Opinions and Attitudes of Prospective Teachers for the Use of Mobile Phones in Foreign Language Learning

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 239 - 255, 01.09.2015

İsmail Cakir

Öz

The aim of this study is to explore the current use of mobile phones in a foreign language teaching context where Engish is used as the medium of instruction by prospective teachers. To this end, it presents the views of prospective English teachers on utilizing the mobile phone as an instructional tool for foreign language learning purposes in the educational and instructional setting of foreign language teaching classrooms. The study utilized a quantitative methodology. In this context, a questionnaire was developed and administered to a sample of 193 participants in an English Language Teaching (ELT) department. The data gathered through the questionnaire were processed and analyzed descriptively. Results indicate that most of the participants would prefer to use mobile phones as instructional tools in foreign language learning. The results also provided some insights as to how foreign language teachers could employ suitable approaches to make learning and teaching English meaningful and communicative. The results suggested that the participants would like to make use of mobile phones for educational purposes when they become teachers of English. It is recommended that some of technology-based language teaching activities can be implemented using mobile phones and they can be integrated into foreign language teaching curriculum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign language learning, Learner autonomy, m-learning, Mobile assisted learning, Prospective teachers

Kaynakça

• Acarturk, C. (2012). The use of barcode technology in education: An evaluation within the framework of cognitive science. Paper presented at the Academic Computing Conference 2012. February 1-2, 2012. Usak University, Usak.
• Akbulut, Y. (2008). Exploration of the attitudes of freshman foreign language students toward using computers at a Turkish state university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7, 18-31.
• Al Aemri, S.K.(2011). The use of mobile phones in learning English language by Sultan Qaboos University students: Practices, attitudes and challenges. Canadian Journal on Scientific & Industrial Research, 2(3), 143-151.
• Alexanders, B.(2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Educause Review, 39(5), 28-35.
• Ally, Mohammed. (Ed.) (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
• Anohina, A. (2005). Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 91-102.
• Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. London: Learning Skills Development Agency.
• Attewell, J. & Savill-Smith,C. (2005). Mobile learning anytime everywhere. London: Learning and Skills Development.
• Basoglu, E. B. & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 1-7.
• Bayne, S. & Ross, J. (2007). The ‘digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’: A dangerous opposition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). Retrieved on 12 April 2014 from http://www.malts.ed.ac.uk/staff/ sian/natives_ final.pdf.
• Bester, G. & Brand, L. (2013). The effect of technology on learner attention and achievement in the classroom. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-15.
• Burston, J. (2011). Realizing the potential of mobile phone technology for language learning. The IALLT Journal. 41(2), 56-71.
• Chen, NS., SW., Hsieh & Kinshuk (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 12(3), 93–113.
• Chinnery, M.G. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology. 10(1), 9-16.
• Cui, G. & Wang, S. (2008). Adopting cell phones in EFL teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1(1), 68-80.
• Cakir, H. (2011). Mobil ogrenmeye iliskin bir yazilim gelistirme ve degerlendirme. Cukurova Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 2, 01-09.
• Cavus, N. & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
• Cavus, N. & Uzunboylu, H. (2009). Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 434-438.
• Cavus, N., Bicen, H. & Akcil, U. (2008). The opinions of information technology students on using mobile learning. Paper presented at International Conference on Educational Sciences. Magosa, North Cyprus. Eastern Mediterranean University.
• Chen, C. & Chung, C. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624- 645.
• Ducate, L. & Lomicka, L. (2009). Podcasting: An effective tool for honing language students’ pronunciation. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 66-86
• Edirisingha, P., Rizzi, C. Nie, M. & Rothwell, L. (2007). Podcasting to provide teaching and learning support for an undergraduate module on English language and communication. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 8(3), 87-10
• Esit, O. (2011). Your verbal zone: An intelligent computer-assisted language learning program in support of Turkish learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 211-232.
• Friedman, A.D. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey and S. M. Gass (Eds.), Researh methods in second language acqisition (pp.180-200). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Hussein, M.O.M., & Cronje, J.C. (2010). Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Geddes, S.J.(2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: benefit to learners. Retrieved on 25 January 2014 from http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition06/ download/geddes.pdf
• Huang, H.M. & Liaw, S.S. (2005). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729-743.
• Hung, P.H., Hwang. G.J., Su, I.H. & Lin, I.H. (2012). A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 10-19.
• Keskin, O.N. & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202-208.
• Khanna, A. & Singh, A. (2011). Efficacy of ‘stop TB cricket’: A mobile phone game for edutainment. Paper presented at the International Educational Technology Conference. Istanbul.
• Kiernan, P. & Aizawa, K.(2004). Cell phones in task based learning. Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71-84.
• King, J. P. (2006). One hundred philosophers: A guide to world's greatest thinkers (2nd ed.). New York: Chartwell Books.
