz, Y., & Yerdelen-Damar, S. A. (2017). Closer examination of TPACK-self-efficacy construct: Modeling elementary pre-service science teachers’ TPACK-self efficacy. Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 917-934. https://doi.org/10.17051/ ilkonline.2017.330232
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. A. Bandura (Ed.) Self-efficacy in changing society (pp.1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

9. Baran, E., Chuang, Hsueh-Hua., & Thompson, A. (2011). TPACK: An emerging research and development tool for teacher educators. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 370-377.
10. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning ın technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1
11. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328488
12. Cavanagh, R. F. & Koehler, M. J. (2013) A turn toward specifying validity criteria in the measurement of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15391523.2013.10782616
13. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C. & Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school preservice teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57, 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
16. Darby, L. (2009). Translating a “Relevance Imperative” into junior secondary mathematics and science pedagogy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75279
17. Dargut, T. & Celik, G. (2014). Pre-Service Turkish Language Teachers’ Attitudes and Thoughts toward Use of Technology in Education. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 2(2), 28-41. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
18. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Ed.). London: Sage publications.
19. Gezgin, D. M. & Silahsızoglu (2016). The impact of the use of information technologies on Turkish. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 28-46. https://doi.org/10. 17569/tojqi.51712
20. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.
21. Harris, J.,Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
22. Hirca, N. & Simsek, H. (2013). Enhancing and evaluating prospective teachers’ techno-pedagogical knowledge integration towards science subject. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 57-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/nefmed153.
23. Hsu, S. (2010). Developing a scale for teacher integration of information and communication technology in grades 1-9. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00348.x
24. ISTE (2014). ISTE Standards teachers. Retrieved on 16 December 2018 from http://www.iste. org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf.
25. Jamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G., Albion, P., Cavanagh, R., Fitzgerald, R., Bond, T., & Grimbeek, P. (2012). Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) project: Development of the TTF TPACK survey instrument. Paper presented at ACEC2012: ITs Time Conference. Perth, Australia. Retrieved on 16 December 2018 from http://bit.ly/ACEC2012_Proceedings
26. John, P. D. & Baggott la Velle, L. (2004). Devices and desires: subject subcultures, pedagogical identity and the challenge of information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200188
27. Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H.F., Kilicer, K, Coklar, A.N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A.A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2011.10.012
28. Karaseva, A., Siibak, A., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2015). Relationships between teachers` pedagogical beliefs, subject cultures, and mediation practices of students' use of digital technology. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-6
29. Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In J. A. Colbert, K. E. Boyd, K. A. Clark, S. Guan, J. B. Harris, M. A. Kelly & A. D. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
30. Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16–31). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
31. Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175-190. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4
32. Krueger, K, Hansen, L., & Smaldino. S. (2003). Preservice teacher technology competencies: A model for preparing teachers of tomorrow to use technology. TechTrends, 44(3), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02778227
33. Kula, A. (2015). Investigating prospective teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) competences: Bartin University sample. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 3(12), 395-412.
34. Kula, A. & Deryakulu, D. (2017). Different subject teachers’ views, applications and suggestions about ICT integration in education. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.267187
35. Lai, T., & Lin, H. (2018). An investigation of the relationship of beliefs, values and technological pedagogical content knowledge among teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1496137
36. Lee, M. H. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4
37. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
38. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
39. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education 21(2005) 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
40. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24. Retrieved on 2 February 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29448/.
41. Ozgen, K., Narli, S., & Alkan, H. (2013). An investigation of mathematics teacher trainees’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and their perception of the frequency of technology use. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(44), 31-51.
42. Roblyer, M.D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Sarac, M. (2015). An explanatory investigation on the Turkish EFL teachers’ TPACK and their attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards (Master of Arts Thesis). Retrieved from The Council of Higher Education Theses database of Turkey. (Thesis No. 395176).
44. Simsek, O. & Yazar, T. (2016, October). Validity and reliability study of technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale based on international educational technology standards (TPACK-ISTE). Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Lifelong Learning and Leadership for All. Olomouc, Czech Republic.
45. Tay, L. Y., Lim, C. P., & Lim, S. K. (2015). Differences in ICT usage across subject areas: A case of an elementary school in Singapore. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585930
46. Tay, L. Y., Lim, S. K., & Lim, C. P. (2013). Factors affecting the ICT integration and implementation of one-to-one computing learning environment in a primary school –A sociocultural perspective. In L. Y. Tay & C. P. Lim (Eds.), Creating holistic technology-enhanced learning experiences: Tales from a future school in Singapore (pp. 19-37). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
47. Toledo, C. (2005). A five-stage model of computer technology integration into teacher education curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 177-191.
48. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). A comprehensive investigation of TPACK within pre-service teachers’ ICT profiles: Mind the gap! Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3504
49. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2011.10.009
50. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
51. Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
52. Tuncer, M. (2014). The relationship between teacher efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) within the scope of EFL pre-service teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Retrieved from The Council of Higher Education Theses database of Turkey. (Thesis No. 373608)
53. Voogt, J. & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
54. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
55. Waggoner, M. D. (1994). Disciplinary differences and the integration of technology into teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 3(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962029940030205
56. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
57. Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 411-419. DOI:10.1080/ 14703290802377307
58. Yaman, H. & Erdogan, Y. (2007). The influence of internet on the Turkish language: A Qualitative study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 237-249.
59. Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707-722.
60. Zelkowski, J., Gleason, J., Cox, D. C., & Bismarck, S. (2013). Developing and validating a reliable TPACK instrument for secondary mathematics preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013. 10782618
61. Zhao, Y. & Frank, K. (2003).Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/00028312040004807