• Kilickaya, F. (2009). The Effect of a Computer-Assisted Language Learning Course on Pre- Service English Teachers' Practice Teaching. Educational Studies, 35(4), 437-448.
• Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2006). Researching new and emerging technologies in language education. Unpublished presentation to internal Open University, UK INTELLECT research group.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A.& Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? European Journal for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 157-165.
• Kuzu, A., Cuhadar, C,. & Akbulut, Y. (2007). Reflections of undergraduate students regarding PDA use for instructional purposes. Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Instute. 18, 359-365.
• Levy, M. & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In A. Kukulska- Hulme and J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 76-83) London: Taylor & Francis.
• Litchfield, A., Dyson, L., Lawrence, E. & Zmijewska, A. (2007). Directions for m-learning research to enhance active learning. In ICT Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved on 22 May 2014 from http://www. ascilite.org.au/conferences/ singapore07/procs/litchfield.pdf
• Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515-525.
• Mayisela, T. (2013). The potential use of mobile technology: enhancing accessibility and communication in a blended learning course. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-18.
• Markett, C., Sanchet, I.A., Weber, S. & Tangney, B. (2006). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the class room. Computers & Education, 46(3), 280-293.
• McConotha, D., Praul, M.& Lynch, M.J. (2008). Mobile learning in higher education: An empirical assessment of a new educational tool. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 15-21.
• McNeal, T. & van't Hooft, M. (2006). Anywhere, anytime: Using mobile phones for learning. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 2(2), 24-31.
• Meurant, R.C. (2007).Using Cell phones and SMS in second language pedagogy: A review with implications for their intentional use in the L2 classroom. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2(1), 98-106.
• Mounier, A. &Tangchuang, P. (2010). Education and knowledge in Thailand: The quality controversy (1st ed.). Bangkok: Silkworm Books.
• Nah, K.C., White, P.& Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using a mobile phone to access the internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 331-347.
• Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G. & Sharples, M. (2004). Teaching and learning with mobile technologies-case studies. Retrieved on 20 January 2014 from http://www. futurelab.org.uk
• Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-Xers and millennials: Understanding the new students.EDUCAUSE Review, July/August 2003. Retrieved on 22 May 2014 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0342.pdf.
• Odabasi, H. (2009, October). Mobile learning and the mobile library. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Information Age of Being: Opportunities and Threats. Yeditepe University, Istanbul. 1-2 October, 2009.
• Oelofse, C.H. (2008). The Learner profile of a teenage cell phone user. Master of education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Retrieved on 20 January 2014 from http://upetd.up.ac. za/thesis/available/utd-07102009-160407/unrestricted/
• Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
• Reinders, H. & Cho, M.Y. (2010). Extensive listening practice and input enhancement using mobile phones: Encouraging out-of-class learning with mobile phones. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 14(2). Retrieved on 22 May 2014 from http://www. tesl- ej. org /wordpress/issues/volume14/ej54/ej54m2/
• Saran, M., Cagiltay, K. & Seferoglu, G. (2008). Use of mobile phones in language learning: Developing effective instructional materials. 5th International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education-WMUTE2008.
• Saran, M., Cagiltay, K., & Seferoglu, G. (2007). Technology enhanced learning in foreign language education: The use of mobile phones. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). Anaheim, California, USA.
• Saran, M.& Seferoğlu, G. (2010). Supporting foreign language vocabulary learning through multimedia messages via mobile phones. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 38(1), 252-266.
• Sengel, E., Oncu, S., & Goktalay. (2014). Achievement in Language Learning: Effects of Various Computer Assisted Activıties and Computer Literacy. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 29(1), 267-279.
• So, S. (2009). The development of a SMS-based teaching and learning system. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 113-124.
• Song, Y. & Fox, R. (2005). Integrating m-technology into web-based ESL vocabulary learning for working adult learners. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies education. Jhongli, Taiwan. IEEE Computer Society.
• Stockwell, G. (2010).Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.
• Tai, Y. Ting & Y. L. (2011). Adoption of mobile technology for language learning: Teacher attitudes and challenges. The JaltCall Journal, 7(1), 3-18.
• Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217-228.
• Traxler, J. (2009). Current state of mobile-learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile Learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9-25). Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
• Uzunboylu, H. & Ozdamli, F. (2011). Teacher perception for m-learning: Scale development and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 544-556.
• Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D. & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673-695.
• Wu, W., Wu, Y. J., Chen, C., Kao, H., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.
• Zhang, H., Song, W. & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203- 214.
• Correspondence: Ismail Cakir, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages
• Teaching, Faculty of Education, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey